Crunchy Con

The full Britney

Thursday June 29, 2006

Yes, yes, we'll get to the Gitmo ruling in a second, but first I want to try to apply the calculus of moral theology to my deliberation over the news that a mondo pregmo Britney Spears has posed nude for a magazine cover. If somebody would please send me the Latin translation of "hoochie mama," it would aid my endeavor.
Advertisement
Comments
god_is_in_the_tv
July 1, 2006 6:34 PM

Adam-


It would seem to mean that we can't say anything about bad morals unless the subject is either the worst example known or we've already provided a listing of every worse incidence (vs. the version I referred to, in which we can't say anything at all unless it's the worst thing going).


Bzzzzt - sorry man, but you're not reading me - let me try again.

It has nothing to do with listing every worse incident first before being allowed to talk about the minor ones.

Nor is my contention that to bytch about something, one musy only bytch about the worstest example ever known to human kind.

My contention is that is one is going to screed about "morality," then one should at least be consistent. If one has given a pass to something egregiously immoral in the past, then one's credibility in labeling something else as "immoral" is suspect.

Just so long as you're internally consistent, then go right ahead and screed away, homie!>

Adam
July 1, 2006 8:03 PM

TV God--

Has it occurred to you that honest people can diagree about what is immoral?>

god_is_in_the_tv
July 2, 2006 4:37 PM

Not when they supposedly claim that the bible and the Church are authoritative...


And cut it out with the "TV God" thing. If you can't take the time to type out my name, then just say "hey you.">

T.G. Scott
July 3, 2006 6:55 PM

I believe Britney is to be pitied for her shameless grappling to hold on to a dead-end career. I do find her annoying, however, and will quickly flip the remote if I see her or her greasy little weasel of a husband on TV. I think this is a silly, naivem, young woman whose mother never impressed upon her to get an education or learn any life skills because she wrongly believed her child would be a superstar forever. Some child stars stay on the periphery of show biz, but most of them are probably stuck selling Amway, real estate, or insurance in their real adult lives. And there's nothing at all wrong with any of those latter means of making a living. It's just that one should treat showbiz, like it's sister, modeling, as a short-timer kind of a thing. Your shelf life is pretty short in both of those endeavors.>

No one important
July 4, 2006 1:00 AM

"My unnatural revulsion at Ms. Spears leads me to think she might be a better example of America gone wrong than any robber barons."

I agree. Ms. Spears' own very personal, moral inconsistancies reflect those of much of our society, although she does it in a much more public way than most.

She seems to be able to make anything she does dirty by endorsing it without thinking, exercising judgement, or discretion. Blindly and stupidly acting on your trendy convictions is worse than generalized apathy.

Anybody remember the sculpture "The Birth of Sean Preston"? Trying to embrace the "culture of life", she became the subject for a vulgar nude sculpture of herself giving birth. It didn't have to be vulgar, and certainly that subject could make a beautiful sculpture, but something in Ms. Spears's manner in posing profaned herself and the birth of her son. It was too self-centered, too sexual. It was, come to think of it, very similar to what she did to her family in her interview with Matt Lauer.

Our society does this. Ms. Spears is not the exception. Everyone thinks they have to have an opinion on everything, rather than prioritizing and having a few, but well thought out and accomplished, opinions and investments. We live in a world that puts pressure on being opinionated and vocal, not on being wise and careful. It takes effort and time to become wise and careful, and most of us either don't have the time or are too lazy to follow through. In fact, her behavior has some striking similarities to our President's (albeit on different issues in different ways).>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.