I suspect I'll post less on 9/11 than I otherwise might have. I had to turn off ABC's excellent "Path to 9/11" miniseries tonight, because I was so filled with anger and emotion just watching it that I didn't know...
Rod, I have a similar feeling each time I cross over the NJ parkway bridge over the rartain (I don't know the name of the bridge we just call it the big bridge). From this tall bridge I would always look to my right as I sat in the back seat and try to be the first to spot the towers. That was when I was one of seven kids in the back seat of our station wagon. Years past and each and every time I crossed the bridge I'd look to my right, out of habit searching and finding those towers in the distance was comforting, everything was ok ,nothing changes they were standing in the distance tall and majestic. What an empty feeling I have now as I drive across, looking over and not seeing them. It was especially heart wrenching right after 9-11 and still is today five years on. I think living in the shadow on NYC makes it more real, more part of our lives. Tomorrow there will be special Masses said throughout the area. In my parish there were a number of people killed. These people were neighbors, not just someone you didn't know, fellow parishioners whom you greeted at the sign of peace. We here are reminded each day of what happened. I can still vividly recall the emotions that day, that week and the weeks that followed. Reading others remembrances of those days brings tears to my eyes. Thank you for sharing, thanks to Peggy Noonan for sharing and thanks to all those who share and remember. When we begin to forget we must be reminded.>
Reader John
September 11, 2006 1:11 PM
Rod: There's a lot of good insight in this posting. How many of us keep doing things - harmless things, granted - that nevertheless edge out truly important things or disrupt all semblance of spiritual equilibrium? I periodically recognize, for instance, that I really (no offense) should spend less time reading blogs and internet syndicated columns. I have a shelf full of unread books, many of them the sorts of old books C.S. Lewis commended as an antidote to the invisible common modern mindset; so why do I spend time on things even more ephemeral than new *books*? You have the burden of some professional responsibility to "keep up with things." But if you can, take your own advice and stay away from the 9/11 coverage if it makes you so angry. Read the Gospel of John or something.>
watsy
September 11, 2006 2:52 PM
I'm sorry for your pain, Rod. I'm sure that there are many people in NYC who have a similar reaction at this time of year. I don't know if you have PTSD, but it sounds like you could be helped by a caring professional(as opposed to the one that you tried). It makes me wonder if there are support groups that are still getting together in NYC to discuss this. Sometimes talking about this over and over and over again with people who've experienced the same trauma is very helpful.
I was in Plano, Tx on 9/11. I turned on the tv after the towers had fallen. It was much later in the day when it finally registered in my brain that the towers had fallen.
Don't let people who lack empathy bother you, Rod. Usually, they have other issues that you couldn't know anything about that's feeding the hatred.>
Eric Weiss
September 11, 2006 3:25 PM
Rod:
You wrote:
For some reason, I have to watch everything about 9/11 that's ever on. I have to look at every picture. I think all the time about what it was like to be in those towers when they started to fall. Sometimes, even now, I fall asleep thinking about everything that happened on that day. I can't decide if that's a matter of keeping faith, or a matter of being trapped.
To this day my father won't talk about his WWII experiences - to my mom, his kids, or to anyone, as far as I know. All I can guess is that something, or some things, traumatic happened. It apparently made him an atheist (though I suspect his Judaism going into the war was more cultural and intellectual than spiritual). He had the usual collection of WWII books - THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH, etc. - but it was never an obsession with him. Yet I sense it scarred and changed him in ways similar to what you describe, ways which neither I nor my siblings will probably ever know, as he'll likely take it all to the grave. AFAIK, counseling was never an option he sought. So I guess he dealt with it as most people do, shutting off a part of his emotions - with, of course, negative effects in other areas of his life.
I have been spared traumatic experiences, and cannot conceive of the burden and agony it must be to you, and likely was (and maybe still is) for my father. Your column today gives me some understanding, though, of what such a thing can do to a person.
The word "horror" may be the only way to describe some things.
I'll try to remember to pray for you.>
David J. White
September 11, 2006 3:31 PM
I was working in Cleveland. I got an e-mail from a friend of mine in Manhattan, a mass e-mail sent to all of her friends, saying, "Don't worry, I'm all right!" I wrote back saying, "What do you mean, 'don't worry, you're all right'?" She quickly wrote back, "For goodness' sake, turn on the news! If I told you, you wouldn't believe me!"
***
In the traditional Catholic calendar, tomorrow, Sept. 12, is the Feast of the Holy Name of Mary, instituted to commemorate the victory of Jan Sobieski, the king of Poland, over the Turks, outside Vienna in 1683. This turned back the Muslim advance into central and eastern Europe. (The other great Christian victory over the Muslims in early modern times, the naval battle of Lepanto in 1571, is commemorate by the Feast of the Holy Rosary, Oct. 7.)>
Laura A
September 11, 2006 3:33 PM
I think Reader John has a point about staying away from September 11 coverage as much as possible. It's like picking a scab. I don't watch much TV to begin with, but this morning, I'm staying away from the NY Times as well.
Five years ago, the surprise of the attacks and the anthrax scare following them propelled me into something of a constant adrenaline state, and I got hooked on internet news for months. Finally I realized that it was only making things worse and went back to cursory headline reading with only a couple of in-depth stories per day. The important things will get through. I understand that you don't have this option to the degree I do, Rod, but perhaps today you could take it to the maximum degree allowable?
It's not like anyone who was around any of those places five years ago is in any danger of forgetting what happened. Even the weather reminds us.
May God grant you healing and peace.>
Franklin Evans
September 11, 2006 3:49 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/
"Anger management" is such a worn out term, that I even hesitate to use it in quotation marks, but it's mundane meaning is apropos here.
