Conversations with God

More about what God wants

Saturday August 30, 2008

What does God want? That is the question before the house. What in the world does God really want? What does He want from human beings? What does He want us to think, to believe, to do?

That is the specific question we have been exploring here the last two Saturdays as our Sunday School All Week continues...

And if this topic interests you, I would strongly advise you to skim back to those last two Saturday entries here if you missed them, because in those entries we took a close look at humanity has been told that God wants with regard to...

God
God's Word and God's Messenger
Heaven and Hell
Life
Male and Female
Marriage
Sex
Homosexuality
Love
and
Money

How are you doing here? I know this is taking a while getting through this overview of What God Wants, but that's because the influence of the teachings we have all received about God runs deep. It embraces philosophical areas as well as the practical aspects of life.

Even though the following final topics touch upon concepts that we may think we'll encounter only in the abstract, the fact is that how we think about these abstractions affects--and creates--our concrete moment-to-moment experience.

So let's conclude out survey by looking at what we have been told God wants with regard to...

FREE WILL

Many humans have been told that What God Wants is for human beings to have Free Will. Thus, they may determine and decide for themselves which of the Ultimate Outcomes--heaven or hell--they wish to experience after their death. They may do as they choose at any moment, at every juncture. They are not restricted in any way.

Humans have been told that God has granted humanity this Free Will so that humans may freely choose God, freely choose God's Way, and freely choose to be reunited with God in heaven. In other words, they may freely choose to be good, as opposed to being forced to do so. God wants humans to return to God by choice. No one should be required to do so.

Human beings have also been told that under the doctrine of Free Will, while people may do as they choose, if they do not choose What God Wants they'll pay for it with continuous torture through all eternity. No element of duress is seen in this. It's simply the Way Things Are. It's Justice, at the highest level. It's God's Justice, which follows God's Judgment. It's important, therefore, to freely choose What God Wants.

One result of this teaching: Humanity's concept of freedom has been deeply affected and profoundly shaped by its understanding of what God means by "freedom." Humans have decided that freedom doesn't have to mean freedom, but can mean simply the ability to select outcomes.

This is better than having no choice at all, and so humans in positions of power have learned to use the word "freedom" to privately describe the process by which they get others to do as they as are told. People don't have to do as they are told, of course. But if they do not, there will be a price to pay. That could mean anything from having taxes audited to being thrown in jail for two years without charges being filed and without any explanation other than being labeled a threat to the security of the country. Using this measure, nations call themselves "free."

Most people, except, perhaps, the most stubborn apologists, see the contradiction in all of this. They understand perfectly well that no people are truly free who face the most horrendous outcomes imaginable if they don't do what they're told. Only a hypocrite or a fool would call such a choice "free."

Humans have learned, then, that hypocrisy--especially hypocrisy for the "right" purpose, in the "right" cause--is acceptable on earth as it is in heaven. Much of humanity's political activity has been informed by this ethic. And elsewhere within the spectrum of human activity as well, in the way many humans communicate with each other, in the way many deal with each other, it has come to be understood that the end justifies the means.

In fact, many humans have now convinced themselves that none of this is hypocrisy at all. It's simply a matter of interpretation.

And so, in this day and age, freedoms are taken away in the name of Freedom itself. Millions of people gratefully embrace the political rhetoric that says lack of freedom is what guarantees their freedom, and the religious doctrine that says their choices in life are free only if they do as they are told, because this is What God Wants.

SUFFERING

Many humans have been told that What God Wants is for suffering to be used by human beings to better themselves, and to purify their soul. Suffering is good. It earns credits, or points, in God's mind, especially if it's endured silently, and maybe even "offered up" to God. Suffering is a necessary part of human growth and learning and is, more importantly, a means by which people may be redeemed in the eyes of God.

Indeed, one whole religion is built on this belief, asserting that all beings have been saved by the suffering of one being, who died for the sins of the rest. This one being paid the "debt" said to be owed to God for humanity's weakness and wickedness. According to this doctrine, God has been hurt by the weakness and wickedness of humanity and, in order to set things straight, someone has to suffer. Otherwise, God and humanity could not be reconciled. Thus, suffering was established as a redemptive experience.

