|
Previous Posts
Archbishop Chaput weighs in against "Obama Catholics"--and for...?
Denver's Archbishop Charles Chaput combines an intellectual's depth with the doughty persona of a politicker, which is what he used to be--he worked for the RFK campaign and later, even as a priest, was a campaign volunteer for Jimmy Carter. Some say he's still a political operative, though for the
posted 11:18:53am May. 20, 2008 |
read full post
»
The Hagee-Donohue ticket: "Liberals' worst nightmare"
The elaborate courtship of Texas televangelist John Hagee--who is covering McCain's evangelical flank--and the Catholic League's Bill Donohue, who accused Hagee of anti-Catholicism for his "Great Whore" sermonizing and other standard anti-papist barbs, always seemed to hold about as much suspense as
posted 10:54:05am May. 19, 2008 |
read full post
»
An olive branch to divorced-and-remarried Catholics?
An item in the current edition of The Tablet of London hints at a possible opening for divorced and remarried Catholics to receive communion--even though many do, obviously, their ban from the altar under church law remains one of the sorest pastoral points in the US church. It is also a sore point
posted 6:00:00am May. 17, 2008 |
read full post
»
The key to Benedict...
It is summed up in a response recounted by Father Jim Martin, a Jesuit and author who posts (and edits) at America magazine's blog. Father Martin has a post on "Three Unreported Papal Stories" from last month's visit. The third is the payoff:
Third: Another priest friend serving as a secretary to on
posted 5:12:35pm May. 16, 2008 |
read full post
»
Guerilla tactics and the "Communion Wars"...Doug Kmiec is denied communion for backing Obama
It seems that the former Reagan adviser and Catholic conservative legal scholar from Pepperdine, Doug Kmiec--heretofore a man with impeccable judicial and pro-life credentials--has been barred from communion for his support for Barack Obama. In a posting yesterday, Kmiec did not give details, but wr
posted 12:37:21pm May. 16, 2008 |
read full post
»
|
Actually, that phrase should be a contradiction in terms. But it’s up to you to decide if a “Christ Our Hope” 
posted April 9, 2008 at 6:37 pm
hey, I can get a jump start on my Christmas ’08 shopping !!
posted April 11, 2008 at 11:32 am
I am not a catholic
I don’t follow the pope
I follow Jesus
Jesus is my high priest
posted April 11, 2008 at 12:57 pm
how can i visit rome and lorduss,please pray for me and my family.thanks
posted April 11, 2008 at 3:52 pm
I FELLOW JESUS THE POPE IS WONDERFUL PERSON AND PEOPLE SHOULD HONOR HIM
RESCEPT HIM BUT I AM NOT CATHOLIC ANYMORE BUT HE DOES HAVE RIGHTS TO BE RESCEPTED AT LEAST YOU DON’T HAVE TO FELLOW THE POPE PHILLIP .ITS GOOD YOU ARE FELLOWING JESUS CHRIST THAT HOW MEANT TO BE BUT I WAS CATHOLIC FOR 19 YRS AND EVEN CATHOLIC DOESN’T ALWAYS DO IT RIGHT BUT EITHER DOES ALL RELIOGN {HOW SPELLED} EITHER BUT HE DOES NEED TO BE HONOR AND RESCEPTED NOW MATTER WHAT. EVEN WE DON’T ALL AGREE ON THINGS IN GENERAL DOESN’T MEAN THAT PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHTS TO BE RESCEPTED FOR THEIR ABLIES TO DO THE JOB AND TO GET IT DONE. I DOOUBET IF PEOPLE WANT BE IN THE POPE OR THE PRESIDENTS SHOES.
LOVE VICTORIA.
posted April 11, 2008 at 9:58 pm
“Christ our Hope.” and Benedict 16 are opposite values.