Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
I took a day off from the chaos of beginning my move when
Theurgicon convened in Berkeley Saturday, August 21. The disruption of the move plus the
wanting to do justice to the richness of the presentations has kept me from
posting until now. But since this subject goes back over 2000 years, I think the lateness of this post in
contemporary terms won’t matter much.
As I mentioned in my post announcing Theurgicon, theurgy is
a late Classical Neoplatonic practice engaging with direct contact with deities
through possessory trance, mediumship, and animated statues. It possesses such powerful similarities
with British Traditional Wicca that some investigators have made powerful
arguments modern Craft’s roots are late Classical rather than Celtic.
As I worked on my write-up, I realized it had become a bit overwhelming for a blog post. So I’ve divided it up into several sections, each oriented around a single presentation and the issues it raises for modern Pagans and my own take on it. That makes commenting on these issues a lot easier. This first deals with Tony Mierzwicki’s historical presentation. It begins below the fold.
Morning sessions began with Tony Mierzwicki’s historical overview beginning with
theurgy’s earliest recorded roots in Egyptian magick, which with later
material, was incorporated into the Hermetica. The Hermetica, along with much
now lost material, was attributed to Hermes Trismegistus, a being sometimes described as a man and more often as a deity conceived
as a blending of the Egyptian Thoth and the Greek Hermes.
Those texts that survived were important in the last late
Classical Pagan center, Harran in what is now southeast Turkey. Harran was where the last Pagan philosophers traveled after being expelled from the Christian and increasingly totalitarian Byzantine Empire. To the surprise of many today, Harran kept its Classical Pagan culture into the 10th
century.
From this last outpost of Classical Civilization, Hermeticism extended its influence in many directions. Within the Islamic world Hermeticism influenced Sufism, the Islamic tradition most recently in the news over the so-called 9-11 Mosque issue. This influence presumably came from its Harranean base deep within the Islamic world which was long
more tolerant than the Christian Empire to the West.
Mierzwicki argued
important Christian Fathers such as Augustine and Tertullian held that Christianity was in some ways the flowering of Hermeticism. I have been unable to verify this claim, but it does
seem as if their influence was not entirely rejected as bad. Many scholars have long emphasized the importance of Neoplatonism as the early church tried to come to terms with the intellectual richness of late Classical culture.
Hermeticism re-entered the West during the Renaissance, initially under
the sponsorship of the d’Medicis. Originally many believed Hermes Trismegistus had been at least as early a figure as Moses, and scholars thought they were finally encountering the true roots of religion. The texts ultimately proved to be much earlier, but Mierzwicki emphasized, reasonably, that while the texts were written in the early CE, the spiritual and magickal material on which they were based was often very old.
Hermeticism flourished in Florence until the city was taken by the
French with Catholic support in 1492.
By this time Hermetic writings had penetrated throughout much of Europe and exercised an important influence throughout the continent.
Mierzwicki argued that central to Hermeticism was the view
that knowledge comes through revelation from divine sources, and not simply
through reason. Here was its core importance, for contemporary philosophy has long denied this and modern religion almost always emphasizes the importance of faith, not personal experience.
During the discussions afterwards I was most intrigued by
those who compared the Hermetica with the Kabbalah of Jewish mysticism in many
of its basic concepts. In Googling around I have been unable to determine how far back the Hermetic influence on Jewish mysticism extends, but perhaps some readers will be able to shed light here.
Why Care?
All this happened a very long time ago, and the very width of Hermetic influences in the West and elsewhere suggests it is anything but narrowly focused towards any particular spiritual practice. In addition, its writings, inspired or not, preceded the modern world and reflects a view of reality modern science has in important respects seemed to replace. Why care?
For modern Pagans there are several reasons we should at least keep an eye on developments within this field. First, Neoplatonism was the final intellectual and spiritual achievement of the Pagan Civilization that most shaped the modern West. It was a culmination of the entire heritage of Mediterranean spirituality. Many of the issues it addressed remain central spiritual questions today for people in all religions, and for that reason alone, we might well pay attention to their answers.
Second, and for me even more importantly, Pagan Neoplatonism appears to be the end of an unbroken line of thinking and practice extending back into the Paleolithic origins of human civilization. By contrast what we have inherited most directly today has been severed from those roots by a totalitarian effort to extirpate that past in word and practice, except for where it could be integrated into the very different world view of what I call Transcendental Monopolistic Monotheism. European Pagans were the first victims of Christian intolerance, and despite their achievements in philosophy, science, and the arts, among the most thoroughly annihilated. We see their achievements through eyes distorted by this intervening disjuncture, and only recently have begun to be aware of the distortions this involves.
Third, if the world is Sacred, as we generally hold, and if the world is aware, as most of us also hold, coming as we do from a society that can accurately be described as autistic to this reality, we need all the help and insight we can get in learning again to communicate with the more-than-human and other-than-human. I think theurgy, as the culmination of Pagan Neoplatonism, offers us important insights.
My next “installment” will cover Brandy Williams’ discussion of the Chaldean Oracles.



