Crunchy Con

9/11 and anger

Sunday September 10, 2006

I suspect I'll post less on 9/11 than I otherwise might have. I had to turn off ABC's excellent "Path to 9/11" miniseries tonight, because I was so filled with anger and emotion just watching it that I didn't know what to do. I still have a pounding tension headache from it. I spent pretty much the entire year after 9/11 living with this anger. I had to start wearing a mouth guard as I slept at night, because I ground my teeth so much. I remember the smell of burning human flesh hanging over our neighborhood in Brooklyn for that first week. On 9/12, I went into a Catholic parish in Bay Ridge, and found it filled at noon with people praying. It had a dome, and smoke from the pile had gathered there, like incense hovering over the faithful. I remember what the sunlight looked like passing through it. It smelled like burning wire, with a faint note of sweetness. That was the human flesh.

I went to several firefighter funerals that fall. One in particular comes to mind now. We lost eight firemen from our neighborhood station. After one of the funerals, which I observed from the sidewalk (the church was too full to get in), I saw the dead man's wife and small children come out. The boy was wearing his father's hat. After everyone gave them condolences, they finally made their way down the Brooklyn street, until nobody could see them anymore. I followed them from a distance, and watched them load up into the minivan and drive away, into the rest of their lives.

I wonder where those kids are now? I'm also thinking tonight about John Rigo. Nice guy -- we met him when we were in Rome in early 2001 for the consistory. He and his wife Betsy were in our little inexpensive hotel, the Due Torre. They were taking their young nephew Jackson on a tour of Europe. We met them for breakfast a couple of times, and really enjoyed their company. John was killed instantly in his WTC office when Mohammed Atta flew his plane into the north tower.

It occurred to me today that within a space of one year, we had 9/11, and the breaking open of the Catholic priest sex scandal, first in Boston then elsewhere. I got so overcome with anger about all of those things that a military chaplain friend suggested to me that I should see a counselor or something, because it sounded to him like I had PTSD. He told me he'd been worried about that ever since I'd told him on 9/11 that I'd seen the south tower fall. So I went to see a Catholic psychotherapist in NYC, hoping that someone who understood something about Christian spirituality would be better able to help me deal with all the rage I still had at the hijackers, which had gotten all mixed up with fury at abuser priests and the bishops who enabled them.

That was going okay, until the third meeting, when he attacked me for having written a piece in the Wall Street Journal saying that John Paul had "let us down" by not disciplining the US church more firmly regarding the sex scandal. The therapist literally began yelling at me. He called me a "new Luther." He kept yelling, saying that I was going to lose my soul and destroy my marriage if I kept writing these things about the Church. He told me that the demons had hold of me. He told me that only the saints have the right to question a Pope's judgment, but being saints, they never would do so. He went on like this for an hour. I was so shell-shocked at the end of it that I just paid my money and shuffled out. A day or two later, I wrote him and accused him of malpractice, and told him if he didn't apologize and refund my money I was going to turn him in to the state licensing board. I got my money back. I wish I had turned him in all the same. God knows how many other people he browbeat like that.

That fall, I was in another American city for Thanksgiving, far away from NYC. I was at a big Thanksgiving dinner. All I could think about was what had happened only a couple of months earlier. Everybody at the party chattered happily about everything else but 9/11. I found myself sitting quietly, fighting anger. I was overwhelmed by emotion over the 9/11 loss, and being thankful for my country and for the firefighters and all the rest, but I was also nearly overwhelmed with anger over the fact that no one else at that party seemed to be paying any mind at all to the solemnity of the occasion. And then I got mad at myself for being mad at them. Why should they have been as morose as I was? It didn't happen to their city. They didn't see it take place with their own eyes. It was a TV event for them. I had no right to hold anything against them. What was wrong with me?

Anger. You make bad decisions out of anger. I was gung-ho for the Iraq War out of anger, out of wanting a sense of vengeance. But I do think that being angry, still, about what was done to my city and my country and people I know on that day keeps me paying attention to things that a lot of people don't think to pay attention to, or don't want to pay attention to, and it keeps me passionate about them. So is anger constructive? Yes, it can be. But it can also mislead and destroy. I hate with the purest hate over 9/11 stuff. I'm not proud of it -- quite the contrary -- but it's difficult to control. Once in Dallas, I was in an editorial board meeting -- I'd been here only a few months, which is to say not quite two years after 9/11 -- and some expatriate American author was talking to us. We were looking for something to ask him about, so I asked him what it was like living in Panama on 9/11, watching what was happening back in the US. He said that there's a large Arab community in his city, and they were celebrating the events in New York and Washington, and really, can you blame them? I started shaking with rage -- literally shaking -- and had to get up to leave the room. I think I might have gone across the table to get the guy if I had stayed. I've never been so angry, at anything or anyone.

