This readiness to take offense is not yet terrorism -- but it is a sign of the deep-down insecurity of the Muslim psyche in the modern world. In the presence of Islam, we all feel, you have to tread carefully, as though humoring a dangerous animal. The Koran must never be questioned; Islam must be described as a religion of peace -- isn't that the meaning of the word? -- and jokes about the prophet are an absolute no-no. If religion comes up in conversation, best to slip quietly away, accompanying your departure with abject apologies for the Crusades. And in Europe, this pussyfooting is now being transcribed into law, with "Islamophobia" already a crime in Belgium and momvements across the continent to censor everything at which a Muslim might take offense, including articles like this one.
Scruton goes on to say that it is wrong to give gratuitous insult to anyone's faith, and that we non-Muslims should extend to Muslims the same toleration and goodwill we'd expect them to give us. But you have to wonder, says Scruton, where Muslims stand on this matter. They are in many cases fanatically intolerant. Writes Scruton: "Ordinary Christians, who suffer a daily diet of ridicule and skepticism, cannot help feeling that Muslims protest too much, and that the wounds, which they ostentatiously display to the world, are largely self-inflicted."
Hear, hear. Scruton concludes by saying that Christians and Jews are "heirs to a long tradition of secular government" that maintains that human societies should be governed by human laws that should take precedence over religious edicts. Citizens must obey the state, and whatever they do with their spiritual lives is between them and God. Against this tradition -- which Scruton says is enshrined in Christianity by what Kierkegaard and Hegel identified as the Christian faith's "spirit of irony," which is to say the ability to stand outside of yourself and see things from other perspectives -- comes the humorlessness of the Muslim fundamentalists, whose belief that all secular laws are blasphemous the rest of us see as a sign of fanaticism, but which many pious Muslims see as a religious requirement.
Once the Muslim world learns not to take itself so seriously, then we can talk about making peace, says Scruton. To that end, check out these Muslim comedians.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I can't say I agree with either Basileus or Anonymous. Sure, Islam is younger- but the more important thing is context. The Christian world became tolerant on its own, without any external impetus. With every external factor arguing for tolerance Islam is resisting to the very fibre of its being.
The comparison is strained at best.>
This is inane. How can one prove humor is more prevalent in one religion as opposed to another. Humor is a pretty subjective judgment. Based on my experiences, if you ask me which Christain denomination is the most humor impaired, I would rank Catholicism right up there. I would attribute this to "one true faith" orientation of Catholicism. I would regard Unitarians as having their sense of humor intact, but then they don't believe in much of anything either. Fanatics exist in every religion. Why they even exist in my own family, and we're not even Muslim.
The column gives the impression that Islam is being accorded special protection from ridicule in Europe. I note a recent news item in which German prosecutors considered prosecuting Madonna for "insulting religion" for portraying the crucifixtion during her recent act. It would appear some European cultures may be more conservative about discussion of religion in general, and have gone so far as to embody these sentiments in their penal codes. This has nothing to do with Islam, but with European culture.>
Milan Kundera in one his novels observed that the only people to be truly afraid of in Communist Czechoslovakia were those who never smiled. In this regard Islam has surfeit of humourless men and women. I am not sure though that Ahmedinutjob's wild grimace in the manner of Clint Eastwood would count as a smile.>
German prosecutors considered prosecuting Madonna for "insulting religion"
And did they?
I mean ... is that the best you can do in your Hunt For Moral Equivalence? Not a single stoning, whipping, beheading?>
The real question is: why have Muslims in our society at all? Those in Britain and elsewhere should be encouraged to leave. The vast majority are either immigrants or first generation with family ties back to the home countries. Drastically reduce the number of Muslims in the West, and the problem of 'oversensitivity' will dissappear.>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.