Benedictions: The Pope in America

Benedictions: The Pope in America

Daily Pope Question No. 7

posted by David Gibson | 8:44pm Tuesday April 22, 2008

Q: Did a pope really condemn Galileo for saying the Earth revolves around the Sun?
Read more from the papal answer man, Chris Bellitto and his new book, 101 Questions on Popes and the Papacy.


A: The answer is yes—kind of.
Bellitto%20Book%20Cover.jpgThe thing to remember is that the issue was less about astronomy and science than authority. The pope in question was a complex man, Urban VIII (1623-1644): a very well-educated aristocrat, humanist, diplomat, patron of artists and architects (including Gianlorenzo Bernini, 1598-1680), and generous supporter of missions and evangelization, but also a pope guilty of nepotism, greed, absolutist tendencies, and poor political decisions. Some scholars think of him as the last Renaissance pope in the best and worst senses. Like some of his predecessors, Urban VIII was fascinated by astronomy and supported scientists in their work, including his friend Galileo (1564-1642), whom he had praised in print and defended from condemnation while still a cardinal.
As long as Galileo asserted that the idea of the Earth revolving around the Sun was an experiment or hypothesis, he was left alone. He had been warned to do so by none other than the papal defender, the Jesuit Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621). With the election of his friend as Pope Urban VIII, Galileo felt comfortable in going further to state as scientific fact the Copernican or heliocentric model of the sun as the center of the solar system. When Galileo did so, he ran into trouble since it conflicted with the church notion of the Earth as the center of the universe.
We must remember that the ultimate interpreter of the Bible was the pope and he would not give up this authority, especially only a century after the Protestants had said everyone could read and interpret the Bible for themselves. Galileo must have been surprised (if not shocked and even betrayed) to find that his former defender, now Urban VIII, had moved the conversation from astronomy, mathematics, and science to theology, authority, and obedience. In 1633, Galileo was faced with condemnation and chose to take back his scientific statements; he spent the rest of his life under house arrest and was unable to teach or write publicly.
To jump a few centuries ahead: the rehabilitation of Galileo was one of the earliest tasks John Paul II explored, starting just a year after his election. The pontifical commission he ordered to reopen the case concluded in 1992 that Galileo’s critics had misunderstood scripture and had mistakenly taken it as not only fact, but religious doctrine, that the Earth must be the center of the universe. As a result, John Paul II declared the church had made a mistake in condemning Galileo.



Previous Posts

Archbishop Chaput weighs in against "Obama Catholics"--and for...?
Denver's Archbishop Charles Chaput combines an intellectual's depth with the doughty persona of a politicker, which is what he used to be--he worked for the RFK campaign and later, even as a priest, was a campaign volunteer for Jimmy Carter. Some say he's still a political operative, though for the

posted 11:18:53am May. 20, 2008 | read full post »

The Hagee-Donohue ticket: "Liberals' worst nightmare"
The elaborate courtship of Texas televangelist John Hagee--who is covering McCain's evangelical flank--and the Catholic League's Bill Donohue, who accused Hagee of anti-Catholicism for his "Great Whore" sermonizing and other standard anti-papist barbs, always seemed to hold about as much suspense as

posted 10:54:05am May. 19, 2008 | read full post »

An olive branch to divorced-and-remarried Catholics?
An item in the current edition of The Tablet of London hints at a possible opening for divorced and remarried Catholics to receive communion--even though many do, obviously, their ban from the altar under church law remains one of the sorest pastoral points in the US church. It is also a sore point

posted 6:00:00am May. 17, 2008 | read full post »

The key to Benedict...
It is summed up in a response recounted by Father Jim Martin, a Jesuit and author who posts (and edits) at America magazine's blog. Father Martin has a post on "Three Unreported Papal Stories" from last month's visit. The third is the payoff: Third: Another priest friend serving as a secretary to on

posted 5:12:35pm May. 16, 2008 | read full post »

Guerilla tactics and the "Communion Wars"...Doug Kmiec is denied communion for backing Obama
It seems that the former Reagan adviser and Catholic conservative legal scholar from Pepperdine, Doug Kmiec--heretofore a man with impeccable judicial and pro-life credentials--has been barred from communion for his support for Barack Obama. In a posting yesterday, Kmiec did not give details, but wr

posted 12:37:21pm May. 16, 2008 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
StHilarious

posted April 24, 2008 at 2:42 am


John Paul II declared the church had made a mistake in condemning Galileo and so admitted that the popes are not infallible and the church has changed its mind on issues.
I am waiting for a courageous pope to say that RCism was wrong about Mary.



report abuse
 

Rose Maria

posted April 24, 2008 at 2:59 pm


There seems to be grave misconception of what the Church claims by its doctrine of infallibility. The church’s claim to infallibility applies solely to faith and morals, not to scientific concepts, and hence not to the solar system.
I suggest and pray that you be open enough to turn to Mary and ask her to help you understand her relationship with respect to Christ and the Church. Ask her that if she is real to show you how this is possible and the light to see the TRUTH!



report abuse
 

Shelle1234

posted April 24, 2008 at 3:27 pm


In my opinion astronomy has nothing to do with your faith in God. I do not believe Galileo should have been condemned for making a mere observation seeing as everyone’s observations are not the same. As long as you have faith in the lord it wont matter what you believe to be truth or not in astronomy or anything else for that matter. Im not really sure on the whole story and what really happened, but i am very glad to know that John Paul II may have admitted to making a mistake. I think that shows integrety and maturity also to admit that he was wrong.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.

Share this story


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Help

Media Kit

Subscribe

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.