Democratic Forest Trusts (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.Democratic trusts with leadership elected by citizen-members promise to solve many of the problems afflicting both traditional government and corporate ownership of forestlands. This article explores these issues in some depth.Complexity and the Dream of Human Control of Eco-Systems (PDF)in Watson, Alan; Dean, Liese; Sproull, Janet, comps. 2006. Science and stewardship to protect and sustain wilderness values: Eighth World Wilderness Congress Symposium; 2005 September 30-October 6; Anchorage, AK.The title captures it. I then explore the kinds of institutions compatible with both nature and the modern world that are implied from this analysis.Rethinking the Obvious: Modernity and Living Respectfully With Nature (PDF)The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, Winter, 1997.Modernity is usually considered a wrong turn in terms of respect for and sustaining the environment. I argue the reality is more complex, for modernity has freed us from personal dependence on agriculture, ended the economic value of children, radically reduced the likelihood of large scale wat, and shifted much production to intellectual rather than material capital. This partially decouples society from nature, which gives us important opportunities as well as problems.Towards an Ecocentric Political Economy (PDF)The Trumpeter, Fall, 1996.This paper begins my effort at showing how liberal modernity can be harmonized with an ecocentric perspective on our relationship with the natural world. It is a corrective to much “free market environmental” literature that sacrifices Nature to money as well as to anti-liberal attacks by well-meaning but economically naïve environmentalists.Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organization in Liberal Modernity and Ecology (PDF)The Trumpeter, Journal of Ecosophy, 10:1, Winter 1993This is my initial paper exploring how what I term ‘evolutionary liberal’ thought can be an important means by which society and nature can be brought into greater harmony. The other Trumpeter papers build on it.Deep Ecology and Liberalism: The Greener Implications of Evolutionary Liberalism (PDF)Review of Politics, Fall, 1996.Liberal thought and deep ecology are usually regarded as mutually exclusive. But the “evolutionary” tradition offers a way to integrate the two through commonalties in the work of David Hume, Michael Polanyi, Arne Naess, and Aldo Leopold, providing a stronger foundation for liberalism while strengthening the case for an ecocentric ethic.(Related subjects: Ecology)Saving Western Towns: A Jeffersonian Green Proposal (PDF)in Writers on the Range, Karl Hess and John Baden, eds., University Press of Colorado, 1998.Developmental pressures in the rural and small town West involve three groups: long term residents, new arrivals, and environmentalists. Today their interests often conflict. This conflict is in part the outcome of institutions which prevent harmonizing competing interests. The concept of developmental trusts, both for rural regions and for small communities offers a means whereby these interests can be harmonized for the benefit of all concerned.(Related subjects: Politics)Social Ecology, Deep Ecology, and Liberalism (PDF)Critical Review, 6: 2-3, 1992.Murray Bookchin is considered a leading radical environmental theorist. However, his analysis is incapable of leading humankind towards a more respectful and sustainable relationship with the natural world. Criticisms of Bookchin from both the deep ecology and evolutionary liberal perspective complement one another, pointing the way towards a better understanding of how modernity relates to the environment.The paper as a whole offers an early discussion of issues that are more clearly addressed in later papers, particularly Deep Ecology and Liberalism (1996) and the three Trumpeter articles in 1997, 1996, and 1993. However, there are other ideas in the article which have not been developed more thoroughly elsewhere.
Ostara, the Spring Equinox, is always beautiful here in Sonoma County, California. This year was threatening to be different because we have had a disturbingly dry winter. The grass was green, but very short. We were having to water parts of our garden, something largely unheard of for this time of year. As we began our Full Moon last week rain was not in the forecast other than maybe a little one day this week. For our Full Moon we did a serious rain ritual. I am sure we were not alone. Everyone around here was worried.
The rains started early in the week and it has rained almost non stop ever since. It was never destructively intense, but steady. Inch after inch after inch fell, and soaked deep into the ground. Today, Saturday, the clouds have cleared for a time, leaving a beautifully flooded Laguna de Santa Rosa and huge puddles all around, all brightly intense in the sunlight. The plants are celebrating. It will probably still end up being a dry year, but it will not be disastrously so. Spring will be its usual lush and abundant green.