For all we (especially I) criticize our government for their handling of many things related to 9/11 and its aftermath, one thing needs to be remembered and understood: our leaders are human, too, and subject to the same reactions we are having. It is not reasonable to hold them to a higher standard, except in that they should be prepared to pause and reflect before acting, but it behooves us to acknowledge that the people on duty, from the air traffic controllers right up to the President, all got angry. Don't fault them for that, or use it to denigrate their actions. For all that hindsight shows us they could have done better, I at least have no trouble seeing that they did try to do their best.
So, with only empathy intended: Rod, welcome to the human race. You are not alone, and if you still feel the need there are plenty of professionals out there who don't have their heads stuck up their arses like the one you described. And I agree, you should have reported him regardless.
As for me, solely on a personal basis, WTC, the Pentagon and flight 93 go on my avoidance list right after the Holocaust. I don't need to be reminded; I am incapable of forgetting.>
Alicia
September 11, 2006 3:58 PM
Rod,
I don't have time for a long response to your moving post, but I just want to say that I share your rage at what happened on 9/11.
For several years, I've been reading and studying and writing nearly obsessively, trying to understand what it was that happened on that day, to come to terms with the hatred that I felt as a result.
I realize that my rage probably has some personal components that don't relate to the terrorist attacks, but I also feel that something in that anger is healthy, and that I might be able to use the energy from that anger to do something healthy and constructive.
The effort to understand also seems fundamentally healthy and not fruitless. However, I don't feel that all aspects of my anger are positive for me, so I do try and find ways to "rest" from my anger. (Your story about the therapist left me so appalled that I don't think I can comment except to say that this man had no business working as a psychotherapist!)
Take care, and keep posting!>
Alicia
September 11, 2006 4:01 PM
One last thing -- I've been grinding my teeth since 9/11, too. Ouch!>
Karen LH
September 11, 2006 4:03 PM
My husband was working for a little engineering startup company in DC at the time, and one of the guys who worked there was on the plane that hit the Pentagon, along with his family. A couple of people knew that Charles was supposed to be on the flight, but couldn't say anything the first day, until it was confirmed.
The Washington Post ran individual obituaries of the people who died on 9/11, and all I did for days was read these. It was the only way I could process what had happened. Because the crashes were some distance from us, and because the whole thing was so big, I just couldn't get my head around it. It didn't feel real until I read about the victims of the day one at a time.>
Rod Dreher
September 11, 2006 4:40 PM
I forgot to mention that I was a New York Post columnist at the time of the attacks. Our office was hit with an anthrax attack that fall. One of my co-workers, Joanna Huden, was the first infected on our staff. She was the secretary to the editorial page editor. The anthrax-filled envelope sat under a pile of letters for a few days, unnoticed. After we knew what it was, it was pretty startling to reflect on how I would lean over that pile of letters, talking to Joanna, breathing the air over that letter, not even 12 inches under my nose.
I got a cold or a cough or something that week, and the doctor put me on Cipro, just in case. Scary times, they were.>
Joey
September 11, 2006 4:54 PM
Of course we need to take this day to remember the thousands who died that day. However, Rod's post---aside from explaining why he probably won't be posting much today---also is important to remind us of the pain that the attacks that day made. He's not claiming some unique pain that's deeper than that of a survivor or a relative of one who died; he just told what happened to him and what's happened since 9/11.
Anyway, God bless everyone this day, and I hope we all can feel better this miserable day.>
watsy
September 11, 2006 5:08 PM
This is what I'd like to discuss. Not to bring up controversy, but I noticed that Rod described ABC's mini-series as being "excellent."
It seems like it might be a little biased. Does blame Clinton and written by a conservative = "excellent.">
David J. White
September 11, 2006 5:18 PM
The only personal connection I have to someone who was killed on 9/11 was that my family physician's son-in-law was on one of the planes; afterwards, my physician decided to retire, to be with his now-widowed daughter and her family.
I also don't know anyone who has served in the military in either Iraq or Afghanistan.
The whole thing is really just a TV show for me. And as time goes on, it bothers me more and more, that I have no real personal connection to any of this.>
JohnT
September 11, 2006 6:01 PM
http://immaculatedirection.blogspot.com/
Among the military and ex-military men and women with whom I was working that day, I saw only courage and resolve.>
Just hours after Sept. 11, Jeffrey Endean of the Morris County, N.J., Sheriff s Office plunged himself into the nightmare of ground zero. Endean rushed to the still-burning ruins, volunteering to search for survivors and counsel emergency workers. He worked there for two months on nights and weekends, without ever wearing a mask. The EPA said the air was safe, he said. That was all the talk it was just dust. Today, Endean s lungs, larynx, and vocal cords are all scarred from a cocktail of atmospheric toxins dioxin, lead, asbestos, and pulverized glass. His asthma is so bad that he awakens most mornings gasping for breath. Thanks to a weakened immune system, he has rheumatoid arthritis and can barely turn a wrench.
Endean is one of thousands of uncounted casualties of 9/11. A new study by Mount Sinai Medical Center has found that about 70 percent of ground zero workers have serious respiratory problems caused or worsened by inhaling the poisoned air at the site. Even as they worked in the dust and the fumes, many had concerns about what they were breathing. But the Environmental Protection Agency blithely insisted that the air was fine. If people didn t return to downtown Manhattan, of course, Wall Street would remain closed, and the economic damage would be severe. So Wall Street reopened, and the apocalyptic mound of smoldering debris that was once the World Trade Center was quickly cleared. But a small army of selfless laborers are now paying the price with their health; some have died. The government let them down just as surely as it did when it ignored warnings that Muslim men with foreign citizenships were learning how to fly commercial jets.
