Here's a story to knock you back: The Rev. James Moran, a Catholic priest in DC, has resigned (and been removed from) active ministry to protest the U.S. Catholic bishops' disgraceful handling of the priest sex-abuse scandal. Here is his resignation letter (PDF).
Father Moran says he was raped as a seminarian in 1970, and nobody in the hierarchy cared to do anything about it; his rapist went on to abuse minors. Read the WaPo account; Father Moran is clearly a broken man. He wrote in a letter to his parishioners that the US bishops "are more concerned with the things of this world than they are in simply Christian justice. … I have loved serving the Church, but I cannot go against my conscience in standing up to the bishops in calling for them to take responsibility."
Someone in the comment boxes below wanted to know how I could make the comment that I did about seeing the damaging effect of centralized power on ordinary people and still affirm the Catholic hierarchy. The answer is that the abuse of power doesn't invalidate the structure that bad men used to abuse the powerless. Nevertheless, the scandal itself has precipitated a crisis of faith in me. In 2002, when a prominent archbishop was trying to get me to quit writing so critically about our scandal-ridden church, I told him that I believed Catholic laypeople had a duty to speak out, because I no longer trusted the bishops to take care of the problem. He responded by saying that if I didn't trust the bishops, how could I still be Catholic? Well, I told him, my faith depends not on the competence or goodness of bishops, but on the teachings of the church.
Four years on, I admit that I struggle mightily with this. I still believe it's true, but the faith we hold, if it is to have meaning, must be incarnate. It can't be merely an abstract thing, merely a pleasant ideal. The moral malfeasance of the American bishops do not invalidate the faith by any stretch, but for some people--like Father Moran, apparently--it can be such a scandal that they find it impossible to continue in their relationship with the church.
I can't get out of my mind the stories I've been told by victims and their families, nor the stories I've been told by priests of what they've seen, but won't talk about because they are afraid of being punished by their bishops. It wears me down, I confess. The trust left long ago, as did the expectation that any of these bishops will be held to justice by the Vatican or the criminal courts, but it's the loss of the joy that I find so difficult to deal with.
I look at my two little boys and worry about the lousy icon of Christ that I, their father, am presenting to them. It used to not be this way, but Father Tom Doyle warned me five years ago that if I kept digging into the scandal, I would have to confront a kind of darkness that I would not be prepared for. I believed him, but having gotten into the story by investigating how the Archdiocese of New York had covered up for three priests who had taken sexual advantage of a fatherless immigrant teenage boy, I figured I couldn't look away.
That boy's father was in Nicaragua when his mother took him to the priests looking for a father figure until her husband could get to New York. And when the father arrived, and discovered what had happened, he went straight to the Archdiocese, which offered to cut him a check in exchange for his signing over the right to his legal counsel to the Archdiocese's lawyers. The father might have been a simple immigrant laborer, but he had enough sense to see what was happening, and to walk out, get him a non-Catholic lawyer, and take the Archdiocese to court. At the time, I thought: of course I'm going to keep looking; I have a Catholic son of my own, and I want to do this for the sake of that immigrant father and his son, and all those like him.
That was 2001, before the Boston blow-up and everything after. Five years later, I look at my two little boys and am as certain as I am of anything else that if either of them had been raped by a Catholic priest, that they and their mother and me would have been treated like dirt by the bishop and his representatives. And that is a thought that sits in my heart and mind like a radioactive rock that I cannot manage to dislodge.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I just finished "Crunchy Cons". I have already identified 6 people who i will give a copy to. Reminds me of "What's so Great about America". Dinesh D'Souza, not sure why.
Anyway, I struggle when people identify themselves as "Methodists", "Protestants", "Catholics", etc.
The problems with all organizations or labels like these is that they align us with men rather than Christ.
I do understand the concept of faith traditions but striving to understand our alignment, identification with and relationship with Christ seems to be infinitely more substantial, insightful and "dialog worthy". It is somewhat similar to reading a commentary on the Bible rather than the Bible itself. The actual words of Jesus are infinitely more powerful and meaningful.
On the flip side, i like the idea of having a label like "Crunchy Con" to summarize my views and temporary predispositions.>
I am responding to Dan Parman's comment above. Having difficulty identifying with a particular group (Catholic, Protestant, Democrat, etc.) is one of the problems that is being discussed on this web site and in so many other forums lately. In several articles I've read here and elsewhere, the authors talk about how some Democrats are trying to deal with the fragmentation of the Democratic party by creating a unifying theme of working for the common good vs. what some people view as the rampant individualism and materialism of the Republican party. The reason that I think it's necessary to give oneself a label when it comes to one's central beliefs is that it's not just one's own individual beliefs and interpretations that are important but also the sharing, strengthening, celebrating, and acting upon those beliefs with other humans. One's individual relationship with Christ can be created only by means of the material world, that is, through spoken and/or written words and interactions with other human beings. If you decide to limit your understanding of and relationship with Christ only to your own reading and interpretation of the Bible, then you're saying that the whole history of Christianity is irrelevant and that no person or organization has anything significant to add to your own relationship with Christ. Of course, aligning yourself with any particular human organization can be a difficult compromise because you have to deal with the corruption, evil, and stupidity of that institution, which was the whole subject of the article upon which we are both commenting, the Catholic sex abuse issue. Many people decide to sever ties with an organization when they believe that its failures have changed its essential nature. However, for me, my relationship with Christ was created and is constantly renewed by my Catholicism. I could never, on my own, have come up with the liturgy, theology, or knowledge of history that have been essential to my understanding of Christ. The very fact that Jesus actively participated in his society and his religion, although He often challenged both, has reinforced for me the idea that we also have to work through human institutions, as well as challenge them when necessary.>
So....maybe the Catholic hierarchy should ask "What Would Jesus Do?" Would the answer be: 'hide the truth, show no compassion for the victims, maintain a culture where evil is allowed to persist?...I doubt it.
The best argument I hear against continuing to talk about sexual abuse in the Church is that many priests are doing very good things for the community, and they are also being victimized by those who are not -or by us, pointing out only the negative...
Well, that argument is good for only so long. There are only three choices for people of good will: (1) take back the Church, (2) abandon the Church, or (3) deny that any objectionable activities ever happened and in the process lose your soul. It is our choice!>
Priests who sexually abuse children should be treated like any other sexual predator. They should be tried through the legal system and then summarily imprisoned. A book called Silent Whispers In Stone Garden by J.A.Z.I. (though a work of fiction based on real-life events) illustrates just how serious this atrocity really is. Not only does it destroy any chance the victim has for a normal life, but it also puts others at risk as well. Shame on our government for allowing this to go on and on and on and......>
chistes sexistas
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.