Conversations with God

Is the Bible the Word of God?

Wednesday June 25, 2008

The Bible contains the Word of God. But is it the only Scripture? The One and Only? Is every other 'Holy Scripture' wrong? Inaccurate? Not the truth?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Wednesday is Question and Answer Day on the blog...a time for exploring many of the questions that people have recently asked about the nine Conversations with God books and the New Spirituality. Here's this week's entry...
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Question: Do you believe the bible is the inspired word of God? Dana, at Yahoo.com

Neale's Response: Yes, I do. The entire Bible, including the Old Testament. And I believe the Qur'an is the inspired word of God. And I believe the Bahagavad-gita is the inspired word of God. And I believe the Torah is the inspired word of God. And I believe the Upanishad is the inspired word of God. And I believe the Book of Mormon is the inspired word of God. And I believe Conversations with God is the inspired word of God.

Do I believe that the Bible is the ONLY "inspired word of God"? No.

What scriptures are "holy scriptures"? What scripture contains the One and Only, True Word of God? Well, now that depends upon to whom one is speaking. Many say, the Bible. Others say, no, His word is found in the Hebrew Bible. Others say, no, His word is found in the Koran.

Others say, no, it's in the Torah.

Others say, no, in the Mishna.

Others say, the Talmud.

Others, the Bhagavad-gita.

Others, the Rig Veda.

Others, the Brahmanas.

Others, the Upanishads.

Others, the Mahabharta and the Ramayana.

Others, the Puranas.

Others, the Tantras.

Others, the Tao-te Ching.

Others, the Buddha-Dharma.

Others, the Dhammapada.

Others, The Master of Huai-nan.

Others, the Shih-chi.

Others, the Pali Canon.

Others, the Book of Mormon.

Others...

Well, the point is, many people believe that Direct Revelation -- that is, God speaking directly to Man -- has not occurred since the Holy Scriptures with which they feel comfortable were written.

And while few of those who cite these sources agree with each other theologically, many agree on one thing emphatically: their Word of God is THE Word of God; their way to paradise is THE way to paradise; their communication from Deity is THE communication from Deity.

By this measure, Conversations with God would have to be heresy; would by definition be blasphemy. Some of the adherents of the Old Books may not be clear about which old book contains the Truth, but they are clear that no new book does.

Surprisingly, even some of the newer, more theologically liberal movements deny even the possibility that God could be delivering new truth to anyone today through direct communication, and warn against such latter day revelations.

And so, at its very beginning (indeed, by its very title) Conversations with God presents a challenge, upsets the apple cart, turns most present-day theology on its ear. Yet, interestingly, few people seem to have minded; few who have read CwG seem to have any quarrel with the possibility, at least, that God has revealed Himself once more through the written word.

Indeed, I'll go further. An astonishing number of people have come forward to say that they, too, have experienced such communications. And so it turns out that my conversation with God may not be such an "uncommon dialogue" after all.

Let's explore this opening thought and see how it relates to you.

The first major concept in CWG is that God is communicating with us all of the time; has always been communicating with us; has never stopped communicating with us; and will use whatever tool is at hand to continue that communication, both now and even forever more.

TEXT REFERENCE: I talk to everyone. All the time. The question is not to whom do I talk, but who listens? -- Conversations with God - Book 1, pg. 3

So you can see, Dana, that you've asked a pretty interesting question here. And, in truth, you are the only one who can give it an answer. What do you think? Is the Bible the inspired word of God. Is the entire Bible that inspired word, including the Old Testament as well as the New? Including, say, the Book of Deuteronomy? Yes? It the Bible the only inspired word of God? What do you think, Dana? Look to see what you think, then live your life accordingly!

Love...Neale.


(Ask Neale may be accessed on a daily basis in the Messengers' Circle at Neale's personal website: www.nealedonaldwalsch.com. Each week Neale selects a question from those posted there and publishes it in this blog.)

Comments
Anonymous
July 15, 2008 2:52 AM

07.14.08


If someone has the courage
to draw out his dream from the
bosom of his soul and fight for
it’s fulfillment,there is one test
he has to overcome, that is -
Love.

Paulo Coelho

Dear Mr. Walsch!

