Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
Huffington Post has a report on many decades of sexual and physical abuse of thousands of Irish children by priests and nuns in Catholic run reform schools. ( I do not want to be accused of just picking on Protestants in Africa and their American supporters. )
According to Shawn Pogatchnik “Wednesday’s five-volume report on the probe _ which was resisted by Catholic religious orders _ concluded that church officials shielded their orders’ pedophiles from arrest amid a culture of self-serving secrecy.”
It reminded me of a class I taught years ago at Notre Dame College in California. Students read a paper I had written about the predilection of large organizations to lie, and why they did so. I had a number of case histories, including reports of how the Church in Ireland and California had covered up abuse of children by priests. Some of my students scoffed, claiming the reports simply had to be exaggerated.
They shut up when an Irish graduate student who was also taking the course told them that he had been one of the children abused. And no, there was no exaggeration.
Back to the current report: Ireland’s Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse concluded by saying “A climate of fear, created by pervasive, excessive and arbitrary punishment, permeated most of the institutions and all those run for boys. Children lived with the daily terror of not knowing where the next beating was coming from.”
As usual, once exposed, the Church offered apologies and regrets. But also as usual representatives of the Church had opposed doing a report and one of the orders responsible, the ‘Christian (sic) Brothers’ had sued and won in 2004 to keep names secret.
The Church’s regrets’ might ring more true if this had been an isolated example. But it was not. Canada has admitted to even worse atrocities against native children who had been forcibly taken from their homes and incarcerated in church run ‘schools’ where up to 69% died. By comparison the sexual abuse and torture that took place there was minor. Most such schools were Catholic, though Canada’s other major denominations were involved as well. These crimes against children took place from the late 19th century until the 1970s. As usual, last month the Pope expressed his ‘regrets’ over these atrocities as well.



posted May 21, 2009 at 10:10 am
You taught at Notre Dame de Namur University in California? What about all that “Servants of Sauron” jazz (see previous post)? That is a wonderful school and the sisters are great. Well, happy Ascension Thursday. I’m going to mass at noon.
posted May 21, 2009 at 10:44 am
Fine school. I am referring to the depraved people in positions of authority who did nothing. I have never never suggested all Catholics are servants of Sauron.
When you get back, read more closely next time.
posted May 21, 2009 at 11:57 am
I am reminded of the South Park episode where the minister in South Park goes to the Vatican to confront the spider creature running behind the scenes of the papacy. Good episode.
posted May 21, 2009 at 1:44 pm
I knew it it didn’t refernce all Catholics, or all Christians for that matter, but I did wonder who it did apply to. I also wondered if “Servants of Sauron” was a pure Tolkein fantasy reference or if another group had appropriated the term to describe a modern group. As fate would have it, I have the book right here in my office.
posted May 21, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Fair enough!
I have started using it to refer to all elements of the religious right. It clearly has a Tolkienish playful side and rolls nicely off the tongue. But there is a very serious side withut which I would not use it.
The ideal of a supreme deity that the religious right seems to emphasize has the following characteristics:
Arbitrary Power is His major quality
Absolute obedience on pain to hell for eternity is His good news.
Blind commitment to a God of arbitrary power trumps all evidence of fact or truth.
They disproportionately favor aggressive war agains thtose with whom they disagree, torture even if designed by Communist regimes to elicit FALSE confessions, and spreading fear at every opportunity.
If I believed in Satan, I’d call them Satanists. But I don’t. So I picked ol’ Sauron.
posted May 21, 2009 at 9:52 pm
Sauron is a very apt characterization. We should get some T-shirts made up with the flaming eye and something like “What would He do..” Give it out as a quarterly prize to the worst offenders