Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
It turns out that immersing ourselves
in Nature is good for us in ways that science can actually measure. A paper published last week, “A Dose of
Nature” Jules Pretty and Jo Barton found that people’s mood
and self-esteem benefit from what it calls “green exercise.” Prof. Pretty said of his study “For the first time in the scientific
literature, we have been able to show dose-response relationships for the
positive effects of nature on human mental health.”
Their findings applied to all ages and both genders, though there
were interesting differences among them.
The biggest benefits applied to the mentally ill, suggesting that my
suspicion modern society may drive us crazy is well founded.
In
a report on the paper, Peter Stanford writes
The study shows, for example, that being in a green environment
is better than being in an urban one in terms of a measurable positive effect
on blood pressure, hormones and stress levels. Intriguingly, it also concludes
that the biggest beneficial boost from exposure to nature is gained within the
initial five minutes of each encounter with the great outdoors. While it
continues to reap a harvest thereafter, the crop of positives diminishes.
Gary
Snyder has written, truly I think, that the spirit of place is the total of all
the energy fields present in a place.
Those of rocks and water, soil and air, plants, animals, fungi, people -
the whole nine yards. This week
I’ll write another blog on things you might try in order to experience this
energy field.
Yesterday I took a long road trip
along small ridge top roads in Sonoma County, stopping frequently to take
photographs and walk around. It
was cleansing as well as beautiful.
Something similar happens to me when I walk from where I live into
downtown Sebastopol, for people here love to plant flowers in their front
yards, but concrete and cars still intrude jarringly at times.
Thanks to AmericaBlog for first turning me onto this.



posted May 10, 2010 at 12:43 pm
Thanks for the reminder. I need to get outside more often. Sometimes the best I can do is my balcony, but ultimately, outdoor time whether urban or forest is beneficial.
posted May 10, 2010 at 4:35 pm
It’s easy to forget that we are as much a part of the natural world as any other living creature, and we need to be surrounded by it as much as a fish needs to be in water.
For me, working in my garden reconnects me to Nature. Having my bare hands in the soil, seeing the life within it, smelling its sweet, earthy scent and watching the plants I tend growing and thriving is my sacred time. After a hard, frustrating day of computer support I’m in desperate need to immerse myself in the breezes, textures, sounds and scents of the natural world and experience the myriad birds, insects and other assorted wildlife that call my garden their home.
If you don’t have your own property to garden, consider volunteering to help care for local parks, green spaces, or community vegetable gardens. Gardening is hard, sweaty work and willing hands are ALWAYS welcome.
posted May 11, 2010 at 3:51 pm
Yeah, but it’s a shame we’re not so good for nature…
posted May 12, 2010 at 3:07 pm
M.A., some of us are VERY good for Nature. Not only in the way we live, but in how we speak up and work in defense of Her.