Our local season and Ostara’s symbolism have moved into perfect harmony.
Wiccan Sabbats celebrate our Wheel of the Year, and like the phases of the moon, the Wheel of the Year symbolize to us the stages of life, from birth to death to rebirth. All things are born, grow, die, and then return to wherever it was that they came. Four Sabbats are “Greater Sabbats” originally linked with Celtic agricultural cycles: Brigit, Beltane, Lammas, and Samhain.
The other four “cross quarter” Sabbats are correlated with the solstices and equinoxes. Over the next few days we Witches and many other Pagans will celebrate Ostara, the Spring Equinox.
Equinoxes are times of balance between day and night, light and darkness. But the balance is dynamic, lasting a day, before shifting into playing a role in that greater balance that is the Wheel of the Year. For me this sense of balance should be the dominant theme of either Ostara, or Mabon, the Fall Equinox. But otherwise they are very different Sabbats, for after Ostara the light will continue to grow, whereas after Mabon, it is darkness that increases.
My altar will be bedecked with bright yellow daffodils and the blue of rosemary. Tomorrow, if I have my act together and it isn’t raining I’ll hike out to the Laguna for sunrise. (It might rain for many more days according to the weather and I’ll happily give up sunrise for that.)
I have been too engrossed in doing much more than this because I have been working to meet a deadline for a big writing opportunity. A little pamphlet a few of us created for the Praxis Peace Institute to respond to the libertarian subtext in the movie Thrive led to a publisher asking for a more complete criticism of libertarian politics. My share of our project needs to be done tomorrow. In a way that is another transition point as well and fits this time.
I’m a political scientist by training, and for thirty years I have been gradually working my way out of a strongly libertarian position while preserving its important insights. All this time I have been striving to share my work with others of that persuasion. Mostly this has been frustrating because so many libertarian scholars were more interested in promoting an ideology than thinking about addressing its weak points or about how to ground it better in speaking to human needs. But I am persistent to a fault.
Finally, at the end of last month my connections with the libertarian establishment came to an end due to some less than honorable actions on their part. I will not go into details because they are irrelevant in this context. But it meant there was no longer much point in trying to address their scholarly side because it had become, for most, nonexistent except as an adjunct to their political agenda.
About the same time I was asked to write a long critique addressed to a non-libertarian mostly progressive audience! I would be making the same arguments and offering the same insights as before, but presented not “in house” to ultimately hostile audience uninterested in ideas except as weapons, but rather outside, to bolster criticisms and deepen understanding. From the vantage of Ostara’s symbolism, the appropriateness of this shift is striking. I am working with the same ideas (balance) but have shifted from one audience to another (from non-receptive to receptive).
That the chapter will be done tomorrow, on the equinox, seems very fitting.



posted March 18, 2012 at 12:01 pm
Often? Usually? almost always? those who hold a strong attachment to an ideology forget or ignore the difference between “sometimes” and “always.” An ideology that proposes that libertarian approaches are sometimes useful is very different from one that insists (with zeal) that libertarian approaches are always to be implemented and lived. And that no other approaches are possible.
Now and then I suspect that most ideologues would rather grass did not grow than that it be watered from an ideologically “wrong” source. OMG! Pink clouds are Commies! Don’t drink that “red” water!
(Let me add that often biographical details about ideologues indicate that they themselves pay no attention to the sourcing of what fuels their private zeals. A recent SF Weekly story about MK-Ultra in SF mentions that the person in charge used a lot of alchohol for himself as he secretly dosed subjects with LSD. So who’s more deranged and deranging?)
posted March 19, 2012 at 12:12 pm
A lot of truth in what you write, Pitch. When I was teaching I told my students that theories and ideologies are like road maps. Follow them so long as they appear accurate, but when you come to a muddy field and the map says there is a fine highway, only idiots drive into the field because the map says to. The rest of us question the map and search for a better one.
posted March 20, 2012 at 6:35 pm
Where do i check in to hookup with other nature lovers for Springtime mysticism and frolicing in the woods? Responde-vous, s’il vous pla^it (hit me up)greymajickjedi@gmail.com