Meet others on the journey in
Therese’s community group
Ask Therese to be your friend
- Follow Therese on these partner sites:
- Psych Central
- The Huffington Post
- Intent
- ShareWIK
- PBS/This Emotional Life
- Today’s Mama
Advertisement
Today I have the honor of interviewing Eugene (Gene) and Charles (Church) Zorumski, authors of “Demystifying Psychiatry: A Resource for Patients and Families.” It is a fascinating and comprehensive resource to explain one of the most misunderstood sciences of our time.
Question: In your book, you chart the various trends of psychiatry. In your view what are the most substantial trends and why?
Answer: Thank you for asking us about our thoughts concerning the most substantial trends in psychiatry and about why we are optimistic about the future of psychiatry.
We believe that three of the most substantial trends in psychiatry today are:
A) We believe that the delivery of psychiatric care will increasingly require close collaboration between primary care medical teams and mental health teams. In this model, the psychiatrist would act in a consultative role to the primary healthcare team. The primary care physician (PCP) and staff would learn to recognize and treat patients with less complicated psychiatric illnesses. A non-physician member of the primary care team could be specifically trained to serve in a case manager-type capacity and help coordinate the collaboration between the PCP and the psychiatrist.
In patients with more difficult-to-treat illnesses such as those involving psychosis, active manic symptoms, or refractory depression, the psychiatrist would take a more primary role in care delivery and lead the healthcare team with the help of collaboration from the PCP. The mental health team would utilize the skills of mental health professionals with various backgrounds in addition to the psychiatrist.
The impetus for this model of care is based on several trends discussed in the book. These include the likelihood that there will continue to be a significant shortage in the number of psychiatrists; increased use of evidence-based treatments, some of which can be effectively initiated by the PCP’s team; increased recognition of the impact of psychiatric illnesses on the outcome of concurrent medical conditions (such as heart disease and diabetes) and on the health care economy; and continued decrease in the stigma associated with psychiatric illnesses as parity in insurance coverage is implemented.
Psychiatric disorders are major contributors to disability in western economies and are associated with substantial mortality, particularly when addictive disorders such as alcoholism and nicotine dependence are taken into account. We see psychiatry as playing a key role in helping to diminish these drivers of health care costs.
B) Choice of psychiatric treatment will be increasingly based on data demonstrating that the treatments are effective. Results defining best clinical practices are rapidly accumulating. Psychiatrists are required to participate in continuing medical education, and these activities increasingly emphasize best practices based on clinical research.
It is essential that continuing education of physicians emphasizes unbiased information that is independent of marketing by the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. The trend to eliminate financial conflicts of interest is important.
New treatments will likely emphasize combinations of psychological therapies, life style approaches, cognitive rehabilitative strategies, and biological approaches. The misguided belief that cures can come from a simple pill will be replaced by recognition that better understanding of the full spectrum of brain sciences and the role of environment on brain function is necessary in order to develop more effective treatments.
C) Advances in neuroscience research are exciting and important. We would like to highlight two areas of progress that will have significant influence on psychiatry.
- Knowledge from scientific research is leading to the development of strategies for combining different treatment modalities to treat specific disorders. For instance, we are now beginning to consider how to pair medications that augment learning with various behavioral therapies. Such an approach has implications for the treatment of a variety of anxiety disorders, including phobias, panic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and may find utility in other disorders. There is increasing recognition that learning and cognitive deficits accompany major psychiatric disorders, and these deficits are now becoming targets for therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions.
- Significant progress is being made in understanding how brain systems coordinate activity to generate human thinking, emotions, and motivation, as well as the way such systems malfunction to produce psychiatric disorders. Over the long term, such understanding will allow the development of treatments that target brain mechanisms underlying psychiatric symptoms and disorders. These treatments could potentially stop disorders from advancing or even prevent disorders from developing. Prevention requires the ability to predict who is going to develop an illness before symptoms appear (pre-clinical diagnosis). We would emphasize the tremendous progress being made in pre-clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, and this serves as a model for what may be possible in primary psychiatric disorders. Over the next several decades, we envision similar advances involving anxiety and addictive disorders. Eventually, these approaches should lead to increasingly specific interventions for psychotic disorders, mood disorders, and personality disorders.
Question: You are optimistic about the future of psychiatry. Can you give me a few reasons why?
Answer: Why are we optimistic about psychiatry’s future?
* Click here to subscribe to Beyond Blue and click here to follow Therese on Twitter and click here to join Group Beyond Blue, a depression support group. Now stop clicking.
|
Previous Posts
Therapy Thursday: Sweat
posted 6:01:57am Feb. 09, 2012 | read full post »
Scrupulosity: What It Is and Why It's Dangerous
posted 6:17:35am Feb. 07, 2012 | read full post »
The Treasures of Darkness
posted 6:06:40am Feb. 06, 2012 | read full post »
On Groundhog Day: 12 Winter Depression Busters
posted 6:30:47am Feb. 02, 2012 | read full post »
6 Ways to Stay Resilient in Stress
posted 6:00:24am Jan. 31, 2012 | read full post » |
posted November 20, 2009 at 3:41 am
Designing looks for Gucci’s iconic lines is a full-time job, but Gucci Creative Director Frida Giannini has taken on some side projects, too. After all, 1921 Florence—where Gucci was founded—was a fashionable time, but 2010 is upon us, and Gucci is looking forward for their stylish, savvy clients.
posted November 20, 2009 at 1:32 pm
Psychiatry, “one of the most misunderstood sciences of our time”?
The only thing that has been misunderstood in our time is that psychiatry is not a science.
Science requires a postulate or hypothesis, based on the observation of phenomenon and the the proof of the hypothesis through repeated experiment.
Psychiatry a) does not know the source of the single so-called mental illness and b) does not know the “therapeutic mechanism” of 100% of the most-prescribed psychiatric medications drugs.
Schildkraut’s 1965 chemical imbalance theory (a postulate or hypothesis), which has become the backbone of modern psychiatric method, HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN.
So, where is the science?
Psychiatrist, the poor souls, have been duped by a system of higher education that was co-opted some 70 years ago by business interests (as in pharmaceutical business) and they have been educated in that single mode of therapy: drugs. What they don’t get is that the overwhelming of a person’s nervous system by a psychoactive compound is not the same thing as solving the root of the person’s problem.
the analogy is, if I hit you over the head with a brick, you will forget all about your broken heart, real quick.
Game over, psychiatry.