Soon it will be five years, since the day I first held in my hands the Russian edition of “Conversations with God”. My life has been changed radically since then. Today, when I am familiar with all of your books, I can say only one thing: thank you for this great gift to the humanity.
I can’t say exactly which one of those books had the most impact on me. The first “Conversations” gave answers to many questions, that I have been searching for, throughout my entire life ( I am already in my fifties ), questions about hell, immaculate conception, punishment , revenge etc. There is no waste word in them .
Reading “Moments of Grace” I, myself , experienced something, that I can bravely call a “moment of grace”, but when I read “Home with God”, I understood how deeply I am loved, loved by Universe. Being loved is a very important thing, isn’t it? I sincerely thank you for that unforgettable experience. In my opinion there is only one title to all of your books - “Bible for today”. During these five years I told a lot of people about you and your books. To some of them I even rendered your books ,because I wanted the people, who were close to me, to have a chance to join your Revelations, to get to know your (and now mine too) God, to see the true colors of this world with eyes wide open and to understand the concept and importance of our Oneness.
Yet my most sacred wish still lives only in my mind, because I can’t find a way to accomplish it. That is - to translate your books and make them available to my people, to Armenians.
And you know what is interesting? From the moment I had the idea of translating your books into Armenian, all my business deals went down hills. I was not making enough money from my day job (I immigrated to US without any language skills and was making a living as a cab driver). I changed specialty after specialty, but the results were the same. Now I am taking classes to obtain a new profession. Soon I will graduate. Everybody guarantees job placement and a steady income. But …
Today I have a very strong suspicion, that all my business related affairs were a fiasco, just because I am not doing, what I suppose to do. Maybe my feelings were right, and all my losses is just God’s way to keep me closer to the idea of translating your books.
But there are so many obstacles. Obviously, I am limited in so many ways, to generate funds for that purpose , and most importantly, I have to provide for my family at the same time. I came up with an idea, maybe a crazy one, I don’t know, but I would like to share it with you , anyways.
As I understood, language is one of the key moments in your program “Give me 1000 men, and we will change the world”. Their is a lot of information about you and your books on the internet, but for the people with different ethnic backgrounds would have been much more interesting to know , what is exactly going on in the pages of your websites. For example a simple column in one of your sites, that will say “Languages” would make a huge difference. Anyone could click on it and choose the suitable language.
Dear Mr. Walsch! Would you be interested in something like that? Or maybe it is already done, and I just couldn’t find it. To be more specific, I am talking about Armenian language. If there was “ Armenian “ on the list of the languages, you could have introduced the concept of New God to a whole nation. I would be more than happy to be in your team and with your help and guidance organize a small group of people, to work on your new Armenian page. At the same time I could have a chance to accomplish my dream, I could translate your books into Armenian and you could publish them later on. I am hoping very much to get some kind of response from you. Thank you so much for taking the time to read my letter.


Respectfully, yours in God

Sam .
/Samvel Arakelyan/

Cyrus Rumi
July 16, 2008 6:08 PM

Very briefly : logic, history, reason, science and archaeological data all point to the fact that there are major flaws in most belief systems and the premises upon which they were founded.

It's all about 'faith' in your viewpoint, and not concrete evidence. A believer need only have faith, rationality plays no part.

Peace to you all.

Cyrus Rumi
(http://cyrusrumi.blogspot.com/)

Chief1989
July 22, 2008 3:39 PM

Cyrus,

That sounds good, until you ask what they have faith in. I may believe that eating Twinkies will get me into heaven, and hold to that belief devoutly, but if it is a lie, my belief profited me nothing.

And there is concrete evidence all around us: scientific, archaelogical, historical, astronomical, empirical. It's how you interpret the evidence that decides your viewpoint. And most people start off with previously-held presuppositions and biases that prohibits them from making an objective analysis.

A believer does have to have faith, but it matters on what you faith in. Believing sincerely in a lie will not make it become truth.

God bless,

Chief1989

Siraj
August 9, 2008 1:53 PM

Hi Neale,

It's rather perplexing to read your posting, listing religious scriptures. Why do you include Hindu scriptures with religious texts? Religion has never been associated with Hinduism as they are totally off tangent. If you had walked the talk, you would have realised the difference. Honestly, have you really delved into the Baghvad Gita or Mahabharat to even understand what you've said, leave alone believing it?

Jungblau
October 24, 2008 2:46 PM

Neale has in effect succeeded in strikig a nice well-deserved blow at the very backbone of religious fanaticism which may be dated since times immemorial. This fanaticism is for real, and is the cause of all strife and violence in much of the world today, since its assertions are, like: Your scripture is wrong, mine is right; Your god is false, mine true. Thaddeus Tea says that Hinduism is not even religion and it has so many gods, whereas all the others ARE religions even though all but one of them are false since only one says 2 + 2 = 4, and the others say something else. Tea's argument leads one nowhere. Which is 'that' religion which says 2 + 2 = 4 = Every religion thinks and says, and preaches, that it ALONE says 2 + 2 = 4.

But as Neale says, all scriptures are word of God, and not just Christianity or Judaism, or .. . God appeared at different times in different regions and said a number of ESSENTIAL things which are essentially the same in all the religions: love, kindness, nonviolence, etc., on which the Ten Commandments, or other similar dicta were made. The tales, fables, and the utterances of prophet, Messiah, ... differ, and much of it is liable to be interpreted in the wisdom or unwisdom of the interpreter - producing light of truth or heat of violence, respectively.

Hinduism has one God as the apex, and any number of gods, for air, light, water,..., even trees, mountains, ... can be visualized as god by the believer. Wise men view God in a multiplicity of forms, and in incarnations at different times. This paradigm, which differentiates all the rest of the religions, does not have to be approved by believers in other religions for a seal of its being a religion. Hindu texts also aver, and also aver through God Himself, that God can be realized by man in the way he imagines, and yet there are a few definite forms of Him which have become the common norm for so that they can all direct spiritual contemplation in congregation, or even at the individual or family level. But yes, in one sense, Hinduism is no religion, given the same facts above (in this paragrahph). It won't insist on changing your name, even your nominal allegiance of faith, or your present practices and beliefs. It wants one just to realize that God is manifest in all His creations, animate and inanimate. High end science has at last come to realize these great pinnacles of achievement of human spiritual reflection only in Hinduism, in as much as it has inferred through its own methods of investigation based on counting and measuring, that there is a single universal consciousness of which each of us is a just speck, a divine spark.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.



Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Conversations with God

Happier Than God: Turn Ordinary Life into an Extraordinary Experience

Happier Than God Neal Donald Walsch

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Conversations with God

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement