Benedictions: The Pope in America

Benedictions: The Pope in America

Apologia pro Blog Sua–an Introduction

posted by David Gibson | 3:33pm Thursday March 27, 2008

Actually, that may be “suo.” Is “blog” masculine? I trust this blog is. Perhaps Reggie Foster, the pope’s inimitable Latinist, can help out here. I don’t have enough Latin to know. And it’s not because I am a convert to Catholicism. As a post-Vatican II Catholic, I probably wouldn’t have learned enough Latin to know anyway. But I did live and work in Rome for five years, much of it for and around the Vatican, a hegira that ended with my conversion—a miracle in itself, many would say.
Hence the title of this introductory “Benedictions” post, referring to the defense of his own conversion penned by the nineteenth-century Englishman, John Henry Newman. I doubt I’ll be made a cardinal, though Newman’s own elevation may not have been a sure thing in today’s rough-and-tumble church. Newman himself was as orthodox as the Pope, but could also critique the Vatican and the Church for misuses of authority, and power. That, too, is a model I’d like to emulate.
So what can you expect on this blog?


I’d like it to be “catholic,” as in universal, finding both profundity and whimsy—even absurdity—that inevitably accompanies the traveling circus that is a papal visit. (See some of my thoughts on popes in the U.S. in this National Catholic Reporter essay.) I’d like to bring my nearly 25 years experience covering the popes and the church to bear—but I also hope to be challenged, contradicted, even corrected, when I, sad to say, prove to be fallible. The end result is that we are all better informed through the conversation.
A pope’s appearances and talks are inevitably loaded with meanings inside of meanings, like a set of Russian nesting dolls, but no pope packs in as many layers as Joseph Ratzinger, now Benedict XVI. Theology, philosophy, piety, politics and, of course, the pope’s personality, are all aspects of his papacy, and all will be on display for the next few weeks, and afterwards. For a starting point, check out my handy guide of six things you absolutely have to know about Benedict.
If you want to know more—and I hope you do—I’d of course steer you toward my biography of the pope, titled (not terribly original), “The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World.” It’s the only biography (to date) of Benedict as pope, rather than Joseph Ratzinger as a cardinal, and I hope it brings a 360-degree perspective on the man whose papacy is having such an impact on the church—even though most Catholics aren’t quite sure how. Also remember that Joseph Ratzinger himself is a prolific writer, and his own memoir, “Milestones,” is a fine small volume to begin to get a sense of the man from the man himself.
But just as it is important for us to understand Benedict XVI—and he will be the focus over the next few weeks—it is also important for Benedict and the rest of the church to understand the lives of American Catholics in the pews, of priests in the pulpits, and the vowed religious serving everywhere. The challenges facing the American church, especially in the past few years of scandal and turmoil, are truly daunting, and yet they actually highlight the profound fidelity and enthusiasm that American Catholics have for the church, even as they struggle with the institution and the doctrines and traditions.
I hope this blog is a two-way lens that helps explain the pope to American Catholics, and represents the voices and concerns of American Catholics. I’ll be looking forward to hearing your thoughts, and having some fun along the way.



Previous Posts

Archbishop Chaput weighs in against "Obama Catholics"--and for...?
Denver's Archbishop Charles Chaput combines an intellectual's depth with the doughty persona of a politicker, which is what he used to be--he worked for the RFK campaign and later, even as a priest, was a campaign volunteer for Jimmy Carter. Some say he's still a political operative, though for the

posted 11:18:53am May. 20, 2008 | read full post »

The Hagee-Donohue ticket: "Liberals' worst nightmare"
The elaborate courtship of Texas televangelist John Hagee--who is covering McCain's evangelical flank--and the Catholic League's Bill Donohue, who accused Hagee of anti-Catholicism for his "Great Whore" sermonizing and other standard anti-papist barbs, always seemed to hold about as much suspense as

posted 10:54:05am May. 19, 2008 | read full post »

