The full page ad said it all. A Masters of Divinity degree offered now with
only ONE required course in Bible,
ONE in theology, and none in church history over a three year period! And a more economical one as well--- you can
have the degree with only 75 hours of course work! Why labor in the vineyard for 90-96 hours (the length of most
M.Div. degrees), when you can get a more spiritually formed and forming degree
with as many as 21 few credit hours required than the traditional degree? Doubtless the marketing department of this
particular school (which shall remain anonymous) had a say in this. One
can over hear the conversation--- "Let's tap into the current post-modern interest
in spirituality, and attract more degree seekers that way!" The problem with this is, we primarily need
more truth seekers, not just more degree seekers interested in spirituality in our
seminaries.
How should one react to the trumpeted announcement of such a degree by an important Evangelical school? Should we all rise up and call it blessed? I think not. Frankly, I think we should be appalled, because this new degree is both a travesty and a tragedy. The last thing in the whole world we need of an Evangelical educational institution in an age of Biblical illiteracy is a curriculum that requires not only no Biblical languages, but much less actual Biblical content, never mind theological content or knowledge of Christian history. This is not merely a dumbed- down curriculum, it's just plain dumb, and makes no sense. This is a recipe for further bad preaching, teaching, and counseling, and will just further promote the current amnesia we find in the church about our Biblical, theological and church historical heritage.
But it's not just that the theological focus of the degree is changed in this advertised program, it also seeks to offer more tools and practical skills for ministry, at the expense of understanding the theological and Biblical character and basis of Christian ministry. I am all for practical skills and tools for ministry, but not at the expense of actual understanding of God's word, of theology and of Christian history. It's no good having tools if you don't understand their theological purpose and Biblical function and historical basis.
Imagine going to a dentist who said, "I have all the latest tools and gadgets to do oral surgery on you, but I've never actually studied what the purpose of each tool is, and how it should be carefully used.... But what the heck, look at my shiny tools! Let's operate!" The book of Hebrews tells us that the Word of God is like a two edged sword, able to penetrate between bone and marrow, soul and spirit...if properly used. But what if one doesn't understand the Bible and is preaching it anyway? What if one doesn't grasp the meaning of this or that profound theological concept but is throwing around theological words here there and yonder in impressive fashion complete with video clips and slick power point slides? What happens is distortion, and sometimes even the disabling of the congregation from its ability to understand God's Word.
What is my advice to theological schools heading in this direction, or already embracing it? Well, let me tell you a good ole N.C. story.
There was a little white frame
church near the coast of
Anyway the trustees began scraping
the little white frame church at 6 a.m. and completed that job by 7:30. Fifteen minutes later they began painting the
church, but in order to make the paint provide several coats they mixed in 30%
water into the paint. They finished
painting the first coat at 10 in the morning, and the second coat by 1 p.m., at
which point they broke for gallons of sweet tea, eastern N.C. barbecue and hush
puppies. By 2 p.m. they commenced putting
on the final coat, and by 3 p.m. they were admiring their work. The church fairly gleamed in the sun. But then in the distance over the
The rain and hail and thunder and lightning reached the church within twenty minutes, and so hard was the rain blowing, it blew horizontal up against the sides of the newly painted church and the paint began running off the walls down into the grass around the church, down into the gravel parking lot, and as the Bible says, the countenance of the trustees fell. One looked up into the sky and said....
"What did we do wrong O Lord?"
And a voice came forth from the
dark cloud and said "REPAINT, REPAINT AND THIN NO MORE!"

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon










As a student of this new program I am quite thrilled with the opportunity to pursue my MDiv from very trusted and knowledgeable professors. The Indiana Wesleyan MDiv program looks to be not so much 'weaker' as it is pragmatic.
I studied Greek for two years under Dr. Arlan Birkey. He did a fabulous job, but it's value to my ministry is tertiary. To me, Greed has little value beyond being 'puffed up' by the knowledge of it, and I can remember how to say "hoopomonae." I desire to serve in a ministry that builds on love - and love is pragmatic. I want to know how church history can contribute to my ministering the Gospel. I want Biblical study not to leave me with trivia - but to direct my steps as I serve. I want integration - hey, I want 30-45 page integration papers every semester! Not because I'm a cop-out - but because I'm excited to study divinity subjects in the manner in which I will use them.
What are we afraid of? That a 75 credit hour MDiv program based on integration rather than repetition will cheapen the immobile standards of other universities? I know fabulous Asbury MDiv grads and I know Asbury MDiv recipients that can barely teach Sunday School.
I agree with the previous statements - lets see what happens in the future. Let's pray for the students of traditional and new seminaries; that we can all be effective laborers in the missio dei (oops, did I just pull out another language?).
"In short, if you choose to take this Master of Divinity degree you may become the master of something, but it won't be Divinity, and dat's all I got to say 'bout dat!"
Could it really be that a "Master of the Divine," is this slanderous toward something not fully understood? What is he master of? I now know one place I would NOT pursue my Master's of Divinity... maybe I should check out this new program.
Witherington - in this post you sound more concerned about knowledge that puffs than the love that builds.
I love this post Dr. Witherington. I agree with you that dumming down the M.Div. will only create ministers who cannot properly use the tools that they are given. However, I also think that many schools are producing ministers that could not preach their way out of a paper bag. In addition, many of the “elite” schools are only teaching their students to be skeptical of the word through all of their education. I love the balance that you bring between biblical scholarship and vibrant spirituality. I do think that schools should not solely focus on this post-modern ideology while losing site of the great need for biblical education. There has to be a way that a balance can be struck between practical and theological.
Pretty cool post. I just came by your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your posts.I guess we learned Andy wasn't immune just really really drunk and showed up late w/o Mary Anne knowing
I'm not surprised by such "innovation" in seminary education these days. The worst forms of Church Growth have always been a mile wide and an inch thick. And I’m not surprised that many people will find this methodology a great replacement for rigorous training, and a residential, community formation for theology. Since the Fall, humans have always looked for a loophole and an easy way out. This program offered by IWU is just one step removed from buying your degree from the back page of a fundamentalist magazine. What is embarrassing is that a school that seeks to appear to be a legitimate academic community is behind this mercenary cash cow.
What bothers me more about this movement is that ATS (the accrediting body of American seminaries, not Asbury!) seems to be complacent in these matters. I will wait to see if they actually care that this incremental movement toward diploma mills in seminary education will drag other legitimate schools into their vortex. Also, small denominations, who have always had inferiority complexes over a poorly trained ministry, are rushing to get an MDiv for any one who wants one in order to make their pastorates appear to be more educated. These two important watchdogs used to be very concerned about integrity in seminary programs, but now seem to have fallen prey to expediency and pragmatism. If statistical numbers are all we are concerned about then get your copy machines out and give everyone one.
It’s pretty obvious why this curriculum is weak on church history and classical studies. These students might actually find out that the great Christian leaders and spiritualists of the past 2,000 years actually took their theological preparation very seriously. And they could see where movements like this end up: contributing to the moral and spiritual collapse of ecclesial leadership.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.