A Pagan's Blog

A Pagan's Blog

Why Private Auto Insurance Works for Everybody and Private Health Insurance Does Not

posted by Gus diZerega | 12:11pm Tuesday June 30, 2009

I am amazed that I have heard so little as to why the purely private option no longer works for medical insurance and never will again.  The reason lies in the very logic of capitalism and the market.  While right wingers have made the national debate pretty mindless over health care, as over everything else, I will do my little bit today to add some rationality.

Insurance works on the principle that a certain number of people in a population will need help, that number is predictable, but we have no idea who among the population will be the ones affected.  Therefore we pool our resources to cover everyone’s risk, a few paying less than they will need, most paying more (because they will need nothing) and everyone being safe from the financial impact of that particular disaster.  It is very simple logic, and works for car insurance, home insurance, and many other kinds of insurance.

It does not work for medical insurance.


The reason is simple.  With the growth of scientific knowledge the pools keep getting sliced smaller and smaller.  We can tell who is likely to need insurance the most, and if they are excluded from a pool. We can offer lower competitive rates to those included than can a company that does not exclude those most likely to need help.  Very simple.

We see a version of this issue with auto insurance.  Rates go up as we accumulate points in moving violations because we are more likely to need insurance.  But unlike health insurance, we can alter our behavior so that rates go down.  Or as we get older, rates go down, at least until a certain point.  Here the variability of insurance rates is probably beneficial.  In health insurance it is mostly a disaster.

The result is that some medical insurance that to those statistically needing it least, can be good.  Others are priced out, or can get it only if they have a job that provides it.   As a result in America people keep crappy jobs because of the insurance, avoid starting their own businesses because they do not want to put their families at risk,and at a rapidly rising rate, go into bankruptcy over medical bills: 62 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were due to medical debts, around 46 percent in 2001 and only 8 percent in 1981.   The LA Times has a good summary and some heart wrenching examples.  

To make matters even worse, profit-minded insurance companies are
dropping the needy as soon as they can figure out a means to do so.  As Businessweek reported, the author of a recent Harvard based report published in the Journal of American Medicine said:

“For middle-class Americans, health insurance offers little protection.
Most of us have policies with so many loopholes, co-payments, and
deductibles that illness can put you in the poorhouse,” said lead
author Himmelstein. “Unless you’re Warren Buffett, your family is just
one serious illness away from bankruptcy.

All the pompous free market talk about the “miracle of the market” is so much blather because those emitting such sounds do not understand WHY a ‘free market’ works in some cases for insurance and not in others.  They treat it like a magickal phrase.  I am reminded of the behavior of members of a cargo cult.

All this assumes the insurance companies are honest.  Now Congressional investigators have discovered they are not.  I am not surprised.  Corporations are designed to act like rational sociopaths, and it is small wonder that human sociopaths have an edge in rising ti the tops, men and women who cheerfully bilk people when they are the most vulnerable, to feather their already overly large beds.

Single payer is far and away the most logical form by which health insurance can be provided because it returns us to insuring the entire pool, all of us.  Anyone who has taken much time to look at how it has been applied elsewhere knows that compared to the American model, by every measure of price, coverage, and overall quality that includes the population as a whole, it has proven superior.



Previous Posts

Where to in 2010?
I have not been doing much political posting for many months, ever since I finally gave up hope that the Democrats, with a few exceptions, amounted to anything  more than a somewhat more humane version of the moral filth that the Republicans now represent. Of course I will vote Democratic in Novemb

posted 5:29:00pm Feb. 04, 2012 | read full post »

Delving into the meaning of Brigid
In 2010 I wrote in this blog “Imbolc is one of the less intensely celebrated Sabbats, I think because it has fewer real world connections in our lives.  In most places the coming Spring Equinox, Ostara, is well suited to its symbolism of the triumph of the sun and powers of growth and regeneratio

posted 1:03:27am Jan. 31, 2012 | read full post »

Important scientific argument that the world and everything in it is alive
UPDATE  below Science Daily reports on a new theory by Erik D. Andrulis that if true demonstrates the earth is alive.  The peer reviewed journal Life has just published Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life, which argues the earth is alive . Andrulis writes: "In the theory pro

posted 7:10:06pm Jan. 27, 2012 | read full post »

