Benedictions: The Pope in America

Jeremiah, Obama, and Catholics

Monday April 28, 2008

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright is back in the news, delivering some fiery (the indispensible adjective with the Rev. Wright) rhetoric yesterday at the close of a meeting of the NAACP's Detroit branch. Wright's unrepentant talk and prophetic style are likely to make you smile if you are a black Christian or Hillary Clinton, and if they make you wince then you may well be Barack Obama or...Roman Catholic.

Yes, many have traced Obama's difficulties in attracting blue-collar Catholic "Reagan Democrats" to his lack of working-class elan (that silver-spoon-fed Hillary can out-maneuver a community organizer from urban Chicago is a tribute to her political machine) or, more disturbingly, his race. The Pew Forum's resident politics-and-religion mandarin, John Green, explores Obama's uphill battle with white Catholics in this Q&A, noting that Obama lost the Catholic vote by more than 2-1 on Pennsylvania, and Indiana next week could be more of the same.

A couple points to make: One is that Obama is having trouble attracting all regular church-goers, which is odd given that he is the only regular church-goer among the three remaining candidates, a man who remains loyal to his congregation (where Wright was pastor until recently) and his denomination, the largely white UCC. But Green also turns the question around, asking whether Clinton has an "African-American problem" or an "unaffiliated problem"--two groups she'll need to win the nomination, and the general election.

In that vein I would also ask whether the Catholic Church has an "African-American problem." In other words, is part of the problem for Catholic voters that the Catholic Church is on the white side of the racial-religious divide--which Wright noted last night, an indisputable point--that marks American Christianity? There are just 2.5 million black Catholics out of more than 65 million American Catholics, and many of those are Caribbean or African immigrants with little in common with the Southern, Protestant, and slave-era heritage African-Americans of Wright's congregation. Indeed, one reason there are so few black Catholics is that the American hierarchy, fearing a schism like those that afflicted other churches during the Civil War, did not speak out with one voice against slavery.

Black Catholics are a remarkable community, and one that could and should inspire the rest of the American church. Yet they are often overlooked in the focus on our enormous Latino growth, and they are often alienated by the shift back toward a more strait-laced, Old World liturgy. It is a shame that Pope Benedict could not have attended a black Catholic liturgy during his visit--now that is the holy rolling Spirit. Among other things, Hurricane Katrina also inflicted a devastating wound on the black Catholic community concentrated in New Orleans, an issue I explored, along with the history of black Catholics in the U.S., in this 2006 Wall Street Journal column.

In short, American Catholics find black Christian rhetoric completely "foreign" for all sorts of cultural and demographic reasons. They never hear this kind of preaching, and one wonders whether they should listen more closely; they might hear some familiar notes. Such as the insistence on communal spirituality and solidarity, one of the principal themes of Benedict's own homilies this month. Or the focus on social justice--a tradition and teaching that has been so crucial to lifting up our own Catholic forebears. Or the powerful laments--jeremiads one might say--that characterize the preaching of our own Catholic leadership, albeit it in a different key.

For a good context, read Father John Kavanaugh's insightful (and powerful) column on the two Jeremiahs (biblical and contemporary) in the April 14 edition of America:

The problem with much preaching in Christian churches is that we apply the prophetic indignation easily to our enemies, but rarely to ourselves, our church, our nation. But if we think Jeremiah and Jesus are not addressing us, we have nothing to learn from either—at our peril. Was the Reverend Wright speaking in this tradition when he gave his infamous talk after the evils of 9/11? I think so. His sermon was a commentary on revenge and the violence that returns to those who do violence, especially against the innocent. Wright recounted our national history of killing children, from the Sioux to the Japanese. All just causes, one might sincerely think. But all horrific. And this is where the preacher talked about the “chickens coming home to roost.” As Wright continued, he pointed out that violence and hatred beget violence and hatred. And then the preacher turned to something that possibly no one is aware of from the YouTube clips. Having been in New Jersey on that September day of “unthinkable acts,” Jeremiah Wright was drawn to examine his own relationship to God, his lack of prayer, his honesty. “Is it real or is it fake? Is it forever or is it for show?”

One needn't agree with Wright, or like him, or his words, or his tone. But every Catholic could ask themselves why it is that so few African-Americans find a lasting spiritual home in our church. Pope Benedict urged the American bishops to continue the church's educational mission to urban areas, where Catholic schools have been a lifeline to many black children. Yet those schools, like all Catholic schools, labor under severe financial strains. Even so, many African-Americans graduate from Catholic schools, and appreciate their education. But they don't become Catholic. Why?

None of these questions will be answered in time to help Barack Obama, I suspect. But perhaps if he is the nominee, and if he wins the general election, Obama could build a bridge to the Catholic community based on the principles they already share. And perhaps Catholics could walk across it.

Two final suggestions for those who want to explore the issue more deeply: Check out this post (and subsequent vigorous discussion) at dotCommonweal by Cathleen Kaveny, a professor of law and theology at Notre Dame, and a member of Obama's National Catholic Advisory Council. Also check out this Bill Moyers interview with Wright, the pastor's first since the brouhaha erupted.