With regard to the suffering of human beings due to "natural" causes, it's not to be shortened by death under any circumstances that are not also "natural." The suffering of animals may be mercifully ended before "natural" death, but not the suffering of people. It's God and God alone who determines when human suffering shall end

One result of this teaching: Human begins have endured unimaginable suffering over extended periods in order to do God's will and not incur God's wrath in the Afterlife. Millions of people feel that even if a person is very, very old and is suffering very, very much--lingering on the verge of death but not dying, experiencing interminable pain instead--that person must endure whatever life is bringing them.

Humanity has actually created civil law declaring that people have no right to end their own suffering, nor may they assist another in ending theirs. However anguishing it may be, however otherwise hopeless a life may have become, the suffering must go on.

This is What God Wants.

MORALITY

Many humans have been told that What God Wants is a moral society.

One result of this teaching: Humanity has spent its entire history attempting to define what is moral and what is not. The challenge has been to come up with a standard for society that does not change, all the while the society itself is changing. To find this "gold standard," many societies have turned to God, or Allah, or Yahweh, or Jehovah, or whatever other name they have used to designate Deity, and have relied on their understanding of What God Wants.

Many centuries ago God's preferences in this matter were given a powerful label. They were called "natural." This is because the concept of a Deity first entered the minds of primitive humans as a result of their earliest observations of and contacts with Nature. Here was something bigger than they were, something they could not control, something they could only stand by and watch, hoping for the best.

"Hoping for the best" soon transmuted into what would now be called praying. Whoever and whatever this Deity was, early humans reasoned, it was deeply connected with Nature, and Nature was an expression of It. And so humans created gods representing the sun, moon, and stars, the weather, crops, rivers, the land, and nearly everything else, in hopes of getting some control over things--or at least getting some communication going with whoever did have control.

From this connection of God and Nature it was only a short mental hop to consider that all things having to do with deities and gods were "natural," and all things not having anything to do with deities were "unnatural." When human language came into form the words "God" and "Nature" became inextricably linked. Certain conditions, circumstances, and behaviors were then described as "natural" or "unnatural," depending upon whether they adhered to or violated the current perception of the Will of God.

That which is "unnatural" has, in turn, come to be described as "immoral"--since it's not of God, and cannot, therefore, be What God Wants. The circle thus completes itself. Anything that is not considered "natural" is considered "immoral." That includes all "unnatural" abilities, powers, behaviors--and even thoughts.

The idea that What God Wants is what is natural, and that what is natural is what is moral, has not been a perfect measure, but it has been the best that humanity has been able to do in the search for an unchanging standard. It's for this reason that humanity has been loath to change its ideas about What God Wants. Changing those ideas changes the gold standard of human behavior.

Behavior is the currency of human interaction. Beliefs about What God Wants gives value to the behavioral choices of humans, just as gold gives value to the pieces of paper called money.

Thus, in most human societies it's not an individual's actual experience, but the society's definition of it, that determines its morality. This is the case with homosexuality. It's also the case with a great many other behaviors, such as prostitution, premarital sex, depictions of explicit sexual activity, the use of peyote, marijuana, and other plants and stimulants, or even the experience of ecstasy not induced by any outside stimulant.

For instance, if one says one has had an ecstatic experience of God, but if the experience does not fall within what humanity currently defines as "natural," it's considered immoral and to be warned against and, if it's continued, to be condemned, and, if it's still continued, to be punished.

In previous times it was often punishable by torture or death. More than one saint claiming and describing such ecstasies has been martyred in humanity's long history, using such guidelines.
Those saints were killed because the people killing them were convinced that they were doing What God Wants.

DEATH

Many humans have been told that What God Wants is for their wonderful life to eventually end, at which time their opportunity to learn and to grow is over and the time to be rewarded or punished for how they have lived begins.

One result of this teaching: Many humans consider that death is a terrible thing, and something to be feared. It's the End of the Line, the Final Curtain Call, the Closing Bell. Nearly all of the imageries surrounding death are negative, fearful, or sad, not positive, uplifting, or joyful. These imageries pervade our society. A street that goes nowhere is a Dead End. A person who is badly mistaken is Dead Wrong. The spirit who comes to retrieve your soul is The Grim Reaper.

Most people do not want to even talk about death, much less experience it. No one wants to experience it before he or she has to. People cling to life, sometimes desperately. The survival instinct is the strongest human instinct of all. Our common culture supports survival as the ultimate goal. Even people who want to die are not allowed to.

On the other side of death, many people feel certain, is the Final Judgment. If you have not been good, it's at this point that you'll go to hell. Your payment for all of your sins in this way is What God Wants.