Thomas Vinciguerra Deputy editor ----->
T.G. Scott
September 11, 2006 6:13 PM
Rod, I have not by far forgotten 9/11, and like you, I have trouble re-watching anything pertaining to it, especially the coverage of either the burning towers or the Pentagon. I'm also not leaving out that scorched place in the Pennsylvania field. I chose to pass the time quietly last evening catching up on my college coursework after hanging our flag from the front porch. It will come down at nightfall inasmuch as I want all passersby to understand that today is only what it's for. I'm always proud to be an American and fly our flag for the appropriate times, but I wanted to honor the memory of those who died so tragically on this day 5 years ago in my own quiet way.>
Mark Shea
September 11, 2006 6:38 PM
http://www.markshea.blogspot.com
Rod:
My condolences to you and the thousands of other New Yorkers who had to endure that day. The dead are at peace. The living have to carry the sight, the sound, the smells of that horror with them. God can change even that to glory. St. John is the witness to that. He saw the crucifixion with his own eyes, yet lived to regard that moment as Jesus' glorious exaltation and "lifting up". If God can heal that trauma, he can heal yours.>
Anonymous
September 11, 2006 6:54 PM
September 11 is August 29 on the traditional Church Calendar which is the "feast" of St. John the Baptist (the scare quotes are because his death was such a horror that the Church commemorates it with a strict fast). Orthodox Christians around the world were in church five years ago - and when it was announced, as it was in many places at the end of the Liturgy of the Word, that the Towers had fallen and the Pentagon had been hit, the people stayed and prayed.
The Russian Orthodox Cathedral in DC is dedicated to St. John the Baptist so today is their patronal feast day. A friend of mine is a reader ('Psalte') there and he was chanting when he realized something must have happened because of the stir in the people around him. As a retired Army warrant officer with many friends in the Pentagon, he prayed - and stayed. Where else to be but with God Himself in the Eucharist, praying for those departed and those in agony?
Is there a meaningful connection between the events of 29 August/11 September and the Beheading of St. John the Forerunner? Not in the minds of the terrorists, I'm sure. But what the Church experiences as a feast/fast day in which we celebrate the greatness of the victory of the greatest of the Prophets while acknowledging the agony and injustice of his demise has a parallel in the day and how America remembers it, a tragedy graced by courage, sacrifice, and love.
John>
BrentEubanks
September 11, 2006 7:30 PM
http://a-steep-hill.livejournal.com/profile
As long as we are remembering past tragedies and dead heros, let us not forget the heroes who are still alive, and suffering the price of their heroism, and being ignored by the Powers That Be.
Lawmakers Say Ground Zero Workers Unsafe Lawmakers said federal officials failed to protect ground zero workers as they clambered over the smoking pile of toxic debris and have not properly cared for them in the years since.
The deceptive and inaccurate statements made by the EPA and others immediately after 9/11 could perhaps be excused as "doing the best they could under stress with limitted information". But the persistent refusal of the Administration to step up and take responsibility for the care of these people who so willinging put themselves in harms way for their fellow Americans... Well, I think it speaks for itself.>
Joseph D'Hippolito
September 11, 2006 7:52 PM
Mark, you would do well to remember the nature of the enemy we fight, instead of making excuses for it and for the Pat Buchanans of the world on your pathetic blog...>
Joseph D'Hippolito
September 11, 2006 7:56 PM
Rod, like you, I intend to avoid all mention of 9/11 on this day. Like others who have posted, I don't need to be reminded; the anger is too fresh. It will probably always be too fresh.
In my case, those events led to a near-nervous breakdown. I can remember a week after crying uncontrollably.
We -- those of us on this blog and in the nation as a whole -- should focus our anger on the appropriate parties: the barbarian bastards who intend to impose their caliphate on the world and the allegedly legitimate authority in that so-called religion who do nothing when confronted with such barbarism. The West will not be safe until those bastards -- and their collaborators within Islam, the Catholic Church and elsewhere -- are destroyed.>
Jennifer
September 11, 2006 8:05 PM
It seems like the off topic responses are gone so perhaps we can now have a mature conversation.
I completely understand the anger. I also think that people who were in NYC or DC that day can't really understand it. I was living in Brooklyn Heights and I'll never forget talking to strangers on the street. Something that never happens in NYC. The fear is something that I haven't quite come to terms with.>
Rod Dreher
September 11, 2006 8:16 PM
Jennifer, I remember stopping on the way to the Bklyn Bridge that morning, stopping there at that pay phone at the corner of Henry and Montague. I wanted to call Julie and tell her that I thought it might be a good idea to cancel her doctor's appointment in Manhattan. The cell phones were down, so I had to wait in a short line to call her. There was a woman in front of me using the phone. She was dazed. When she hung up, she said to no one in particular, "I was supposed to be there. I work there. I was late today because my son kept crying, and wouldn't let me leave on time." She muttered something about how she had been mad at him for making such a fuss, but because he made her late, he probably saved her life.
Then she wandered off.
I bet there are a lot of stories like that woman's.
Jennifer, if you can and if you feel so moved, stop by Our Lady of Lebanon and meet Msgr Ignace Sadek. What a wonderful man he is. A fellow parishioner of mine there said that he saw Msgr Sadek standing on the Promenade, with his arms up in prayer as the white dust cloud from the collapsed south tower made its way across the river towards Brooklyn. Nobody knew what was in that dust cloud, but Msgr Sadek did not run away from it. He stood there in it praying. My friend saw strangers running up to the elderly priest, falling on their knees and begging for absolution. We really did think this might be the end of the world, didn't we? Or at least our world. Which it was.>
Susan
September 11, 2006 8:19 PM
"The fear is something that I haven't quite come to terms with."
I watched the plane go over my head and crash into the Pentagon. Everytime I hear a lot of sirens, I wonder whether another plane has hit the Pentagon. I always have my cellphone in my pocket when I fly on an airplane.
