Crunchy Con

TAC: Heather Mac Donald

Thursday July 27, 2006

The Manhattan Institute's Heather Mac Donald believes that the conservative movement is alienating people like here: atheist or agnostic conservatives who are conservative not in spite of their skepticism, but because of it. She says that the conservative movement "is crippling itself by leaning too heavily on religion to the exclusion of these temperamentally compatible allies."

The presumption of religious belief -- not to mention the contradictory thinking that so often accompanies it -- does damage to conservatism by resting its claims on revealed truth. But on such truth there can be no agreement without faith. And a lot of us do not have such faith -- nor do we need it to be conservative. ... Skeptical conservatives do not look into the abyss when they make ethical choices. Their moral sense is as secure as a believer's. They do not need God or the Christian Bible to discover the golden rule and see themselves in others.

...So maybe religious conservatives should stop assuming that they alone occupy the field. Maybe they should cut back a bit on their rleigious triumphalism. Nonbelievers are good conservatives, too. As Michael Cromartie of the Ethics and Public Policy Center has advised, it should be possible for conservatives to unite on policy without agreeing on theology.
Advertisement
Comments
Jeff
July 27, 2006 11:27 PM

Do you have a link to her story?>

Jeff
July 27, 2006 11:29 PM

Sorry. Never mind. Needed to scroll down.>

Art Deco
July 27, 2006 11:56 PM
http://wwrtc.blogspot.com

Heather MacDonald is best known as a defender of the probity of law enforcement. She is an able advocate (second to none, really), but her field of interest is not that of the most salient social problems (which is fine).


Leaving aside Nat Hentoff and the late Christopher Lasch, are there any prominent secularists who make it a point to concern themselves with those aspects of the age that make it as appalling as it is? Mayble 'religious conservatives' assume 'they alone occupy the field' because their unchurched auxilliary is (when it counts) a corporal's guard.>

Franklin Evans
July 28, 2006 1:38 AM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Thanks for clarifying, Tom. Please redirect my comments to the general "you".>

henry
July 28, 2006 4:27 PM

Testing.>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.