Humanity's list of What God Wants is very long and covers many other areas of human experience not discussed in the past three installments here. That list forms the basis of innumerable civil laws, cultural traditions, social mores, and familial customs that touch all human beings.

So what do you think about what you're read here? With allowances for a few exceptions in wording here and there, or a slight difference in interpretation, is this basically what you remember being taught about What God Wants?

If it is, you have a lot of company. Millions of people have had the same experience.

Nay, billions.

And we'll explore more of this next Saturday as we continue to excerpt the CwG text, What God Wants (Atria Books).

Now, a little respite from all this theological exploration, with a touch of poetry from m.Claire. This week's offering...

Is it You
who speaks first?

When the veils lay or lift
is it Me
who initiates it?

When a longing returns
Beloved,
was it You
who first felt it?

Beloved,
I cannot even laugh
without wondering
if you laugh, too.
I cannot cry,
without then reaching out
to touch your cheek.
And when I leave
the Heart
and enter Forgetting
I try not to look
for You there.

But you are the beginning
and I am the ending
of
every footstep.

Every footstep.

(Is It You? - m. claire - copyright 2007 - all rights reserved)

For more of the work of this new American poet, go to www.mclairepoet.com.

Comments
susan
August 31, 2008 9:17 PM

Don, I understand where you're coming from. Its an issue that runs very deep. I think alot of both the occurance in ancient times and now have more to do with the failings of society. I know women who have chosen abortion in their lives, who felt at the time that they were making the most accurate decision albeit a very heartwrenching one. They felt a loss and continued through life wondering what might have been and devastating guilt. I know one woman in particular who erected a monument where she might go to grieve her lost child and worked with the local outreach to administer ultrasounds to women contemplating abortion. Coming from a place of understanding and not judgment she is still convincing women to either keep their babies or give them up for adoption. I myself am against abortion but I cannot hear these women's stories without thinking that our moral & religious expectations regarding sex have contributed to this just as much as the Molech worshipper's apparent lack of it. To just compare this to blood thirsty sex crazed worshippers of Molech is to take the human element away completely. As long as society does nothing to provide alternatives and support, then simply prohibiting abortion will not stop it. When we take away the shame and condemnation of having sex, or being unmarried single & pregnant, and provide education, birth control, counselling, assistance to those unable to provide for a child, and advocate adoption when prevention fails, and even make the adoption process easy, then we are at least chipping away at the underlying problem. Understand, as I said, I am anti abortion. But before we point fingers at anyone and imply that they are evil, we ought to take stock at how maybe it is our own pointing fingers that have caused the thing.

lori a lepore
September 1, 2008 2:53 PM

I have had a couple of abortions when i was young and ignornant about the word of God. I have become very spiritual and know what I did was so wrong even though at the time I thought it was right. I know God has forgiven me but I always think about what could have been and how my life would have been different. I thing know that I would have had my only little army of Christians. I do not believe in abortion. There are so many alternatives now, and people should be educated more. Especially now that teen pregancy is so high. I now live and breath Our Lord. Praise to you Lord and please help our nation at a time when we need it the most! Thanks be to God. AMEN

susan
September 1, 2008 3:19 PM

Don,

Did prohibition get rid of alcohol? Drugs? Prostitution? Sodomy?

susan
September 1, 2008 4:31 PM

(yes I've done that too Don)

Don,
I see your point, but I still see it differently. Everyone knows that there is a penalty for those things but when the desire is there, a person will find a way to do it, then the idea is how not to get caught rather than not doing it. If there is one less murderer on the street, perhaps another is being born, take away guns and a person will use anything as a weapon in their absence. A thief learns to get more crafty and a perscription drug user learns how to lie and manipulate to get what they want, a speeder buys a radar detector, etc..... so is society really safer or has it all just been driven into the shadows where we can't see it so well?

iflung
September 5, 2008 12:14 PM

what god wants.
if in reading your books and all my spiritual understanding the only thing god wants is what i want in this moment in time.for i am one with all who read this and don't read it, so we all are god doing what we want as god at the same time in the moment.
how many people can't understand we are all one there is no other apart from that we call god.
there is no devil or evil in this world other than actions of god in the moment,and we judge them actions as to the understandings we have been pushed upon by our parents and there parents and so on.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.



Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Conversations with God

Happier Than God: Turn Ordinary Life into an Extraordinary Experience

Happier Than God Neal Donald Walsch

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Conversations with God

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement