Books & Culture on "Crunchy Cons"
Eric Miller's Books & Culture review of "Crunchy Cons" is available online. I'm pleased to be able to say that I called Eric after I first read this piece, and enjoyed talking to him so much that his comments -- which address a problem with the book he identifies in his review -- have become a key part of the new chapter I wrote for the paperback edition.
I enjoy meta-discussions. "Why are we here?" is always an interesting question, even if no one is able to answer it.
For the record, I'm here because ideas are more important than how well they are presented, and even (from my POV, of course) an Ann Coulter is worth reading if only to keep the Harsh Light of Reality shining on all things. There is nothing that cannot be faced, nothing that is not worth viewing in the light.
I'm here, also, because I find the concept of a crunchy con disingenuous, but I'm willing to be educated, and what better source than the person who started the discussion in the first place?
If you haven't visited my listed "homepage", you should also know that I am a Pagan, on the libertarian (small-l) side of the liberal spectrum, and I just can't pass up a good debate.>
Bubba,
But what justifies Rod's particular bashing of conservatives, painting mainstream conservatives as godless materialists and the GOP base as homophobes?
While I wouldn't necessarily agree with Rod's rhetorical choices, the answer could be because they demonstrate the qualities listed. (I generally stay away from calling anyone "godless", even when they espouse agnostic or atheistic positions, or reject anthropomorphism as I do. I dislike the connotations of the word.)
I suggest you browse Michael Lerner's The Left Hand of God. He has some interesting observations of the religious/political right to offer, and he makes a very strong effort to avoid name calling.
Oh, and homophobia is a very reasonable conclusion to such rhetoric as defense of marriage and "...they are going to destroy the institution." Fear is a avery apt description. We had little difficulty calling them racists when "negro" was substituted for homosexual. One thing history teaches us, is that there is very little new under the sun when it comes to whipping up the masses against the scapegoat du jour.>
Rod, I think you have found an unimpeachable example of your constituency in Franklin Evans.>
Rod, I think you have found an unimpeachable example of your constituency... who can't seem to get a direct and informative response from Kathleen Reilly.
I'm sure I'll survive without it, but dialogue is the spice of life.>
What about those of us that do like "crunchy" part, but just not too sure about the "con" part?>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.