I have a lot of anger, and much of it is about the government and the willing enablers who have allowed the government to use 9/11 to torture and spy and begin a war in Iraq.>
watsy
September 11, 2006 8:57 PM
I've had a lot of anger. I became a little angry the day that I realized that I was duped. I don't remember the exact day, but it was around the time that I read Ron Suskind's book, "The Price of Loyalty." It got worse after reading Clark's book, "Against All Enemies." You see, history had a way of showing that they were speaking the truth.
I became angrier after the election when the evangelicals declared themselves to be "the moral voters." I still can't quite believe the irony that the most moral voters would elect the most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history.
Now, I'm getting angry. I don't get angry at terrorists. I don't have any expectations of goodness and critical thinking from them. I guess when you have no expectations, you can't be disappointed.
But I have hope that we'll all learn from this and start to hold our politicians to a higher level of accountability.>
JohnT
September 11, 2006 9:21 PM
http://immaculatedirection.blogspot.com/
Rod
I ve been watching the debate between you and your critics since it begin in April. It saddens me since it is an internal one, and does not need to come to written blows. Your personalization of this event is reasonable and normal. You are setting the debate for the post by sharing your feelings. For now, it is our generation s infamous day so it is okay to personalize a bit.
For me it was a day of character and courage. Not mine, but the others around me. The retired military who contemplated ways to once again serve. The reservists who knew at that moment they and their families would soon be called to a deeper sacrifice. The current military who steeled themselves against fear in order to stand against the enemy. All these people with whom I worked that day wanted to give more than they could at that moment.
I suspect when you write about these events in the first person, some people interpret that as narcissistic, but others interpret it as your attempt to identify with the victims and their families. By sharing our emotions with others, especially to the victims families, it is a way to convey our support for them in their suffering. It says to them that we may not carry the burden, but we grieve for you and your loss, and in your weakness we will be strong.
For all of you who persist in rage and anger over 9-11, it is justified to some extent, but please consider that your anger may be your reaction to fear. On-going fear is a debilitating emotion that leads to hopelessness and despair. We have the Holy Spirit within us, and we have each other. You can never be alone, so let go of the anger and be at peace. When you feel the anger recollect yourself, and walk with Our Lady along the Via Dolorosa. It will pass.>
Kathleen
September 11, 2006 9:35 PM
Rod:
I had a huge headache after watching that show last night as well.
I'm almost as angry at that therapist who said what he did to you.
God bless you.>
Susan
September 11, 2006 9:49 PM
"When you feel the anger recollect yourself, and walk with Our Lady along the Via Dolorosa. It will pass."
Actually, I don't think my God and Holy Spirit wants anger to pass, especially when anger leads us into action. Anger, channeled through faith, can be a powerful tool. We shouldn't let it be washed away.>
Scott
September 11, 2006 9:55 PM
I walked out this morning and thought, how peculiar, the weather is exactly as it was 5 years ago. The almost cloudless sky, the cool breeze - and it made me shake. The only thing missing was that I was home and not there.
Rod, you go to bed imagining what it would have been like to be there. I wake up in the middle of the night, not breathing, remembering what I saw.
I even remember 3 weeks later, in the Fulton Street station, the smell of bleach that had been poured all of the station. It didn't cover the smell of rotting bodies.
Be happy that you can work. I don't think I'll ever work again. I have to take a cocktail of four drugs just so I can walk out of the house. I cannot go back to Manhattan. The fear grabs me and doesn't let go. I can't even get on a train after Madrid.
My TV is off today.
I wonder when the next one will come and how I'll go.
Except I think part of me died 5 years ago and is just waiting for the rest of me to catch up.>
Rod Dreher
September 11, 2006 10:25 PM
God love you, Scott. I can't imagine. They opened up downtown to reporters and workers six days after 9/11, and I went down there with my press pass to look around. As anybody who actually saw the site knows, nothing on TV could prepare you for it. That was the thing -- the immensity of the destruction. That such a unbelievable amount of destruction could be carried out in such a short period of time, without warning, and so easily. To stand there on the lip of that crater and try to take it all in was almost an act of metaphysical despair. Everything you thought you knew about the fabric of reality turns out to be false.
Of course, that's an American speaking. As a friend of mine, an immigrant from China, put it, on that day her immigrant illusions about America as a fortress untouched by the kind of history that the rest of the world lives with collapsed. My friend, a Christian convert, said she also learned that it was futile to put any trust in the things of men, and instead focus on "the only permanent thing," which is God.>
JohnT
September 11, 2006 10:48 PM
http://immaculatedirection.blogspot.com/
Susan
Actually, I don't think my God and Holy Spirit wants anger to pass . . .
If you mean by turning your anger to something else, I do agree. However, I think that being detached is more important. We want to let go of our base anger and fear. You can still have passion and urgency in your work, but it is not driven by anger and fear. Anger and fear will eventually lead to a revenge mentality. I suspect that you mean righteous anger.
When you say my God and Holy Spirit who is that God?>
FzxGkJssFrk
September 11, 2006 10:58 PM
http://physicsgeekjesusfreak.blogspot.com
Thanks for sharing your experience on this, Rod. I had just ended college in New Jersey and started graduate school in Tennessee when it happened, but my sister was on Staten Island at Wagner College. She heard the plane hit the tower while she was walking to her office and at first thought that a truck had dropped a dumpster outside. She and her coworkers watched the Towers fall, from across the harbor.
