Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
The spirit of the Burning Times is
alive and well in California. So I
discovered this past weekend at Pantheacon.
For
years Patrick McCollum has worked to provide Pagan ministerial services for
incarcerated Pagans, as is provided by Christian and other monotheistic
religions. For his efforts McCollum has been told by a prison supervisor that according
to the Bible, which he took out and read from, he was commanded to kill
McCollum because “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” Fortunately his fear of the law was
greater than his bigotry and ignorance of accurate translations. But it gets worse.
McCollum is a member of the American Correctional Chaplain
Association, and since 1997 has been a statewide Wiccan chaplain for the
California Department of Correction.
He has also served as a Wiccan chaplain in the Federal Bureau of
Prisons, and helped mentor chaplains from many faith traditions across the
country.
I
myself worked with Pagan prisoners a little bit when I taught at Whitman
College in Walla Walla, Washington, where a major penitentiary is
located. Many inmates deeply appreciate the attention they receive while being
assisted in keeping or strengthening their connection with our Gods. Fortunately Washington is a civilized
state on these issues compared to California.
A staff member of the California
Dept. of Corrections put McCollum in a confined space, attacked the Wiccan
faith while telling McCollum that he, the officer, had been “bathed in the
blood of Jesus.” Later, in the
spirit of Jesus and truth fundamentalist style, he claimed in front of other
correctional officers to have seen videos of McCollum killing children and
drinking blood. These officers
then told inmates of these allegations, leaving McCollum’s life in danger.
A Protestant Chaplain serving
maximum security inmates told them it was their responsibility under God to “do
whatever was necessary to make Wiccan services did not continue and McCollum
could not move forward.”
As McCollum told me, dozens of
high level Department of Corrections officials, wardens, correctional staff,
and many but by no means all correctional chaplains intentionally promoted
discrimination against Wiccans.
There are good people in the State Dept of Corrections, but McCollum
told me they have been rendered powerless by Evangelical bigots and are
sometimes even penalized for objecting to discrimination.
Don’t we have a constitution that
guarantees freedom of religion?
Yes we do, but these people twist its meaning and, if pressed, say, as
one did to McCollum: “The reason Pagans are not getting their rights is because
it’s God’s Will.” When she was
confronted with her responsibilities under California law and the US
Constitution, that as a state administrator she was responsible for following
the law, she replied “I do not answr to the law or the constitution. I only answer to the Lord.”
Enter the Courts
This kind of illegal theocratic
bigotry and worse led to a court case that has been making its way through the
courts for 5 years. Until recently
the Dept. of Corrections argued both in court and publicly that they had been conscientiously seeking to
determine the religious needs of their inmates, and accommodate them. They argued they have a “Fair and
neutral policy” concerning prison chaplains and accommodating minority
faiths. This includes determining
the numbers of inmates with specific religious needs. Of course had they done this there would be no court case.
Now, in both testimony and
deposition, they have admitted they have not applied any of the criteria that
they claimed for five years to be following. As McCollum told me with regard to this claim, “They
admitted that everything they testified to under oath was false.”
Instead California is now arguing
they do not have to take the wishes and needs of Pagan prisoners into account
because they follow a “5 Faiths System.”
Five faiths count: Protestant and Catholic Christianity, Judaism, Islam,
and Native Americans. The rest do
not count as constitutionally protected religions!
This bigoted argument has been
promoted by such as “Justice” Anton Scalia, who argue that the Founders did not know of other religions and so could not
have meant them when trying to safeguard religious liberty. This is an excellent example of
conservative bigotry masquerading as learning since Jefferson wrote in his Notes on Virginia “… it
does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God. It
neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.”
That
Scalia and every conservative who agrees with him is intellectually dishonest
can be easily demonstrated. The
Founders did not know of rifled barrels.
Should the right to keep and bear arms be confined to muzzle loaders? No conservative has ever argued such.
