Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
I have been traveling all day. Flying from the West Coast to the East to a conference is a drag because I have to get up so early – 2 am – to catch the Airporter down to San Francisco in time for the plane. ‘Course I didn’t have to go, so grousing is a little bit whiny.
But still, when I said “yes,” I didn’t appreciate just how painful 2 am would be when it finally arrived. Or how long it would take for me to get good internet access once I got to South Carolina.
So this post is an improvement on, but inspired by, one I made much earlier. Not a retread, but a revisiting. Still, I tell myself I have more readers now – and its point is important.
Persuasion is the life blood of democratic politics, but sometimes the issues we face are severe enough we feel called upon to act as Pagans and in Pagan ways to try and make a difference. Either persuasion is not an option, or the time constraints are too demanding.
We can learn from a ritual working against Hitler’s planned invasion of Great Britain.
Many English Witches did rituals to prevent a Nazi invasion. Whether they worked or not will of course never be known. What we do know is that what was done was in harmony with a Wiccan view of the world, that it often works in a smaller scale, that the invasion never happened, and that the change in Hitler’s plans was unexpected by all involved on both sides. Whether it made a difference or not, this was religious involvement in politics on a grand scale indeed.
Energy was raised, given great additional strength by the voluntary sacrifice of some participants’ lives, and a powerful “NO. YOU WILL NOT COME” was sent to Hitler. Philip Heselton’s book ‘Wiccan Roots‘ gives many of the details.
Note first that the working was very concrete and specific. It was a binding – a powerful one. Some gave their lives to add energy. Nothing was abstract about it. It was not a ritual for “world peace” desirable as that goal is. Second, there was universal agreement about the concrete specifics of what was desired by all involved. A powerful unity of will was achieved because of the very simplicity of the issue: stop an invasion. Third, if it could be done it had to be done from within a ritually specific consciousness far removed from normal awareness, and certainly removed from analytic or complex political thought.
This it seems to me is a good example of specifically Pagan political involvement. We can learn from it. It is done entirely outside the political arena. It does not deal with making laws, convincing potential allies, or anything mundane. The moral issues are very clear for all involved. It is oriented towards defense, stopping others from doing harm.
Successful or not, it had all the elements of a good magickal working.
Had the working’s goal been abstract, such as “Hitler will learn love” the unity of wills required would have been harder to achieve because “love” means different things to different people. Had it been for “World Peace” the problems would have been harder still. What does World Peace really mean concretely? There would be a number of interpretations. Further, the number of people required to be influenced by it would have been hopelessly disproportionate to the powers of those doing the working.
I was asked some years ago to participate in a working against George Bush. I declined, but not because I thought such a working was unmerited. George Bush was a disaster. But at the time literally everything that happened was working in the man’s favor. All ‘coincidences’ helped him. It seemed to me larger patterns were at work, patterns so strong that facing them head-on was unwise.
I counseled waiting.
Of course it seemed in the Britain of the early ’40s that everything was also working in Hitler’s favor when the witch working against him occurred. But the difference was that the realm of relevant possible choices had become very small and focused. Either Hitler would invade, or he would not. The message was not to undo Hitler or overthrow him, but to prevent a specific possible outcome that was Hitler’s choice to make.
Had the plan I was invited to participate in been similarly specific – say, to save the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge – I would probably have participated. I suspect such workings were in fact done, Against all odds, the refuge has still not been drilled.
Effective ritual is not invincible – but it shifts the energetic probabilities, and in the absence of effective opposition can make a significant difference for the better.
George Bush is gone from office. The Republicans are deeply discredited with any people who put love of country ahead of love of party. A black man who is part African, with the middle name Hussein, is President. His and his allies’ opponents are organized in a way only dreamed of a few years back. Many of these outcomes appear to have depended on Bush being President long enough to discredit a style of politics among many who had earlier fond it attractive. These positive outcomes were inconceivable for the most part when my friend asked me to help in the working against Bush.
I cannot say this Bush’s presidency has been to the ultimate good for our country or humankind. Thousands of dead Americans, and hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis suggest otherwise. And that is just a beginning of my bill of particulars regarding the Bush presidency. But we do not see the bigger picture. So I suggest the place for magick in politics is very focused and narrow. That principle works best for magick in general, and reflects the knowledge and focus we can reasonably bring to bear on a issue.



posted February 6, 2009 at 6:02 am
Ritual of this sort is at the opposite end of the spectrum from most meditative work. The latter is open focused, and the former closed focused. The question is, when is closed focused work appropriate and when is it harmful and obsessive, for there is no question that closed focused work can be terribly obsessive and based on the lower nature. This is valid whether we are talking about ritual as purely psychological or as something that involves a collective will and perhaps effects that are less visible and obvious.
posted February 6, 2009 at 6:54 am
“Many of these outcomes appear to have depended on Bush being President long enough to discredit a style of politics among many who had earlier fond it attractive.”
An interesting perspective. ANd the more I think about it the more accurate it seems. After 8 years of George W Bush more Americans were ready for change and were not willing to settle for more of the same – so perhaps he served his purpose.
posted February 6, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Ah yes, the old story about the witches stopping Hitler from invading England. How wonderful, how utterly ethical. Of course they slept well at night in their comfortable beds, so much more comfortable than the beds in the camps that just might have been emptied a little be sooner if the witches of England had been less concerned with their damnable ethics and did a psychic assassination instead.
And they wonder why Magicians hold them in such contempt.
posted February 6, 2009 at 1:44 pm
To Albert the Abstainer
True to a point. Wicca is not focused on meditation, though I personally meditate. A spiritual practice that focuses on living in harmony IN the world will have a different mix of practices (and dangers and kinds of abuse, that you point out) than one that concentrates on getting off the Wheel of Life rather than dancing more successfully on it as it turns.
Chuck Cosmiano
If you had read my post very carefully, I think you would have written something different. Just to recapitulate a few points:
1. Assassination would not have necessarily stopped the invasion
2, For most people the worst of the camps were unknown till after the war.
3. It’s rather hard to do psychic assassination. Have you ever tried it?
4. I never claimed I knew it worked, only that given the logic of this kind of ritual, this is what it would have taken to maximize the likelihood of success, and he did not invade.
5, I’m impressed that you know what Magicians, all of them, think of Wiccans. I know some who would differ with you. I was introduced to Wicca by a person who specialized in ritual magick.
posted February 6, 2009 at 5:33 pm
I’ve found that the best way to ensure a successful Magickal working is to have a simple focal point. You’re right that using phrases such as “world peace” or “love” upon which to concentrate energy are far too vague to be effective. I find that a few words – or even one when you can manage it (such as “Heal”) will facilitate concentration. They chose their focal point well.
posted February 8, 2009 at 8:49 pm
“It’s rather hard to do psychic assassination. Have you ever tried it?”
Quoted for truth.
posted February 9, 2009 at 7:30 pm
“”"And they wonder why Magicians hold them in such contempt.”"”
*******************************************************************
Those who “hold contempt” for others, emply by so doing that they are ‘better’ than those they hold contempt for. Which is contemptable indeed.