Crunchy Con

Has World War III begun?

Monday July 10, 2006

Continuing the Chicken-Little-ism today, take a look at NY Daily News columnist Michael Goodwin's bit today declaring that World War III has begun. Excerpt:

It's not perfectly clear when it started. Perhaps it was after the Berlin Wall fell and the Cold War ended. Perhaps it was the first bombing of the World Trade Center, in 1993.

What is clear is that this war has a long fuse and, while we are not in the full-scale combat phase that marked World Wars I and II, we seem to be heading there. The expanding hostilities mean it's time to give this conflict a name, one that focuses the mind and clarifies the big picture.


Well, okay, but does "World War III" really serve that purpose? I don't think so. Y'all have any ideas? And do you think Goodwin is panicking, or is he onto something? I think both. Anyway, it started in 1914. This phase of it is going to be the worst of all, I fear.
Advertisement
Comments
Terrence Berres
July 12, 2006 6:18 PM
http://terrenceberres.com

David J. White prefaces his suggestion, "If, as the article suggests, the war is really a reaction against American power (and the Modernity that it supports), and that at the end of the day America might end up going it alone ..."

On those assumptions, I suggest "Mageddon 'r' US".>

Interpreter
July 12, 2006 7:31 PM
www.geocities.com/bmidyet/

Actually, Osama Bin Laden says he hates the US because we support Israel. So the war is really a reaction against Israel.
Or to use your terms Terrence, "Mageddon 'r' Israel". The US just happens to be her chief ally.>

Matt Swaim
July 13, 2006 8:12 AM
http://apoloblogology.blogspot.com

I've come to believe that "WW III" is meant to incorporate anything between 1945 and the eventual nuclear destruction of us all (God forbid). The incremental nature of this war shouldn't necessitate our reluctance to define it as such.>

DS
July 17, 2006 6:16 AM

World War III won't have defined war boundaries.

The US didn't topple Saddam for oil - we give the Saudi's free run of the US for that.

If you study your History - when Islam decides to go to war - it's long, hard and global.>

curiouser and curiouser
August 2, 2006 7:10 PM

Interpreter,

You said: "The west wins, and a thousand years of peace follows."

How will we know we've "won"? Can/does any side in a war actually "win"?>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.