On a high hill top Neolithic hunters and gatherers gradually built a complex of circular structures of stone megaliths, each highly shaped and in many cases with carved animals no longer present on them. No dwellings have been found anywhere close to these ruins, and archaeologists estimate they took at least 500 people to build, over a considerable period of time. After centuries of use they then covered it up with soil carried to the top, where the stones and other artifacts remained undiscovered until only a few years ago.
Coming upon these ruins shortly after their being discovered by German archaeologists, our presenters had themselves doing research on the possibility that modern Paganism had its roots in Harran, a fascinating city near this region. But that's for another day. When they first visited the site was open to the few visitors who knew bout it, though as the word has since spread, visitors can no longer go up to the stones themselves.
Today members of the "Frew Expedition" presented an up to date report on the most recent discoveries, many still only published in German and Turkish, including the discovery of stone rings of different sizes, some very large, more carvings, and the excavation of villages nearly as old in the surrounding country, each with a circle of smaller stone megaliths. But it will take years to excavate this site, let alone come to a more complete understanding of what happened here.
What we know is amazing enough. The region must have been very rich in plants and animals, even though it is a near wasteland now. The chief meat source, to judge from bones, was gazelles. There were no domesticated animals beyond, perhaps, dogs. The quantities of animals needed to sustain villages able to provide so much labor was immense. The only wheat found on the site is wild wheat, agriculture not yet having been established. It must have been a rich land indeed.
Today it is barren, essentially one vast and eroded region of chalk, with what soil remains hidden in small areas able to support a little grass. Lit tleexists now except for the ruins on top, except for vast eroded hills of chalk.
Göbekli Tepe or nearby is possibly where agriculture originated. The demands for food from settled villages able to perform this much labor likely did great damage to the local ecology. As animal and bird life declined, people would have looked for substitutes, and the wild wheat of the area is ancestral to today's wheat. We also know the first evidence of domesticated wheat stems from shortly after this site was built. Agriculture did not lead to settlement, settlement led to agriculture.
The very barrenness of the region, settled for such an immense period, also warns us of the adverse ecological impact of human settlements lacking a means to see the damage they are doing to their environment. Glenn Turner who was one of those who had gone observed "everything has been scoured." The decline would have been slow, as soil was washed away from the hills over millennia of agriculture and the grazing of goats. Each generation on average would have seen only a small change for the worse.
I have a renewed appreciation for the value of writing and photography, that we may better grasp the dire impact we are having on our world ecologically. Whether it will be enough to reverse our record, time alone will tell.
Today, as is becoming better known, many groups are trying to incorporate the discovery into their own imagined pasts. The most common is that this was the Garden of Eden. In one way this makes some sense, for once it was a place of enormous productivity, now gone, though there is a marked shortage of angels with flaming swords to keep us from visiting. Be careful of the information you find on the web, though the pictures are wonderful. The areas excavation has only just begin and there is much more to be discovered.
Coming upon these ruins shortly after their being discovered by German archaeologists, our presenters had themselves doing research on the possibility that modern Paganism had its roots in Harran, a fascinating city near this region. But that's for another day. When they first visited the site was open to the few visitors who knew bout it, though as the word has since spread, visitors can no longer go up to the stones themselves.
Today members of the "Frew Expedition" presented an up to date report on the most recent discoveries, many still only published in German and Turkish, including the discovery of stone rings of different sizes, some very large, more carvings, and the excavation of villages nearly as old in the surrounding country, each with a circle of smaller stone megaliths. But it will take years to excavate this site, let alone come to a more complete understanding of what happened here.
What we know is amazing enough. The region must have been very rich in plants and animals, even though it is a near wasteland now. The chief meat source, to judge from bones, was gazelles. There were no domesticated animals beyond, perhaps, dogs. The quantities of animals needed to sustain villages able to provide so much labor was immense. The only wheat found on the site is wild wheat, agriculture not yet having been established. It must have been a rich land indeed.
Today it is barren, essentially one vast and eroded region of chalk, with what soil remains hidden in small areas able to support a little grass. Lit tleexists now except for the ruins on top, except for vast eroded hills of chalk.
Göbekli Tepe or nearby is possibly where agriculture originated. The demands for food from settled villages able to perform this much labor likely did great damage to the local ecology. As animal and bird life declined, people would have looked for substitutes, and the wild wheat of the area is ancestral to today's wheat. We also know the first evidence of domesticated wheat stems from shortly after this site was built. Agriculture did not lead to settlement, settlement led to agriculture.
The very barrenness of the region, settled for such an immense period, also warns us of the adverse ecological impact of human settlements lacking a means to see the damage they are doing to their environment. Glenn Turner who was one of those who had gone observed "everything has been scoured." The decline would have been slow, as soil was washed away from the hills over millennia of agriculture and the grazing of goats. Each generation on average would have seen only a small change for the worse.
I have a renewed appreciation for the value of writing and photography, that we may better grasp the dire impact we are having on our world ecologically. Whether it will be enough to reverse our record, time alone will tell.
Today, as is becoming better known, many groups are trying to incorporate the discovery into their own imagined pasts. The most common is that this was the Garden of Eden. In one way this makes some sense, for once it was a place of enormous productivity, now gone, though there is a marked shortage of angels with flaming swords to keep us from visiting. Be careful of the information you find on the web, though the pictures are wonderful. The areas excavation has only just begin and there is much more to be discovered.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Were those herds of gazelle migratory? Each year Thompsons' gazelles in Kenya move across great distances in search of better grazing and the annual wildebeest migration from the plains of Serengeti to Masai Mara in Kenya is well documented. In most pastoral hunter-gatherer societies, the presence of buck is intermittent, sometimes plentiful and sometimes absent, necessitating the search for other food sources, such as fish or birds.
Why did the gazelle not move away from human predators as they would a herd of lion? That would have caused the same depleted meat resources as over-hunting. And is it not possible that other factors such as drought or disease contributed to the demise of the gazelle - or do the fossils indicate something else?
How fascinating.
For goddesses' sake, why did the gazells not move away from human predators? A pagan can't venture an answer to that question?
Intereting!
Your post reminds me that, whatever the details, we humans, started out small in scale, much smaller than we have become during our history. Perhaps the Deities were similarly small in scale?
I've been to the site, and I know the German archaeologist. I wrote a comment and tried to post it, but I was informed that my comment was WRONG. I was only trying to correct some to the errors in the original and crass comments that had been added. But I'm not going to try to type it all again, and risk being told that it is WRONG.
The Nov/Dec issue of Archaeology had an article on this site. Their website has an abstract and some photos. Just in case you'd like to see a few more images. :-)
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.