If I know what's good for me, I'll keep the TV off tomorrow. But I never know what's good for me about this stuff. For some reason, I have to watch everything about 9/11 that's ever on. I have to look at every picture. I think all the time about what it was like to be in those towers when they started to fall. Sometimes, even now, I fall asleep thinking about everything that happened on that day. I can't decide if that's a matter of keeping faith, or a matter of being trapped.

P.S. to those who posted in the comboxes on an earlier thread. I deleted that one, because one of the usual handful of idiots who comes around here with her deranged spitefulness provoked me into acknowledging her existence. I don't want that stain on this blog, so I deleted it. Remember that Beliefnet won't let me ban any of these people. They just have to be endured. I'm sure they will trash this combox with their musings, but I won't be responding. Sorry if I deleted your post -- feel free to repost on this thread if you like.
Advertisement
Comments
Joseph D'Hippolito
September 12, 2006 6:41 AM

We find that forgiving is not excusing, nor is it somehow spitting in the eye of victims. It is, simply, handing one who has done us real evil over to the mercy of God and giving up our completely futile attempt to make them pay by chewing the cud of our own rage. It frees us to love those who have suffered and it frees us from the power of evil men to continue dominating our lives long after they are dead.

Mark, would that you take your own words to heart. If you did, perhaps you would stop engaging in unprovoked personal attacks on those who disagree, let alone obsess about them. Perhaps you would stop deliberately distoring their position. Perhaps you would stop responding to legitimate points with vicious sarcasm and venal vindictiveness.

Don't tell me that you don't know what I'm talking about. You know very well what I'm talking about.

And don't tell me that you forgive me or have forgiven me. If you did, then you wouldn't engage in the above behavior, would you?

Besides, we as Christians have greater responsibilities than being freed from the power of evil men to control us. We have the responsibility to defend the innocent from such evil me. We have the responsibility to defend society from them. Unfortunately, sometimes we have to use nasty and untidy means to do so (see WWII).

Then again, like most Catholic bloggers, you've never let such mundane things as reality and behavioral consistency interfere with your fleshly desire to spin webs of esoteric, etherial rhetoric -- and to trap those you don't like in them.>

Rod Dreher
September 12, 2006 3:21 PM

Joe, please don't bring your personal dispute with Mark to this site. I'm trying hard to get the personal attacks etc. out of this forum, so we can concentrate on discussing and arguing on issues and positions.>

Joseph D'Hippolito
September 12, 2006 8:28 PM

Well, Rod, among the issues is whether a popular and respected Catholic blogger (i.e., Shea) has any credibility when it comes to his opinions on the War on Terror. Among that blogger's positions is the following:

1. The torture of captured combatants is more important than the willful murder of the innocent through terror (given the amount of time and passion that the blogger in question has spent on the respective issues).

2. JPII's interpretation of "just war" theory as applied to Iraq would have spared the United States much misery (while ignoring the fact that JPII's interpretation on "just war" as applied to Iraq would have kept a sadistic tyrant in power, a tyrant that likely would have aided Hezbollah in its attack on Israel and has been known to support terrorism elsewhere)

Of course, the blogger's position also conveniently ignores these facts:

-- JPII also opposed the 1990-91 Iraq war that was designed to extricate Saddam from Kuwait -- a war that had U.N. support. Had the world listened to the late pope, Kuwait would be an Iraqi province now, and Saddam would be emboldened to commit more aggression.

-- Much of Vatican diplomatic policy toward the Middle East is designed to protect Arab Christians at all costs, even at the cost of appeasing Arab dictators, as was the case under JPII. It also allows anti-Israel (and anti-Semitic) forces within the Vatican to express themselves.

3. The blogger in question disregards (even mocks) the idea that the religion sponsoring much of the terror in the world is radically totalitarian -- despite the fact that the religion's scripture demands that its adherents adopt warfare as a divine duty to bring the world by force under the influence of this religion.

4. The blogger in question routinely and with approval links to sources (Buchanan, Sobran) whose views toward Israel and toward Jews are, to put it politely, questionable.

I know that the blogger in question is your friend, Rod. But don't let friendship blind you to the truth about his ignorance concerning geopolitical matters.>

dovid
September 13, 2006 10:36 PM

"Wow. What about Nixon?"

Funny you should mention him. Recently I find myself saying, "Nixon wasn't so bad, was he? Reagan wasn't so dumb, was he?".

I guess everything is relative...>

Anonymous
November 9, 2006 9:11 PM

Funny that you mention my uncle, John, in your story. I'm glad so many people remember him when he could not remember his own family and made it hard for us to even have a memory of him. Isn't it nice that he could take people from half his family on trips to Europe, but when he called his own side of the family, if he called, he announced himself as Mr. John Rigo wishing to speak with Mr. or Mrs. ____ and couldn't even say hello to his other nieces or nephews. It helps to know that someone remembers the more upbeat side of him.>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.