I can only imagine what it must have been like for you and Scott. I know that even halfway across the country, I was in a blind rage for three or four days until I realized that, subconsciously, I was fully prepared to beat the living crap out of the next Muslim I encountered. That scared me.>
Rod Dreher
September 11, 2006 11:23 PM
I think I better understand the power of forgiveness, as well as its difficulty, since 9/11. It's hard to let go of anger, because in some sense you feel that you are betraying your loved ones, or those that were done wrong, by forgiving -- or at least distancing yourself from the intensity of the anger. Yet if we don't do that, we remain a prisoner of our own anger. I watched "Lawrence of Arabia" yesterday, and the film touches on how the institution of the tribal blood feud among the Arabs keeps them from accomplishing anything. (This is not fiction: read David Pryce-Jones on the shame/honor cultural dynamic; it's the same in the Balkans).
Ultimately, you have to have some mechanism for letting go of the desire for revenge, and doing so with honor. As a sociological matter, the Christian religion offers that by esteeming and sanctifying the act of forgiveness.>
Mark Shea
September 11, 2006 11:42 PM
http://www.markshea.blogspot.com
It's hard to let go of anger, because in some sense you feel that you are betraying your loved ones, or those that were done wrong, by forgiving
I suspect this is not small part of the reason Jesus tells us that we have to hate father, mother, and our own lives if we are to follow him. It's a hard saying. One of the hardest, yet like all the hard saying of Jesus, we find that it is unexpectedly freeing if we bite the bullet and do it. We find that forgiving is not excusing, nor is it somehow spitting in the eye of victims. It is, simply, handing one who has done us real evil over to the mercy of God and giving up our completely futile attempt to make them pay by chewing the cud of our own rage. It frees us to love those who have suffered and it frees us from the power of evil men to continue dominating our lives long after they are dead.>
cs
September 12, 2006 12:19 AM
9/11 was a turning point for most of us in many ways. The loss of thousands of lives led to national grief and solidarity. We need to honor the event appropriately.
However, historical context is often lost. Many of us cannot contemplate the thousands of lives lost at Pearl Harbor, and certainly not at Gettysburg or during the battles of the Revolutionary War. Some even post that this is the
"most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history."
Wow. What about Nixon? "Maybe" we could examine the other 40-something administrations and find some pretty shocking things.
(Note- not saying the current administration is perfect, or even close. Just saying the hyperbole is rather extreme.)
Back on the topic of 9/11, my prayer is that those who were touched by loss on that day will find peace and healing. May we be protected from such a drastic loss of life in the future.>
David J. White
September 12, 2006 12:30 AM
"most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history."
Wow. What about Nixon? "Maybe" we could examine the other 40-something administrations and find some pretty shocking things.
(Note- not saying the current administration is perfect, or even close. Just saying the hyperbole is rather extreme.)
I've thought that one might have to go back to Harding's or even Grant's administration to find the same level of sheer shameless, unembarrassed self-interestedness.>
Eric Weiss
September 12, 2006 3:18 AM
"most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history."
Wow. What about Nixon? "Maybe" we could examine the other 40-something administrations and find some pretty shocking things.
(Note- not saying the current administration is perfect, or even close. Just saying the hyperbole is rather extreme.)
I've thought that one might have to go back to Harding's or even Grant's administration to find the same level of sheer shameless, unembarrassed self-interestedness. David J. White | 09.11.06 - 6:35 pm | #
Nah. National politics can't hold a candle to corruption at the local level. The extent may be smaller when it happens locally, but the corruption is deeper. Presidents have a long way to go before they rise (or sink) to the level of police departments, mayors and governors. :^)>
Joseph D'Hippolito
September 12, 2006 6:41 AM
We find that forgiving is not excusing, nor is it somehow spitting in the eye of victims. It is, simply, handing one who has done us real evil over to the mercy of God and giving up our completely futile attempt to make them pay by chewing the cud of our own rage. It frees us to love those who have suffered and it frees us from the power of evil men to continue dominating our lives long after they are dead.
Mark, would that you take your own words to heart. If you did, perhaps you would stop engaging in unprovoked personal attacks on those who disagree, let alone obsess about them. Perhaps you would stop deliberately distoring their position. Perhaps you would stop responding to legitimate points with vicious sarcasm and venal vindictiveness.
Don't tell me that you don't know what I'm talking about. You know very well what I'm talking about.
And don't tell me that you forgive me or have forgiven me. If you did, then you wouldn't engage in the above behavior, would you?
Besides, we as Christians have greater responsibilities than being freed from the power of evil men to control us. We have the responsibility to defend the innocent from such evil me. We have the responsibility to defend society from them. Unfortunately, sometimes we have to use nasty and untidy means to do so (see WWII).
Then again, like most Catholic bloggers, you've never let such mundane things as reality and behavioral consistency interfere with your fleshly desire to spin webs of esoteric, etherial rhetoric -- and to trap those you don't like in them.>
Rod Dreher
September 12, 2006 3:21 PM
Joe, please don't bring your personal dispute with Mark to this site. I'm trying hard to get the personal attacks etc. out of this forum, so we can concentrate on discussing and arguing on issues and positions.>
Joseph D'Hippolito
September 12, 2006 8:28 PM
Well, Rod, among the issues is whether a popular and respected Catholic blogger (i.e., Shea) has any credibility when it comes to his opinions on the War on Terror. Among that blogger's positions is the following:
1. The torture of captured combatants is more important than the willful murder of the innocent through terror (given the amount of time and passion that the blogger in question has spent on the respective issues).
2. JPII's interpretation of "just war" theory as applied to Iraq would have spared the United States much misery (while ignoring the fact that JPII's interpretation on "just war" as applied to Iraq would have kept a sadistic tyrant in power, a tyrant that likely would have aided Hezbollah in its attack on Israel and has been known to support terrorism elsewhere)
Of course, the blogger's position also conveniently ignores these facts:
-- JPII also opposed the 1990-91 Iraq war that was designed to extricate Saddam from Kuwait -- a war that had U.N. support. Had the world listened to the late pope, Kuwait would be an Iraqi province now, and Saddam would be emboldened to commit more aggression.