California is backed up in its
bigotry by America’s home grown Taliban, the “Wallbuilders, Inc” a
dominionist organization of bigots who filed an amicus brief supporting
California. So far as I know they
are the only amicus brief submitted on California’s behalf, which says a
lot. That so-called liberal Jerry
Brown is California’s Attorney General says volumes as to what the lust for
office will do to a man who once was worth something as a politician.
As
McCollum told me. “One of the primary and central issues of this case has
always been discrimination against the Pagan inmates.”The case will be heard by
the 9th Circuit Court and the stakes are high. If California and Fundamentalist
bigotry stands, a precedent will be established to undermine religious toleration
for every other faith in the state.
What
Can We Do?
Write
the Governor of California. This is a federal case, so you do NOT
have to be a California resident to make your views known. If California prevails, similar efforts
will be made in other states.
Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160
For the same reason write
California’s Attorney General.
Edmund G. Brown, jr.
Attorney General’s Office
California Department of
Justice
Attn: Public Inquiry Unit
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
And
write the Secretary of the California Dept. of Corrections.
Matthew
Cate
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
P.O. Box 942883
Sacramento, CA 94283-0001.
916-445-1773
(I think this is the correct address)
State
that you want a state-wide truly fair and neutral policy that includes equal
accommodations of Pagans and other minority religions based on religiously
neutral criteria.



posted February 18, 2010 at 4:58 pm
As McCollum told me with regard to this claim, “They admitted that everything they testified to under oath was false.”
Perjury is still a crime, isn’t it? Perhaps some of these DoC officials need to spend some time on the other side of the bars.
posted February 18, 2010 at 6:08 pm
Patrick urged me not to use the “P” word because apparently it is complicated to prove.
Let us simply say they lied. To the people of California and to the courts.
posted February 18, 2010 at 6:30 pm
I’m Catholic, but this kind of stuff is inexcusable. Attacking the religious freedom of some ultimately is attacking the religious freedom of all. I’ll be sure to write to the addresses you provided, and thank you for getting the word out.
posted February 18, 2010 at 7:50 pm
I’ll write too Gus. The word will definitely get out.
posted February 18, 2010 at 8:24 pm
Totally flabbergasting. If this sort of treatment were meted out to U.S. prisoners of war by an enemy, it would be characterized as “war crimes” and “atrocities.”
Unfortunately, the International Criminal Court concerns itself only with the most egregious of crimes against humanity, but there is always the U.N. Human Rights Council, and Amnesty International. Perhaps the conditions in California’s prisons should be raised in those forums. Not that California or the U.S. appears to care about what the rest of the world thinks, but as a warning to people from other countries who may be planning on travelling to the U.S., or on investing in the U.S.
posted February 18, 2010 at 10:19 pm
A minor correction, but these things are important. The Attorney General of California is Edmund G. Brown junior, Edmund G. Brown was his father Governor “Pat” Brown.
posted February 19, 2010 at 2:11 am
Thanks! Jaundiced is right. I’ve made the correction.
posted February 20, 2010 at 1:32 pm
Thanks for this, Gus. Patrick’s story of his long and hard-fought battle is truly a jaw-dropper. I will be interviewing Patrick tomorrow morning, 9-10 Pacific time on KOWS 107.3 fm in Occidental, CA. The show will be streaming on the web at http://bit.ly/aLc9Ge and I will post a podcast of the interview on my Blog o’ Gnosis site http://gnosiscafe.com/gcblog later that day.
Tune in if you’d like an update in Patrick’s own words!
posted February 24, 2010 at 7:08 pm
Thanks for this, Gus.
Here’s the letter I wrote:
http://www.thorncoyle.com/musings/?p=21
posted February 24, 2010 at 7:47 pm
Great letter, Thorn. Mine were not so eloquent, alas.
Gus
posted February 24, 2010 at 9:29 pm
My words were far less “appealing” too.