Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
One of the things I like best about Pantheacon is the opportunity to get up to date on new research and discoveries in research on ancient sites of interest to Pagans. And few times are more ancient than Göbekli Tepe, a ancient sacred site in Southeast Turkey that is over 12,000 years old, three times older than Stonehenge. That is before the rise of either agriculture or pottery, and during the last ice age, when glacier still dominated much of Europe and North America. The first presentation was in 2006, shortly after it had been discovered, and its amazing age determined. Yesterday we got an update. or great photos, see here.
On a high hill top Neolithic hunters and gatherers gradually built a complex of circular structures of stone megaliths, each highly shaped and in many cases with carved animals no longer present on them. No dwellings have been found anywhere close to these ruins, and archaeologists estimate they took at least 500 people to build, over a considerable period of time. After centuries of use they then covered it up with soil carried to the top, where the stones and other artifacts remained undiscovered until only a few years ago.
Coming upon these ruins shortly after their being discovered by German archaeologists, our presenters had themselves doing research on the possibility that modern Paganism had its roots in Harran, a fascinating city near this region. But that’s for another day. When they first visited the site was open to the few visitors who knew bout it, though as the word has since spread, visitors can no longer go up to the stones themselves.
Today members of the “Frew Expedition” presented an up to date report on the most recent discoveries, many still only published in German and Turkish, including the discovery of stone rings of different sizes, some very large, more carvings, and the excavation of villages nearly as old in the surrounding country, each with a circle of smaller stone megaliths. But it will take years to excavate this site, let alone come to a more complete understanding of what happened here.
What we know is amazing enough. The region must have been very rich in plants and animals, even though it is a near wasteland now. The chief meat source, to judge from bones, was gazelles. There were no domesticated animals beyond, perhaps, dogs. The quantities of animals needed to sustain villages able to provide so much labor was immense. The only wheat found on the site is wild wheat, agriculture not yet having been established. It must have been a rich land indeed.
Today it is barren, essentially one vast and eroded region of chalk, with what soil remains hidden in small areas able to support a little grass. Lit tleexists now except for the ruins on top, except for vast eroded hills of chalk.
Göbekli Tepe or nearby is possibly where agriculture originated. The demands for food from settled villages able to perform this much labor likely did great damage to the local ecology. As animal and bird life declined, people would have looked for substitutes, and the wild wheat of the area is ancestral to today’s wheat. We also know the first evidence of domesticated wheat stems from shortly after this site was built. Agriculture did not lead to settlement, settlement led to agriculture.
The very barrenness of the region, settled for such an immense period, also warns us of the adverse ecological impact of human settlements lacking a means to see the damage they are doing to their environment. Glenn Turner who was one of those who had gone observed “everything has been scoured.” The decline would have been slow, as soil was washed away from the hills over millennia of agriculture and the grazing of goats. Each generation on average would have seen only a small change for the worse.
I have a renewed appreciation for the value of writing and photography, that we may better grasp the dire impact we are having on our world ecologically. Whether it will be enough to reverse our record, time alone will tell.
Today, as is becoming better known, many groups are trying to incorporate the discovery into their own imagined pasts. The most common is that this was the Garden of Eden. In one way this makes some sense, for once it was a place of enormous productivity, now gone, though there is a marked shortage of angels with flaming swords to keep us from visiting. Be careful of the information you find on the web, though the pictures are wonderful. The areas excavation has only just begin and there is much more to be discovered.



posted February 16, 2009 at 6:45 pm
I am struck by the finding that a complex of stone megaliths was raised by a pre-agricultural people; I had thought that working with stone on that scale was probably something that came (naturally enough) with the need to remove stone from fields used in intensive agriculture.
More than that, though, my imagination is caught, picturing a landscape of gazelles, softly blowing grain, and humans, already working together on a large scale. The great thing about assumptions is having them blown away…
And, yes, I hope we can let in the environmental lesson, before we lose much more of the richness of the planet.
posted February 16, 2009 at 7:49 pm
Sanctuary my rear end! It’s a fortification. The carvings are interesting but the layout is consistent with a defensive position.
posted February 16, 2009 at 10:46 pm
Couple of points. The rock is chalk and easy to work. Their tools were obsidian, flint, and antlers.
It’s not a fortification. Read the wikipedia entry for a start.
gus
posted February 17, 2009 at 3:40 am
Were those herds of gazelle migratory? Each year Thompsons’ gazelles in Kenya move across great distances in search of better grazing and the annual wildebeest migration from the plains of Serengeti to Masai Mara in Kenya is well documented. In most pastoral hunter-gatherer societies, the presence of buck is intermittent, sometimes plentiful and sometimes absent, necessitating the search for other food sources, such as fish or birds.
Why did the gazelle not move away from human predators as they would a herd of lion? That would have caused the same depleted meat resources as over-hunting. And is it not possible that other factors such as drought or disease contributed to the demise of the gazelle – or do the fossils indicate something else?
How fascinating.
posted February 17, 2009 at 11:09 am
For goddesses’ sake, why did the gazells not move away from human predators? A pagan can’t venture an answer to that question?
posted February 17, 2009 at 12:50 pm
Intereting!
Your post reminds me that, whatever the details, we humans, started out small in scale, much smaller than we have become during our history. Perhaps the Deities were similarly small in scale?
posted February 23, 2009 at 6:11 am
I’ve been to the site, and I know the German archaeologist. I wrote a comment and tried to post it, but I was informed that my comment was WRONG. I was only trying to correct some to the errors in the original and crass comments that had been added. But I’m not going to try to type it all again, and risk being told that it is WRONG.
posted February 23, 2009 at 3:55 pm
The Nov/Dec issue of Archaeology had an article on this site. Their website has an abstract and some photos. Just in case you’d like to see a few more images.