posted September 28, 2010 at 12:57 pm
I’d say that, for me at least, taking part in a range of Neo-Pagan Trads, activities, experiments, discoveries, and spiritual connections has been an effort to overcome that profound disjunction of Western historical culture that you describe.
I have no reason to doubt that we still possess, even when we scarcely use, perceptions of planetary vitality and other-than-human sources of wisdom and understanding. A current of theurgy within today’s Neo-Paganism acknowledges and nurtures that constellation of perceptions and skills built around them.
Let me add an example of felt continuities with our European past that were long doubted denied by dominant (intellectual) culture, but that have been confirmed by recent genetic research. Jean Auel, in her Earth’s Children series, held that modern humans mated with Neanderthals and produced offspring. In the face of lots of insistence and arguments to the contrary.
Recent genetic studies indicate that Europeans do carry a small percentage of genetic material originating in Homo neanderthalis.
Could it be, I wonder, that this little legacy provides certain senses or qualities of connection with the living planet and spiritual beings? Could premises and promises of theurgy in today’s Neo-Paganism draw some influence from such a legacy?
posted September 28, 2010 at 4:08 pm
Is there any evidence that Homo sapiens neanderthalensis was any more ‘spiritual’ than Homo sapiens sapiens?
posted September 28, 2010 at 7:55 pm
Hi All,
WOW! That is alot of information to go through. My 2 favorite subjects to study (Ancient History, and Religious Studies) all wrapped up in 1 beautifully written summery. I enjoyed reading this blog and all of the links. I willingly admit it took quite some time to get through it all, due to the fact that my attention span is a bit decreased lately, but it was well worth it, and quite rewarding reading.
What caught my attention from this blog was: the corellation between ancient paganism, judaism, christianity, and neoplatoism. I love that mythology of judaism and christianity admit that magick (in some form is involved “knowingly or unknowingly”) in their history. I also found it interresting that their own mythology suggests that Hermes may have been a consultant of Moses and/or Noah.
Blessings.raoeste
posted September 29, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Nice overview of a very difficult topic. I look forward to the next part!
In addition to Harran, Hermeticism/Theurgy also found a home right under the noses of the Christian Emperors in Constantinople. Michael Psellos (c.1017-c.1080) revived/resuscitated the Platonism of Iamblichus and Proclus (including their writings on the Chaldean Oracles). Psellos’ true religious identity is open to question, but to the extent that he was “Christian” his was a Christianity heavily indebted to classical Paganism — and viewed with great suspicion by many in the Church.
Psellos’ student (and successor as “Consul of the Philosophers”), John Italos, was put on trial in 1082 and convicted on multiple counts of “Hellenizing”, ie, of being a Pagan apostate. He saved his neck by recanting, and his recantation was even incorporated into the liturgy of the Orthodox Church.
Both Psellos and Italos were extremely popular as teachers, and the Platonic school they founded continued into the 15th century. The last “scholarch” of the school was George Gemistos Plethon, who can positively be identified as a Pagan based on the secret writings discovered after his death.
posted September 29, 2010 at 5:28 pm
I do wish there was some way to convince people to stop using the term “Neoplatonist”. None of those who are referred to by that name ever used it themselves, nor did anyone at the time call them anything other than “Platonists” pure and simple. And familiarity with Plato’s writings reveals that all of the “new” stuff found from Plotinus onwards is based solidly on Plato, and is, therefore, Platonic.
The term “Neoplatonism” was coined specifically with the intention of claiming that Plotinus, etc, were not really Platonists, but were in fact naive and deluded in their belief that their ideas were consistent with the teachings of Plato. Only people who actually agree with that view should use that term, in my opinion. Anyone who genuinely admires the spiritual insights and deep wisdom of the late-antique Platonists should not insult them by applying that pejorative term to them.
posted October 19, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Hi Gus,
I missed your blog when you first wrote it and just stumbled across it. Thank you so much for writing your detailed review. Theurgicon was a wonderful event and I feel privileged to have been a part of it.
Now, on to your question about the influence of Hermetic philosophy on Christianity. My primary reference for this section of my talk was “The Secret Lore of Egypt: Its Impact on the West” by Professor Erik Hornung [Cornell University Press, 1999] pages 53 & 78. I also made use of a popular introduction to Hermeticism called “The Hermetica: The Lost Wisdom of the Pharaohs” by Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy [Piatkus, 1997] pages 19-21.
Hermes Trismegistus was seen as a man and not a god, and so Christian writers were able to incorporate his doctrines.
Lactanius in the third century saw him as a wise pagan who heralded Christ.
Tertullian saw him as the “teacher of all students of nature.”
St Augustine of Hippo in “Retractions” [fourth century] stated:
“That which is called the Christian religion existed among the ancients, and never did not exist, from the beginning of the human race until Christ came in the flesh, at which time the true religion which already existed began to be called Christianity.”
In “City of God,” St Augustine devoted several chapters to Hermes Trismegistus.
Regards,
Tony
posted October 20, 2010 at 12:25 am
Thanks Tony! I appreciate the cites.
I look forward to seeing you at Pantheacon 2011 or the next Theurgicon.
bb
Gus
posted October 20, 2010 at 2:07 am
Hi Gus,
If the gods are willing it’ll be both!
Blessings,
Tony