Advertisement
Comments
dragnet
April 30, 2008 3:58 PM

Okay: why 90%+? Why is that your cutoff line?? Why not 55%? Or 75%? Are you saying that if only 80% of black voters supported Obama then it wouldn't be race-based voting? Obama only got 80% of the black vote in South Carolina. So does this mean that black voters in that state weren't voting based on race?? He got far less than that in New York--so what about black voters in this state, Jennifer--racist or not?? Or would you perhaps lower that 90% threshold just to lump all us black people in together to fit your erroneous claim?? Al Sharpton and Carol Moseley-Braun also ran for president and are very well known and respected in our community---how many black votes did they get?? I'm sorry that the facts don't fit in with what you espouse.

Clinton has been getting over 60% of the white woman vote in some states--and even more among women far advanced in age. But rather than assume that they are supporting her for racist/sexist reason, I instead decided to consider more relevant issues--like her obvious rapport with them and experience dealing with the issues they find most pressing. Or is 60% too low a cutoff number? How convenient...

Obama has also collected the overwhelming majority of the under-30 vote. Any chance that's due to their systematic discrimination against older candidates?

The problem with your argument and arguments like this is that there are simpler, less asinine and more likely explanations than the one you are offering. I am sure there are a few blacks voting for Obama because he is (half) black. But for the overwhelmingly majority of us--maybe even 90% perhaps--that's not even close to the only reason why and your attempt pigeonhole us all as race-based voters is ignorant and disgusting. What you are doing is trying to obscure the reality of this situation by attributing the modes and biases of the dominant group to the oppressed. It's an old trick and you've been called on it so deal.

JL
April 30, 2008 4:30 PM

Jennifer,

The main reason 90% of blacks are not voting for Hillary Clinton is that she said Martin Luther King made speeches, while it took Lyndon Johnson to pass the Civil Rights bill, after denigrating speeches for two weeks. Substitute the Pope for Martin Luther King and you would see a large %age of catholics not voting for Hillary Clinton, a white person. Would you then be calling those catholics religious bigots?

The fact is you only look at his contest through the prism of race. There are many larger themes going on in this primary. Hope vs Fear. Optimism vs. Pessimism. Disgust with Washington politics vs. complacency with it. Change vs. Status Quo. Community vs. Cronyism. I can tell you for good reasons - many of them economic - the change candidate will always win among blacks, whether he's black or white. Remember 90% of blacks voted for Bill Clinton.

Jennifer Braun
April 30, 2008 4:37 PM

Dear Dragnet:

Since you know nothing about me, I'm surprised to hear you accuse me of "attributing the modes and biases of the dominant group to the oppressed." I don't understand why you are reluctant to accept the possibility that a large percentage of african-Americans are voting for Obama because of his race, as presumably are a large number of whites voting for Clinton, and in either case it is wrong. On another matter, your continued name calling serves only to hurt your credibility and you might wish to take a course in argumentation if you wish to persuade people in the future.

dragnet
April 30, 2008 4:46 PM

i don't have to know you to know what you are doing. i know what you said--that is enough.

"I don't understand why you are reluctant to accept the possibility that a large percentage of african-Americans are voting for Obama because of his race, as presumably are a large number of whites voting for Clinton, and in either case it is wrong."

That's just it--I DON'T BELIEVE THAT LARGE NUMBERS OF WHITES ARE VOTING FOR CLINTON BECAUSE OBAMA IS BLACK. That's the difference between us---YOU believe that race is the prime mover and the key motivating factor for the electorate. I don't. I simply think regarding the vast majority of people, other explanations are more likely---for black and whites alike. Race is your fixation, not mine..

And you never did answer the other myriad points that I made. This is further evidence that your position is ill-considered and that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

My aim was never to persuade you. It was to educate you and to call you on your bullsh!t.

Mission accomplished.

mrmissy
May 2, 2008 9:53 AM

Is this some kind of official movement now? You've already stated that 2.5 million Blacks are Catholic. Is this some kind of short-coming?

Why aren't more Blacks Catholic? Because they don't want to be, maybe?

Is that so wrong?

Is this a trick question?

Oh, those Blacks. Will they ever measure up to the ideal we Whites have for them?!!!!

Read All Comments


Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Benedictions: The Pope in America

The last update to the Benedictions blog was in April 2008. We welcome your comments about the Pope and Catholicism in general in our http://community.beliefnet.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=140”>Catholic forums.

David Gibson is an award-winning religion writer who specializes in writing about the Catholic Church, which he joined as a convert at the age of 30. He is the author The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. He also wrote The Coming Catholic Church: How the Faithful are Shaping a New American Catholicism. He has written about Catholicism for leading newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Newsweek, The Wall Street Journal, New York magazine, Boston magazine, Fortune, Commonweal, and America. Gibson worked in Rome for Vatican Radio for several years and traveled frequently with Pope John Paul II. He later covered religion for The Star-Ledger of New Jersey. He has co-written several recent documentaries on Christianity for CNN. For further information check out his website at dgibson.com.

David's Books:

book_rule.jpg

buybook.gif
book_coming.jpg

buybook.gif


Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.