-- Much of Vatican diplomatic policy toward the Middle East is designed to protect Arab Christians at all costs, even at the cost of appeasing Arab dictators, as was the case under JPII. It also allows anti-Israel (and anti-Semitic) forces within the Vatican to express themselves.
3. The blogger in question disregards (even mocks) the idea that the religion sponsoring much of the terror in the world is radically totalitarian -- despite the fact that the religion's scripture demands that its adherents adopt warfare as a divine duty to bring the world by force under the influence of this religion.
4. The blogger in question routinely and with approval links to sources (Buchanan, Sobran) whose views toward Israel and toward Jews are, to put it politely, questionable.
I know that the blogger in question is your friend, Rod. But don't let friendship blind you to the truth about his ignorance concerning geopolitical matters.>
dovid
September 13, 2006 10:36 PM
"Wow. What about Nixon?"
Funny you should mention him. Recently I find myself saying, "Nixon wasn't so bad, was he? Reagan wasn't so dumb, was he?".
I guess everything is relative...>
Anonymous
November 9, 2006 9:11 PM
Funny that you mention my uncle, John, in your story. I'm glad so many people remember him when he could not remember his own family and made it hard for us to even have a memory of him. Isn't it nice that he could take people from half his family on trips to Europe, but when he called his own side of the family, if he called, he announced himself as Mr. John Rigo wishing to speak with Mr. or Mrs. ____ and couldn't even say hello to his other nieces or nephews. It helps to know that someone remembers the more upbeat side of him.>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
Rod,
I have a similar feeling each time I cross over the NJ parkway bridge over the rartain (I don't know the name of the bridge we just call it the big bridge). From this tall bridge I would always look to my right as I sat in the back seat and try to be the first to spot the towers. That was when I was one of seven kids in the back seat of our station wagon. Years past and each and every time I crossed the bridge I'd look to my right, out of habit searching and finding those towers in the distance was comforting, everything was ok ,nothing changes they were standing in the distance tall and majestic. What an empty feeling I have now as I drive across, looking over and not seeing them. It was especially heart wrenching right after 9-11 and still is today five years on. I think living in the shadow on NYC makes it more real, more part of our lives. Tomorrow there will be special Masses said throughout the area. In my parish there were a number of people killed. These people were neighbors, not just someone you didn't know, fellow parishioners whom you greeted at the sign of peace. We here are reminded each day of what happened. I can still vividly recall the emotions that day, that week and the weeks that followed. Reading others remembrances of those days brings tears to my eyes. Thank you for sharing, thanks to Peggy Noonan for sharing and thanks to all those who share and remember. When we begin to forget we must be reminded.>
Rod:
There's a lot of good insight in this posting.
How many of us keep doing things - harmless things, granted - that nevertheless edge out truly important things or disrupt all semblance of spiritual equilibrium?
I periodically recognize, for instance, that I really (no offense) should spend less time reading blogs and internet syndicated columns. I have a shelf full of unread books, many of them the sorts of old books C.S. Lewis commended as an antidote to the invisible common modern mindset; so why do I spend time on things even more ephemeral than new *books*?
You have the burden of some professional responsibility to "keep up with things." But if you can, take your own advice and stay away from the 9/11 coverage if it makes you so angry. Read the Gospel of John or something.>
I'm sorry for your pain, Rod. I'm sure that there are many people in NYC who have a similar reaction at this time of year. I don't know if you have PTSD, but it sounds like you could be helped by a caring professional(as opposed to the one that you tried). It makes me wonder if there are support groups that are still getting together in NYC to discuss this. Sometimes talking about this over and over and over again with people who've experienced the same trauma is very helpful.
I was in Plano, Tx on 9/11. I turned on the tv after the towers had fallen. It was much later in the day when it finally registered in my brain that the towers had fallen.
Don't let people who lack empathy bother you, Rod. Usually, they have other issues that you couldn't know anything about that's feeding the hatred.>
Rod:
You wrote:
For some reason, I have to watch everything about 9/11 that's ever on. I have to look at every picture. I think all the time about what it was like to be in those towers when they started to fall. Sometimes, even now, I fall asleep thinking about everything that happened on that day. I can't decide if that's a matter of keeping faith, or a matter of being trapped.
To this day my father won't talk about his WWII experiences - to my mom, his kids, or to anyone, as far as I know. All I can guess is that something, or some things, traumatic happened. It apparently made him an atheist (though I suspect his Judaism going into the war was more cultural and intellectual than spiritual). He had the usual collection of WWII books - THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH, etc. - but it was never an obsession with him. Yet I sense it scarred and changed him in ways similar to what you describe, ways which neither I nor my siblings will probably ever know, as he'll likely take it all to the grave. AFAIK, counseling was never an option he sought. So I guess he dealt with it as most people do, shutting off a part of his emotions - with, of course, negative effects in other areas of his life.
I have been spared traumatic experiences, and cannot conceive of the burden and agony it must be to you, and likely was (and maybe still is) for my father. Your column today gives me some understanding, though, of what such a thing can do to a person.
The word "horror" may be the only way to describe some things.
I'll try to remember to pray for you.>
I was working in Cleveland. I got an e-mail from a friend of mine in Manhattan, a mass e-mail sent to all of her friends, saying, "Don't worry, I'm all right!" I wrote back saying, "What do you mean, 'don't worry, you're all right'?" She quickly wrote back, "For goodness' sake, turn on the news! If I told you, you wouldn't believe me!"