An olive branch to divorced-and-remarried Catholics?
An item in the current edition of The Tablet of London hints at a possible opening for divorced and remarried Catholics to receive communion--even though many do, obviously, their ban from the altar under church law remains one of the sorest pastoral points in the US church. It is also a sore point

posted 6:00:00am May. 17, 2008 | read full post »

The key to Benedict...
It is summed up in a response recounted by Father Jim Martin, a Jesuit and author who posts (and edits) at America magazine's blog. Father Martin has a post on "Three Unreported Papal Stories" from last month's visit. The third is the payoff: Third: Another priest friend serving as a secretary to on

posted 5:12:35pm May. 16, 2008 | read full post »

Guerilla tactics and the "Communion Wars"...Doug Kmiec is denied communion for backing Obama
It seems that the former Reagan adviser and Catholic conservative legal scholar from Pepperdine, Doug Kmiec--heretofore a man with impeccable judicial and pro-life credentials--has been barred from communion for his support for Barack Obama. In a posting yesterday, Kmiec did not give details, but wr

posted 12:37:21pm May. 16, 2008 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
Douglas Hopfer PhD

posted March 30, 2008 at 8:13 am


Actually, that may be “suo.” Is “blog” masculine? No blog would be neuter and “suum”
F. Douglas Hopfer PhD



report abuse
 

David G.

posted March 30, 2008 at 11:28 am


Thanks Douglas Hopfer. I am trying to track down the Vatican’s relatively new lexicon of Latin neologisms. I’m pretty sure “blog” is in there, in some for. I’ll keep you posted.



report abuse
 

Robert Blair Kaiser

posted March 30, 2008 at 2:36 pm


I wonder, David, if you’d care to explain why it is that American Catholics go crazy every time the pope comes to America? What does this pope-worship say about us? Robert Blair Kaiser



report abuse
 

Jim Keane, SJ

posted March 30, 2008 at 8:23 pm


David,
Among the many Latin translations for “blog,” I suspect the most accurate is “ephemeris,” meaning “a diary, usually written without great reflection,” which is a feminine noun, so “sua” would be fine, though in truth it’s your blog, so “mea” would be best. Keeping in mind that in Latin the adjective describes the noun, not the subject or speaker, so your masculinity remains intact.
Jim Keane,sj



report abuse
 

Mr.HERB SHANAFELT

posted March 31, 2008 at 1:24 pm


Monday,March 30th,2008
The Good Brother (an S.J.) is correct in His surmisal,of “ephemeris’
is closer to the the inference of the Modern Term,’blog’. (I also agree
w/ ‘mea’ ). GOOD Posting father JIM!



report abuse
 

Jude the verbose

posted April 1, 2008 at 9:47 am


In response to Robert Blair Kaiser: I would be reluctant to use the term “worship”, since it is the basis of so much misunderstanding by non-Catholic Christians who consider all prayer as worship. Americans idolize stars in most every area. And the largest per centage of American Catholics will not get to see our Holy Father in person. Since we must share him with Catholics all around the world, we are especially pleased that he has chosen to visit our country.



report abuse
 

Ellen

posted April 1, 2008 at 11:27 am


In response to your article about Pope Benedict XVI, and 6 handy things to know about him. You concluded with the latin mass is obsolete. I object! It is alive and well and growing a stronger following every day. It is a struggle to get the word out when folks insist it is gone and unavailable. I am truly dissappointed that as a servicemember I am now blocked from attendance by the Archdiocese of the Military who are so progressive they do not care to meet the needs of traditionalists. God Bless them everyone, hurts my heart to be told my spiritual needs are unimportant, especially in this governmental environment that is so anti- religion, and more so every day it seems. Not, mind you by way of laws or regulations, but simply in the name of tolerance and by popular (if uniformed) opinion….”separation of Church and State”.
Thank you for your article. Welcome to the Church. Truth is not relative. he is a good Pope, we are blessed to have him. let us put souls first in all things.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.