Here are some interesting factoids on the GOP and conservatives' war on empathy - and I would suggest their war on basic humanity in general.
First, consider both the hypocrisy and the extreme stupidity of the following two comments by Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. (The link lets you hear him or read him.)
It's pretty clear that Senator Coburn simply does not much know what the word 'empathy' means. Perhaps because he has so little of it himself.
Second, this interpretation becomes all the more reasonable when we look at these words about "compassionate conservatism" by a prominant conservative who admits the term as used by most of the right is meaningless, Jonah Goldberg, editor of National Review.
As countless writers have noted in National Review over the last five years, most conservatives never really understood what compassionate conservatism was, beyond a convenient marketing slogan to attract swing voters. The reality--as even some members of the Bush team will sheepishly concede--is that there was nothing behind the curtain. Sure, in the hands of Marvin Olasky and others, compassionate conservatism had some heft. But Karl Rove's translation of it into a political platform made it into a pseudo-intellectual rationale for constituent-pleasing and Nixonian "modern Republicanism."
Goldberg point is underlined by Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele who derided "crazy nonsense empathetic." And added "I'll give you empathy. Empathize right on your behind!"
Inability to understand empathy would explain so much about the modern 'conservative' movement. Its tribalism is rooted in the inability of so many to empathetically understand people different from themselves. Its amorality is rooted in the fact, for I believe it is a fact, that those who cannot empathize cannot act from a deeply ethical perspective.
Third, as more and more polls indicate, most Americans are turned off by this failure to set much of an example of human excellence or even decency by the right - long on outrage, longer on hypocrisy. Daily Kos's poll is most revealing:
Do you think empathy is an important characteristic for a Supreme Court Justice to possess or not?
Yes No
18-29 63 17
30-44 47 34
45-59 55 26
60+ 46 35
White 41 39
Black 81 4
Latino 79 4
Other 79 5
Men 48 34
Women 56 24
[...] Same question as above:
Do you think empathy is an important characteristic for a Supreme Court Justice to possess or not?
Yes No
Dem 73 12
GOP 18 56
Ind 54 28

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
For what it's worth, Tom Coburn is the better of the two senators here in Oklahoma.
Our other senator, Jim Inhofe (R, of course), is a rank ideologue who follows the Republican party on every point, whether he has a good reason to or not.
Coburn is frequently wrong, but has a lot more integrity and is willing to cross the aisle. He even co-sponsored with
Barack Obama the bill that created USAspending.gov (the "Google for government" site that Obama mentioned in his speeches and the debates). Coburn seems to be motivated by ideas rather than ideology even if his ideas are frequently wrong.
I'll be honest on my thoughts on this one. I consider the GOP, RR and Conservative Christianity to be a war with the American people and the country, its self. I think these groups have made it quite clear that they want control over the government, its laws and its people and the ability to meet out whatever judgment they think is appropriate.
I view them as a threat to our system of government.
While I’d like to play nice with everyone, there are some groups, religious or secular and political, that have no desire to cooperate with those who are different in their beliefs be it political or religious. To bury ones head and think that we'll all get along is dangerous fantasy. Freedom has its price. While some may think I’m over the edge, which is fine, these groups have publicly said that they want things to run according to their beliefs or religious interpretation. They are a friend to no one but themselves.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.