***
In the traditional Catholic calendar, tomorrow, Sept. 12, is the Feast of the Holy Name of Mary, instituted to commemorate the victory of Jan Sobieski, the king of Poland, over the Turks, outside Vienna in 1683. This turned back the Muslim advance into central and eastern Europe. (The other great Christian victory over the Muslims in early modern times, the naval battle of Lepanto in 1571, is commemorate by the Feast of the Holy Rosary, Oct. 7.)>
I think Reader John has a point about staying away from September 11 coverage as much as possible. It's like picking a scab. I don't watch much TV to begin with, but this morning, I'm staying away from the NY Times as well.
Five years ago, the surprise of the attacks and the anthrax scare following them propelled me into something of a constant adrenaline state, and I got hooked on internet news for months. Finally I realized that it was only making things worse and went back to cursory headline reading with only a couple of in-depth stories per day. The important things will get through. I understand that you don't have this option to the degree I do, Rod, but perhaps today you could take it to the maximum degree allowable?
It's not like anyone who was around any of those places five years ago is in any danger of forgetting what happened. Even the weather reminds us.
May God grant you healing and peace.>
"Anger management" is such a worn out term, that I even hesitate to use it in quotation marks, but it's mundane meaning is apropos here.
For all we (especially I) criticize our government for their handling of many things related to 9/11 and its aftermath, one thing needs to be remembered and understood: our leaders are human, too, and subject to the same reactions we are having. It is not reasonable to hold them to a higher standard, except in that they should be prepared to pause and reflect before acting, but it behooves us to acknowledge that the people on duty, from the air traffic controllers right up to the President, all got angry. Don't fault them for that, or use it to denigrate their actions. For all that hindsight shows us they could have done better, I at least have no trouble seeing that they did try to do their best.
So, with only empathy intended: Rod, welcome to the human race. You are not alone, and if you still feel the need there are plenty of professionals out there who don't have their heads stuck up their arses like the one you described. And I agree, you should have reported him regardless.
As for me, solely on a personal basis, WTC, the Pentagon and flight 93 go on my avoidance list right after the Holocaust. I don't need to be reminded; I am incapable of forgetting.>
Rod,
I don't have time for a long response to your moving post, but I just want to say that I share your rage at what happened on 9/11.
For several years, I've been reading and studying and writing nearly obsessively, trying to understand what it was that happened on that day, to come to terms with the hatred that I felt as a result.
I realize that my rage probably has some personal components that don't relate to the terrorist attacks, but I also feel that something in that anger is healthy, and that I might be able to use the energy from that anger to do something healthy and constructive.
The effort to understand also seems fundamentally healthy and not fruitless. However, I don't feel that all aspects of my anger are positive for me, so I do try and find ways to "rest" from my anger. (Your story about the therapist left me so appalled that I don't think I can comment except to say that this man had no business working as a psychotherapist!)
Take care, and keep posting!>
One last thing -- I've been grinding my teeth since 9/11, too. Ouch!>
My husband was working for a little engineering startup company in DC at the time, and one of the guys who worked there was on the plane that hit the Pentagon, along with his family. A couple of people knew that Charles was supposed to be on the flight, but couldn't say anything the first day, until it was confirmed.
The Washington Post ran individual obituaries of the people who died on 9/11, and all I did for days was read these. It was the only way I could process what had happened. Because the crashes were some distance from us, and because the whole thing was so big, I just couldn't get my head around it. It didn't feel real until I read about the victims of the day one at a time.>
I forgot to mention that I was a New York Post columnist at the time of the attacks. Our office was hit with an anthrax attack that fall. One of my co-workers, Joanna Huden, was the first infected on our staff. She was the secretary to the editorial page editor. The anthrax-filled envelope sat under a pile of letters for a few days, unnoticed. After we knew what it was, it was pretty startling to reflect on how I would lean over that pile of letters, talking to Joanna, breathing the air over that letter, not even 12 inches under my nose.
I got a cold or a cough or something that week, and the doctor put me on Cipro, just in case. Scary times, they were.>
Of course we need to take this day to remember the thousands who died that day. However, Rod's post---aside from explaining why he probably won't be posting much today---also is important to remind us of the pain that the attacks that day made. He's not claiming some unique pain that's deeper than that of a survivor or a relative of one who died; he just told what happened to him and what's happened since 9/11.
Anyway, God bless everyone this day, and I hope we all can feel better this miserable day.>
This is what I'd like to discuss. Not to bring up controversy, but I noticed that Rod described ABC's mini-series as being "excellent."
Some people disagree.
http://www.workingforchange.com/activism/action.cfm?itemid=21330&afccode=afchp
It seems like it might be a little biased. Does blame Clinton and written by a conservative = "excellent.">
The only personal connection I have to someone who was killed on 9/11 was that my family physician's son-in-law was on one of the planes; afterwards, my physician decided to retire, to be with his now-widowed daughter and her family.
I also don't know anyone who has served in the military in either Iraq or Afghanistan.
The whole thing is really just a TV show for me. And as time goes on, it bothers me more and more, that I have no real personal connection to any of this.>
Among the military and ex-military men and women with whom I was working that day, I saw only courage and resolve.>
From THE WEEK Magazine:
http://www.theweekmagazine.com/article.aspx?id=1631
The Other Casualties of 9/11
9/8/2006
Just hours after Sept. 11, Jeffrey Endean of the Morris County, N.J., Sheriff s Office plunged himself into the nightmare of ground zero. Endean rushed to the still-burning ruins, volunteering to search for survivors and counsel emergency workers. He worked there for two months on nights and weekends, without ever wearing a mask. The EPA said the air was safe, he said. That was all the talk it was just dust. Today, Endean s lungs, larynx, and vocal cords are all scarred from a cocktail of atmospheric toxins dioxin, lead, asbestos, and pulverized glass. His asthma is so bad that he awakens most mornings gasping for breath. Thanks to a weakened immune system, he has rheumatoid arthritis and can barely turn a wrench.
