Saturday July 26, 2008
Category: Torah Reading, Torah ReadingNumbers 35:16-36:13
If he struck him with a stone tool that could cause death, and death resulted, he is a murderer; the murderer must be put to death. imilarly, if the object with which he struck him was a wooden tool that could cause death, and death resulted, he is a murderer; the murderer must be put to death. The blood-avenger himself shall put the murderer to death; it is he who shall put him to death upon encounter. So, too, if he pushed him in hate or hurled something at him on purpose and death resulted, or if he struck him with his hand in enmity and death resulted, the assailant shall be put to death; he is a murderer. The blood-avenger shall put the murderer to death upon encounter.
But if he pushed him without malice aforethought or hurled any object at him unintentionally, or inadvertently dropped upon him any deadly object of stone, and death resulted--though he was not an enemy of his and did not seek his harm--in such cases the assembly shall decide between the slayer and the blood-avenger.
The assembly shall protect the manslayer from the blood-avenger, and the assembly shall restore him to the city of refuge to which he fled, and there he shall remain until the death of the high priest who was anointed with the sacred oil. But if the manslayer ever goes outside the limits of the city of refuge to which he has fled, and the blood-avenger comes upon him outside the limits of his city of refuge, and the blood-avenger kills the manslayer, there is no bloodguilt on his account. For he must remain inside his city of refuge until the death of the high priest; after the death of the high priest, the manslayer may return to his land holding.
Such shall be your law of procedure throughout the ages in all your settlements. If anyone kills a person, the manslayer may be executed only on the evidence of witnesses; the testimony of a single witness against a person shall not suffice for a sentence of death. You may not accept a ransom for the life of a murderer who is guilty of a capital crime; he must be put to death. Nor may you accept ransom in lieu of flight to a city of refuge, enabling one to return to live on his land before the death of the priest. You shall not pollute the land in which you live; for blood pollutes the land, and the land can have no expiation for blood that is shed on it, except by the blood of him who shed it. ou shall not defile the land in which you live, in which I Myself abide, for I the Lord abide among the Israelite people.
The family heads in the clan of the descendants of Gilead son of Machir son of Manasseh, one of the Josephite clans, came forward and appealed to Moses and the chieftains, family heads of the Israelites. They said, "The Lord commanded my lord to assign the land to the Israelites as shares by lot, and my lord was further commanded by the Lord to assign the share of our kinsman Zelophehad to his daughters. Now, if they marry persons from another Israelite tribe, their share will be cut off from our ancestral portion and be added to the portion of the tribe into which they marry; thus our allotted portion will be diminished. And even when the Israelites observe the jubilee, their share will be added to that of the tribe into which they marry, and their share will be cut off from the ancestral portion of our tribe."
So Moses, at the Lord's bidding, instructed the Israelites, saying: "The plea of the Josephite tribe is just. This is what the Lord has commanded concerning the daughters of Zelophehad: They may marry anyone they wish, provided they marry into a clan of their father's tribe. No inheritance of the Israelites may pass over from one tribe to another, but the Israelites must remain bound each to the ancestral portion of his tribe. Every daughter among the Israelite tribes who inherits a share must marry someone from a clan of her father's tribe, in order that every Israelite may keep his ancestral share. Thus no inheritance shall pass over from one tribe to another, but the Israelite tribes shall remain bound each to its portion."
The daughters of Zelophehad did as the Lord had commanded Moses: Mahlah, Tirzah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Noah, Zelophehad's daughters, were married to sons of their uncles, arrying into clans of descendants of Manasseh son of Joseph; and so their share remained in the tribe of their father's clan.
These are the commandments and regulations that the Lord enjoined upon the Israelites, through Moses, on the steppes of Moab, at the Jordan near Jericho.
From Parshat Mattot-Masei. From THE TANAKH: The New JPS Translation According to the Traditional Hebrew Text. Copyright 1985 by the Jewish Publication Society. Used by permission.
Subscribe
RSS Feed
Categories
- Bible Q&A
- Bible Reading
- Bible Reading KJV
- Bible Study
- Black History Month
- Brian McLaren's "From Genesis to Revelation"
- Buddhist Wisdom
- Celebrity Spirituality
- Chicken Soup for the Soul
- Christian Wisdom
- Daily Dalai Lama
- Daily Inspiration
- Discover Jesus with Mark Galli
- Eco Tips
- Family Journal with Mary DeMuth
- Finding Ways to Be Fearless
- God's Way with Zig Ziglar
- Hearing God with Dallas Willard
- Holiday Survival Tips
- Hoping for Something Better
- How to Get More: Growing in 7 Virtues
- Inner Wisdom with Renita Weems
- Inspirational Quotes
- Jewish Wisdom
- Joke of the Day
- Learning the Art of Forgiving
- Lectionary Readings
- Lent Devotionals
- Living with Grander Vision
- Love Notes with Therese Borchard
- Max Lucado
- Prayer Circle of the Day
- Prayer of the Day
- Praying the Names of Jesus
- Spiritual Parenting with Mimi Doe
- The Healing Journey
- The Spirit of Weight Loss
- Torah Reading




Add to Newsvine
Comments
This is an interesting commentary since I was recently studying Cultural Anthropology in which a similar practice was outlined regarding marriage and the transfer of property. The major emphasis was how many cultures created a practice to ensure that their land and other possessions were not arbitrarily transferred to competitors, thereby diminishing one tribes or groups economic resources to their possible future detriment. This Torah portion may explain where such practices possibly originated.
Posted by: Scholarios-Gennadius | August 19, 2008 1:01 PM
I wonder why the Torah portion has typographical errors......
Posted by: Malcolm Robinson MD | October 29, 2008 5:19 PM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?