There are two articles in the latest Newsweek magazine that have inspired posts, so you'll get one tomorrow about the end of the happiness craze. Today, though, I am excited about Jonathan Alter's article about the battle between the Early Boomers versus the Late Boomers in the battle between Obama and Clinton.Jill has been bemoaning just such a battle on her blog, where cohorts from both generation are duking it out over the Democratic candidates. The fact is, the Boomers that get the bad rap about being an admittedly self-indulgent and narcissistic generation are those of us born with Pluto in Leo. The late Boomers, the one Alter describes as "feeling like generational stepchildren . . . as if we arrived late at the '60s party after everything turned bitter."
These Boomers are those born with Pluto in Virgo (after October of 1956), and their generation has been marked by a strong resentment to those who came directly before them. This is no surprise, because Virgo doesn't like Leo much. Where Leo seeks the spotlight and takes center stage, demanding attention and adoration, Virgo is selfless and service-oriented and seeks only to serve others and live a life that is safe and orderly. The sign that Pluto falls in typically doesn't express our individual personality but it does reflect who we are as a generation.
The Leo nature doesn't have much thought for the future - it is anchored in the present and a need for pleasure and fun. Virgo, on the other hand, has a tendency to worry about the adequacy of available funds and planning for the future. Where Virgo is willing to work long hours toward a goal, Leo is more concerned with doing work that will allow the fullest expression of oneself. Where Leo seeks to express the Ego in the most perfect way, Virgo has an intense dislike of Ego expression, and herein lies the deepest difficulty between the two generations.
There are plenty of Boomers who weren't hippies, but that instinct for self-expression and living our own life has been a driving force for nearly everyone born during this time period (except for those with strong concentrations of earth and water signs). And it's no wonder that the Pluto in Virgo generation is resentful of the"entitlement and excess" and the squandering of resources that has been done under the Boomer reign.
The length of a generation shortened significantly during this period. Pluto was in Cancer, for example, nearly 25 years (between 1913 and 1939). Those with Pluto in Cancer sacrificed everything for family and country, both focuses of the Cancer archetype. Pluto was in Leo from 1939 until 1956, only 17 years, and then in Virgo for only 15 years, from 1956 until 1971. Jonathan Alter reports that demographers have concluded that generations are only 10-15 years rather than the 20 years used previously, and this makes sense given the acceleration of Pluto during these years and Pluto was in Sagittarius for only 13 years. (This trend is about to reverse, with Pluto traveling through Capricorn for 16 years. )
Obama's candidacy is reaching across aisles of race and gender; hopefully he can reach across the Pluto/Virgo aisle as well!

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I'm not going to claim I'm intimately familiar w/ both candidates records - because I don't. But reading the position papers on Hillary's website I find some of the common characterizations to be misleading. Like the claim that only Obama is for efficiency & lower cost in healthcare. Or only he is for negotiation w/ hostile nations. On these two particular issues Hillary's position papers also mention these tactics as part of a larger strategy.
As for Obama being more unifying, I don't know. Maybe he can convince centrist Republicans. But I'm not so sure about the GOP & other hardcore Republican camps. We just have to accept that on some issues people fundamentally disagree. The same will hold true for foreign states - eg hardcore Islamic states. You can talk, but when it comes to passing laws, different people want different laws. And many not only want themselves to behave a certain way, but also want everyone else to be the same - ie they don't tolerate differences. I don't see how Obama will be able to resolve that difference.
When you talk about unity in the abstract it's very inspiring. But the devil is in the details.
If Obama truly believe in the liberal policies that he has put forth so far, I don't see how he'll be able to unite both Democrats & Republicans. And I have no doubts the GOPs will go after him as hard as they have after Clinton. I guess he has more leaway so far as he is lesser know, & perhaps the GOPs are not as strong as they once were.
The will to unite has to come from the people. Leaders can only go so far. I think leaders get too much credits for the hard work of the people. And people rely too much on "leaders" to solve problems. The Buddha is w/in you.
BTW I don't know the reference to Tracy Flick - haven't seen that movie. But the clip doesn't exactly convince me otherwise. Yes, what about people who worked hard - do they not deserve success? That doesn't seem fair to me. It would seem to discourage hard work - ie no matter how hard you try, if you're unlucky to be born w/o charisma then you can forget about success. Is that the message Obama want to convey? I hope not.
I must admit, it's a bit intimidating writing as a Hilary supporter in such a pro-Obama forum
It's looking as though it's all over bar the shouting after tonight.
Only some unexpected event can stop the roll of success for Obama.
I'm disappointed, I've been disappointed three times now - Kucinich, Edwards and Clinton - yes, a mixed selection, each with diminishing enthusiasm on my part.
What we Kucinich/Edwards/Clinton supporters have to keep in mind is that Obama is quite likely to win the general election, if his army of fans remain as enthusiastic as they are now. I'd feel happier if they were less vitriolic and more respectful of the other candidate, who will still be (at least) a senator after this is over. At times in forums on-line it's been more like a schoolyard with taunts and bullying.
Anyway, it seems that the people of the USA HAVE woken up at last, which is what I've been whingeing about since I got here from the UK in 2004.
I just hope, having woken up , that they didn't rollout of bed and put their feet in the wrong slippers.
As long as we end up with a Democrat for president, that's really all that matters
Twilight, interestingly I'm a New Yorker now living in the UK. Is it the experience with Blair's New Labour that has turn us a bit skeptical of popular movements you think?
Could well be, lola!
It'll be very interesting to watch how things turn out
I am a Pluto in Cancer (9/16/37). I have nothing in common with that generation as it is described. I absolutely cannot agree with anyone like McCain or anyone of that generation and would not vote for anyone like him. I am so like Pluto in Leo and also Pluto in Virgo. I am perplexed because of this, but happy because I love both the Clintons and the Obamas. I would have been happy to vote for Obama and Clinton as I am to vote for Obama and Biden. I guess I have found my "own expression" and cultivated the best of the latter generations.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.