Endean is one of thousands of uncounted casualties of 9/11. A new study by Mount Sinai Medical Center has found that about 70 percent of ground zero workers have serious respiratory problems caused or worsened by inhaling the poisoned air at the site. Even as they worked in the dust and the fumes, many had concerns about what they were breathing. But the Environmental Protection Agency blithely insisted that the air was fine. If people didn t return to downtown Manhattan, of course, Wall Street would remain closed, and the economic damage would be severe. So Wall Street reopened, and the apocalyptic mound of smoldering debris that was once the World Trade Center was quickly cleared. But a small army of selfless laborers are now paying the price with their health; some have died. The government let them down just as surely as it did when it ignored warnings that Muslim men with foreign citizenships were learning how to fly commercial jets.
Thomas Vinciguerra
Deputy editor
----->
Rod, I have not by far forgotten 9/11, and like you, I have trouble re-watching anything pertaining to it, especially the coverage of either the burning towers or the Pentagon. I'm also not leaving out that scorched place in the Pennsylvania field. I chose to pass the time quietly last evening catching up on my college coursework after hanging our flag from the front porch. It will come down at nightfall inasmuch as I want all passersby to understand that today is only what it's for. I'm always proud to be an American and fly our flag for the appropriate times, but I wanted to honor the memory of those who died so tragically on this day 5 years ago in my own quiet way.>
Rod:
My condolences to you and the thousands of other New Yorkers who had to endure that day. The dead are at peace. The living have to carry the sight, the sound, the smells of that horror with them. God can change even that to glory. St. John is the witness to that. He saw the crucifixion with his own eyes, yet lived to regard that moment as Jesus' glorious exaltation and "lifting up". If God can heal that trauma, he can heal yours.>
September 11 is August 29 on the traditional Church Calendar which is the "feast" of St. John the Baptist (the scare quotes are because his death was such a horror that the Church commemorates it with a strict fast). Orthodox Christians around the world were in church five years ago - and when it was announced, as it was in many places at the end of the Liturgy of the Word, that the Towers had fallen and the Pentagon had been hit, the people stayed and prayed.
The Russian Orthodox Cathedral in DC is dedicated to St. John the Baptist so today is their patronal feast day. A friend of mine is a reader ('Psalte') there and he was chanting when he realized something must have happened because of the stir in the people around him. As a retired Army warrant officer with many friends in the Pentagon, he prayed - and stayed. Where else to be but with God Himself in the Eucharist, praying for those departed and those in agony?
Is there a meaningful connection between the events of 29 August/11 September and the Beheading of St. John the Forerunner? Not in the minds of the terrorists, I'm sure. But what the Church experiences as a feast/fast day in which we celebrate the greatness of the victory of the greatest of the Prophets while acknowledging the agony and injustice of his demise has a parallel in the day and how America remembers it, a tragedy graced by courage, sacrifice, and love.
John>
As long as we are remembering past tragedies and dead heros, let us not forget the heroes who are still alive, and suffering the price of their heroism, and being ignored by the Powers That Be.
Lawmakers Say Ground Zero Workers Unsafe
Lawmakers said federal officials failed to protect ground zero workers as they clambered over the smoking pile of toxic debris and have not properly cared for them in the years since.
EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution
70% of Ground Zero workers have major health problems
The deceptive and inaccurate statements made by the EPA and others immediately after 9/11 could perhaps be excused as "doing the best they could under stress with limitted information". But the persistent refusal of the Administration to step up and take responsibility for the care of these people who so willinging put themselves in harms way for their fellow Americans... Well, I think it speaks for itself.>
Mark, you would do well to remember the nature of the enemy we fight, instead of making excuses for it and for the Pat Buchanans of the world on your pathetic blog...>
Rod, like you, I intend to avoid all mention of 9/11 on this day. Like others who have posted, I don't need to be reminded; the anger is too fresh. It will probably always be too fresh.
In my case, those events led to a near-nervous breakdown. I can remember a week after crying uncontrollably.
We -- those of us on this blog and in the nation as a whole -- should focus our anger on the appropriate parties: the barbarian bastards who intend to impose their caliphate on the world and the allegedly legitimate authority in that so-called religion who do nothing when confronted with such barbarism. The West will not be safe until those bastards -- and their collaborators within Islam, the Catholic Church and elsewhere -- are destroyed.>
It seems like the off topic responses are gone so perhaps we can now have a mature conversation.
I completely understand the anger. I also think that people who were in NYC or DC that day can't really understand it. I was living in Brooklyn Heights and I'll never forget talking to strangers on the street. Something that never happens in NYC. The fear is something that I haven't quite come to terms with.>
Jennifer, I remember stopping on the way to the Bklyn Bridge that morning, stopping there at that pay phone at the corner of Henry and Montague. I wanted to call Julie and tell her that I thought it might be a good idea to cancel her doctor's appointment in Manhattan. The cell phones were down, so I had to wait in a short line to call her. There was a woman in front of me using the phone. She was dazed. When she hung up, she said to no one in particular, "I was supposed to be there. I work there. I was late today because my son kept crying, and wouldn't let me leave on time." She muttered something about how she had been mad at him for making such a fuss, but because he made her late, he probably saved her life.
Then she wandered off.
I bet there are a lot of stories like that woman's.
Jennifer, if you can and if you feel so moved, stop by Our Lady of Lebanon and meet Msgr Ignace Sadek. What a wonderful man he is. A fellow parishioner of mine there said that he saw Msgr Sadek standing on the Promenade, with his arms up in prayer as the white dust cloud from the collapsed south tower made its way across the river towards Brooklyn. Nobody knew what was in that dust cloud, but Msgr Sadek did not run away from it. He stood there in it praying. My friend saw strangers running up to the elderly priest, falling on their knees and begging for absolution. We really did think this might be the end of the world, didn't we? Or at least our world. