Crunchy Con

Today's Boycott

Monday May 1, 2006

I'm not sure what I think of it. Here's what's going through my head.

1. I think the Latino activists will overreach with this. It's my impression that they have no idea what kind of backlash is building up. It will be very hard for them to overcome the widespread use of the Mexican flag in the first mass demonstrations. For many people, the meme that "these are foreigners who are demanding rights that they don't have" stuck then, and it will be hard to erase. I've been reading stories saying that some Latino leaders worry that the day will be a bust for them politically, because they are using up all their ammo early in the immigration reform process. Maybe so. But what I'm more concerned about/interested in is the backlash from conservatives and others who can't understand why the laws of the United States don't matter here.

2. Why don't the laws of the United States matter here, anyway? What does it say about our country that we cannot control our borders? Nothing good.

3. At the same time, it bothers me--a lot--that there is no small degree of outright racism present. Yes, the Aztlan loons are guilty of the same thing, but I wonder how many anti-immigrant hardliners have trouble seeing the illegals as human beings. On the other side, I hate it when pro-immigrant activists and others assume that any opposition to the amnesty plan can only come from racist motive.

4. One thing going mostly undiscussed in all this is the role illegal immigration is playing in holding down unskilled wages. There was a startling story in the LA Times last week detailing conflict between blacks and Latinos over illegal Mexican immigration. Blacks at this protest say that their unskilled labor jobs are disappearing and going to Latinos who work off the books; Latinos say blacks are just lazy. Ugliness all around--and I don't know who's more right. This issue stands to fracture all kinds of political alliances--grassroots Republicans from business Republicans, African-Americans and labor from mainstream and Hispanic Democrats.

5. Furthermore, I have a feeling that we in the mainstream media don't have a good handle on this aspect of the story, in part because we don't have to worry about losing our jobs to illegal immigrants. All we have to worry about is losing our gardeners and maids (I say "we," but I don't have a gardener, and the maid who comes once a week is American; the point is, the class hit hardest by illegal immigration is Not Our Own, Dear). Similarly, illegal immigrant workers aren't filling up rental houses in our neighborhoods, and bringing crime and disorder to previously calm and family-oriented neighborhoods.

6. I wonder how all the grassroots anti-immigrant folks would feel if they were showed how the low prices for consumer goods and services that they've come to expect as a constitutional right depend largely on the presence of the 11 million illegal immigrant workers they oppose? Would we American citizens be willing to pay higher consumer prices for the sake of closing the borders? I would, because I think all workers, whatever their ethnicity, should make a just wage. But I think I'm in the minority on that, at least on the Right.
Advertisement
Comments
Michael
May 2, 2006 9:03 PM

"My father came to this country as an immigrant and did it the legal way"

Tell your mother that when her father came here, we had practically open borders without any quotas or limitations. Of course he came here legally, there was no reason to come illegally since everyone was allowed in. Comparing immigration policy from 50-75 years ago is completely absurd.>

comradesoul
May 2, 2006 10:03 PM

Comrade Rod,
No need to remain on the fence. Here is my viewpoint.

First, and I mean first, close the border tight. That is necessary for stopping the drug trafficing, the terrorist issue and the ILLEGAL immigrant issue. Not 100% I know but in the 90% bracket at least.

Then talk about what to do with the illegals. I am not into blaming them as they have been baited and allowed to continue this for several decades by our government and big business.

So instead of cracking down on them let's crack down on the employers BIG TIME. Let them earn citizenship by paying some fines and jumping through some other hoops and get them on the books at wages with workers comp. and health care that put them into competition with the workers who jobs they are now stealing.

Then set up a guest worker program and let some come back and forth from mexico or wherever through the front door and with some dignity.

But it is all useless until the border is closed tight.

comradesoul>

sue
May 2, 2006 11:12 PM
none

Your last paragraph left me speechless. As a grandmother who shops a couple of times a week, I have watched the prices on everything rise every week, every month every year. In particular, if politicians and those who make a "good" living had to shop on a budget, they would instantly see that illegals or no illegals, prices have increased 25% to 50% on everything a family needs to live.

My first new car in early 1970 was a Toyota..I paid $2,000! Today a Toyota can't be had for less than $20,000 for a stripped model, and the illegals had nothing to do with it!>

Thresher
May 3, 2006 8:32 AM
http://www.embargowellsfargo.com/

Rod,

If you're going to impugn "no small degree of outright racism" to people who want immigrantion law enforced, then give some examples.>

stolzi
May 4, 2006 4:20 PM

I gotta say you stunned me, Rod, with the offhand reference to the "maid." Doesn't this undercut the picture of the lovely stay-at-home wife, and the low pay of a journalist that you're forced to support her on?

Now, with three children soon to be in your house, and (iirc) plans for Julie to home school them, I can understand what you're doing. And I was never averse to household help when I had it myself. But it was a startler. Might be better from a cosmetic point of view if you refer to her as a "cleaning lady" - assuming that is what she does.

By the way, is she legal, and do you pay the appropriate taxes?>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.