A Pagan in the Buckle: thoughts on my time at a Pentecostal service
I have been slow in writing this post because I have wanted to do my experience justice.  In late November I crossed the country, stopping off in Lawrence Kansas for Thanksgiving with family before returning to California.  Starting from the east coast, on my way to Kansas I visited friends who ha

posted 12:28:11am Jan. 24, 2012 | read full post »

What's with all the fuss about SOPA and PIPA?
A friend of mine well versed in these matters and appreciative of problems on both sides has recommended this analysis as the best she has come across for understanding the issues at stake and why we should care.

posted 12:34:32pm Jan. 18, 2012 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(16)
post a comment
Anonymous

posted June 30, 2009 at 3:10 pm


Healthcare reform proposed by the Federal Government may actually eliminate affordable medical insurance from the private sector entirely.
While publicly funded healthcare may seem to create affordable medical insurance for more Americans, it may actually create a bigger problem.



report abuse
 

MaryAnne

posted June 30, 2009 at 3:19 pm


(Much of what happens these days puts me in mind of cargo cults. “If we keep spending, prosperity will return…”)



report abuse
 

Thomas

posted June 30, 2009 at 3:51 pm


There’s also the issue of elasticity of demand. With normal goods, one can simply decide not to purchase. The same is not true of health care. Dying is not a viable economic choice. As a result, those companies involved in providing or facilitating health care can charge as much, often even more, than the market will bear.



report abuse
 

Gus diZerega

posted June 30, 2009 at 3:57 pm


Partly so, Thomas, but a lot of people are deferring health care and check ups. Deferral is often rational from an individal perspective given today’s realities, but it irrational from a social one because prevention is usually cheaper than cure or amelioration.
In addition, an issue I did not bring up, health insurance is locally often quite monopolistic or oligopolistic, and apparently becoming more so. This sad fact strengthens Thomas’s point.
see
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/study-confirms-health-monopoly-fears



report abuse
 

Maritzia

posted June 30, 2009 at 6:55 pm


Many people defer preventive care because they can’t afford it. Even with a copay, it’s too expensive for some folks to be able to pay for the doctor and the medical tests involved. When I had my first preventive colonoscopy, it cost me over $500 out of pocket. And I had good health insurance. But for a secretary making $33000 a year, $500 is a great deal of money.
Now, since I was laid off last year, I have no health insurance. I’ve been deferring doctor visits and bloodwork until the doctor wouldn’t refill my meds anymore.
In the meantime, private insurance companies are making record profits.



report abuse
 

New Age Cowboy

posted June 30, 2009 at 10:32 pm


Gus, I lived in South Korea. I was an English teacher there. I thought I had testicular cancer and had to access the government health care via my employer. It was awesome: cheap and thorough. I didn’t even need any appointments or referrals.
I dunno. Americans are suckers for capitalism. I’m starting to think that I’m a Communist/Marxist. I do enjoy benefits of marketed technologies, but at what cost to necessities?



report abuse
 

Low Key

posted June 30, 2009 at 10:41 pm


I agree something needs to be done. The existing system does not work but the government has proved to be incompetent at EVERYTHING, even those things that government is supposed to be good at. It looks like a no win situation to me. Where’s Captain Kirk when we need him.



report abuse
 

Artor

posted July 1, 2009 at 10:05 am


A Public Option is not going to run private insurance out of business, but it will provide a new competitive model that is sadly lacking. As long as there is a standard that everyone can access, market pressures will drive out those insurers that don’t offer something better, but any private group that can surpass the public offering will do just fine. Those who have money to burn for superior insurance will still be able to get it, but the rest of us who have nothing now will have a badly needed safety net.
I’ve been uninsured since I finished school, except for 2 yrs when my employer offered coverage. It was cancelled because it was too expensive, and my boss couldn’t afford to keep it up. I spend a significant portion of my income to keep my kid covered, but if I get sick or injured myself, I’m completely screwed.
I have no sympathy for greedy insurance companies that line their pockets at the expense of the needy & the vulnerable. If they go out of business, it is a sign that justice still exists in the world.



