Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
The growing
crisis in the Gulf of Mexico, caused by BP, coming on the heels of Massey
Energy’s crimes in America’s coal fields
and our rape of Iraq bring us face to face with the question of whether
we have become a pirate culture, existing by taking from the weaker and giving
to the stronger, a national elite of hypocrites and moral monsters, the former
never really looking at what they do, the latter not caring. Energy is a word for power, and power’s
relationship to larger contexts of value, or even simple ethics, has always
been fraught with conflict.
The United
States has always been challenged by the ethical implications of how we obtain
energy, and energy acquisition has always been the seamiest side of this
country. During the American
Revolution a great many of our greatest leaders were from the South,
particularly Virginia. Men like
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison were also vocal
opponents of the slave system, though they could not figure out how to abolish
it. Because they did not,
ultimately it abolished the values to which they dedicated their lives.
Slavery’s moral
degeneracy combined with the high profits it gave slave owners ultimately led
the South to repudiate the principles of the American Revolution. In its place Southern leaders like John
C. Calhoun and those that came after him established an aggressively
authoritarian culture that long after the Civil war still refuses to confront
its failings and evils. Human
rights and Enlightenment reason were abandoned in favor of states rights and
arbitrary power extending from a demon God all the way down to Whites whipping
and later lynching uppity Blacks. We live with its zombie presence to this day,
a culture of the living dead.
Slavery provided
power through the domination and destruction of people. Later forms of power acquisition came
from dominating and destroying Nature- taking and giving back nothing in
return. Whether by taking oil or
taking coal, there was never any sense of reciprocity in modern forms of energy
extraction, no sense of sustainability.
Just take. While it is
uncomfortable to contemplate, I think
Evan Eisenberg’s term for our kind of civilization: “saprophagy” should be better known.
A saprophage
lives off the dead. Many organisms
are saprophages, and we are the better for it, or we would be over our heads in
the corpses of past generations.
But saphrophages like many fungi and microbes convert their bodies to forms
available to empower new generations of flourishing. They are in the service of life. They give back, as all life does except certain human forms,
particularly our own. The energy
that powers our culture comes from taking and not giving back.
To a degree this mentality is inherent
in getting energy from the remains of long dead organisms rather than recently
dead ones. But nothing occurs in isolation, and by its initial success in obtaining power and wealth it also bred a broader mentality of taking and giving nothing in
return. This mentality is not limited to digging up coal and drilling for oil. Only nuclear energy is somewhat more complicated – and it has
extraordinary risks of its own and has not transformed our culture the way
these other forms of energy extraction have.
Obtaining riches
through taking breeds a mentality the opposite of working with the
rhythms of Nature, the opposite of activities like sustainable farming,
logging, fishing, or ranching.
In these other activities Nature is not simply the resource or an impediment to be overcome
in getting the resources. When She
is treated that way the damage arrives fairly rapidly, and the exploiters have
to leave what could, with brains, have produced for millennia. But for oil, gas, and coal extraction, that is all She
is.
Small wonder
that so many in the energy field appear to have the moral sensibilities of
pirates, that they seems to think they have a God-given right to great wealth
from taking these things, regardless of the impact on others. Other communities of people, other ways of life, and animal and plant communities are impediments to their taking, or irrelevant. Perhaps this is why energy companies like dictatorships. They ensure the irrelevance of the locals.
I think today
our obsession with oil and coal is making us as morally corrupt a society as
the ante-bellum South had become a few decades after the American Revolution.
We bomb and kill and support dictatorships across the world in the name of
securing our energy future.
Increasingly we are destroying the earth itself, whether through global
warming, destroying ecosystems, and now through poisoning our own coasts and
destroying the lives of our own people so rich parasites can keep their
millions.
I wonder what
the long term cultural and psychological effects would be of converting
increasingly to wind, solar, biological and tidal energy generation. These do not involve the simple
application of power. They require
a mindset utterly alien to the thugs that run companies like BP and Massey
Energy. And used intelligently
(and in most cases even when used unintelligently) they can last as close to
forever as anything humans are likely to do, making us at last truly native to
this place.



posted June 17, 2010 at 5:39 pm
Hi Gus,
Great post! I agree that we are a society with the mentality of pirates. I also agree we need to start returning to Mother Earth (Gaia) what we take from her. She still provides us with food in the forms of fruits and vegetables in due season, as well as eggs, milk, and meat through the animals she so generously cares for, when we should be helping her in this capacity. I grew up on a pig farm as a child, so I learned that even the animal feces, and afterbirth can and should be retuned to the earth to return at least some nutrients to the soil, that it may in return, give back wheat, corn, rye, or some other form of food.
To apply this to the oil and energy problems: Let’s use ethanol (corn based gas), wind, water, and what ever happened to using wood burning stoves as my grandmothers did? Their homes were very warm and comfortable in the winter.(I live in MN, where it can get brutally cold.) There are cultures in this world that use the whole animal, after killing it, and apologizing for taking it’s life to survive. What’s wrong with us doing the same?
Blessings to you for raising this topic, it is definately needed.
posted June 17, 2010 at 9:18 pm
I object to your characterization of Pirates. Pirate ships were run in a democratic manner with the captain being elected. The portrayal of pirates in the media is closer to what the merchant ships were like and is simply the continuation of anti-pirate propaganda. Pirates raided ships because they were declared outlaws after they mutinied. The merchant ships essentially enslaved their crews and often the only way out was by mutiny.
posted June 18, 2010 at 12:51 am
A cracking good post, Gus.
In Australia, right now, our mining billionaires are spending vast sums on advertising trying to convince voters that our government’s proposal to increase taxes on massive windfall profits (and reduce taxes in other ways) is a bad idea. And the campaign is one of fear, promising massive job losses in those industries if this reform goes ahead. They use the language of self-interest (I would guess it is because that is all they know) all the while calling it the ‘national interest’.
The sad thing is how easily our society accepts this doublethink and the media coverage that questions less and less the motives of those who promote it.
posted June 18, 2010 at 7:53 pm
_Low–Key_,
When I said: …we are a society that has the mentality of pirates.
What I meant (for clarification purposes) was that we have the mentality of Rape, Steal, Kill, and Destroy anything and everything in the way of your objective. I do apologize if you took my comment in a different context than that, I admit that I may have fallen victim to incorrect sociatal depictions of the term I used.
Gavin,
Unfortunately the problem you describe in Australia is also a common problem here in the United States. Alot of our elected polititans are members of major American Oil Drilling families, and so are more concerned about protecting their interests, rather than the country’s interests.
Like I said what about using ethanol (corn based) gas, wood for heat, wind, or water for energy? Anyone else think this sounds just crazy enough to work, and reduce costs for these things??tam
posted June 19, 2010 at 1:17 pm
Low Key-
As I understand it, some pirate ships were reasonably democratically run long ago – maybe now as well, for all that matters to my point. Those are interesting issues but unrelated to the point I was making. I was describing pirates’ relationship to those around them who weren’t pirates.