report abuse
 

genie

posted July 1, 2009 at 11:39 am


As a Canadian who only has lived in a single payer system, I wonder if the US has the kind of societal consensus necessary to make the tough decisions that a single payer system must. American society seems polarized on many issues that are central in a single payer system – contraception, abortion, “futile” care, assisted reproduction, etc.



report abuse
 

Franklin Evans

posted July 1, 2009 at 12:20 pm


Good and valid observations of government bureaucracy aside (just for the moment), the vast majority of people simply do not understand how insurance works. Gus made a good start in explaining it. It bears repeating often (though I’ll refrain).
The crux of the problem is profit. A for-profit insurance approach will, by definition, fail to cover some people. How many is based on how profitable each carrier tries to be.
It actually doesn’t matter how health care cost is covered. What matters is whether those covering it are trying to make a profit. Health care reform should start with the decision to make it not-for-profit, and elevate it to the same level of national mandate as national defense.



report abuse
 

Thermal

posted July 1, 2009 at 1:00 pm


South Korea is not a communist/marxist nation. Actually I don’t think there are any real communist countries left. China clearly is not really communist, and the healthcare system there is sorely lacking.
Since communism/marxism has proven to fail into simple feudalism, it will probably be as unable to provide decent health insurance as the Corporate feudalism which masquerades as capitalism in America today. The countries which have the best healthcare systems as evidenced by low infant mortality rates, long lifespans, and low levels of untreated epidemic and endemic diseases seem to be the ones with capitalist-based highly democratic semi-socialist governments.
I don’t trust governments to do anything right, but I trust Corporations even less. At least government as practiced now in America is somewhat transparent and must eventually answer to the folks who elect the politicians. Corporations are entities which are legally created to shield their directors from liability for their actions, and whose goals are specifically the merciless creation of maximum profits. Either capitalism or communism, when not regulated by a self-interested and self-serving electorate, will fall quickly into feudalism, in which a few overlords hold control over most property, and everyone else winds up serving them.
No matter the name of the governing system, the core of getting good healthcare will be weeding the parasites and predators out of the system.
Sadly, it seems many of our politicians have their hands in the pockets of the parasites and predators.
Thermal
New Age Cowboy said;
June 30, 2009 10:32 PM
Gus, I lived in South Korea. I was an English teacher there. I thought I had testicular cancer and had to access the government health care via my employer. It was awesome: cheap and thorough. I didn’t even need any appointments or referrals.
I dunno. Americans are suckers for capitalism. I’m starting to think that I’m a Communist/Marxist. I do enjoy benefits of marketed technologies, but at what cost to necessities?



report abuse
 

Franco

posted July 21, 2009 at 4:17 am


Franklin,
I do agree with you, but you have to remember that insurance companies are there to make money, they will suck every little penny out of your pocket of you give them the chance



report abuse
 

Gus diZerega

posted July 21, 2009 at 10:53 am


Franco is right – as health insurance demonstrates. What keeps it from happening with autos and such is genuine competition and genuinely big pools.
I notice that even the libertarians that occasionally comment on this blog have done nothing to challenge the logic of this post! Nor have they in other venues where I’ve challenged them. Ignoring an argument you can’t defeat is the best approach if purity trumps truth.
As to conservative opponents – they abandoned any concern with truth a long time ago.



report abuse
 

Julie Johnson

posted March 18, 2010 at 11:39 pm


What a good question… ANd I also agree with your statement above :)
Find cheap auto insurance Texas



report abuse
 

David B

posted October 8, 2010 at 5:12 pm


This is why I made a choice not to sell health insurance. After specializing in property and casualty for 10 years, I thought I had a good grasp of how companies worked…
That is, until I took it upon myself to learn about health insurance. Learning the “ins” and “outs” of major medical kept leading to the following words: ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Now that the dust is settling, let’s see how the industry reacts to the new mandates. It does not look good for private health insurance.



report abuse
 

Auto Insurance In Atlanta

posted April 1, 2011 at 11:16 am


It is unfortunate that people prolong health care and check ups because of the inherent costs associated with these services. Maybe there will be a day when the majority can afford such coverage and care… sigh…



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.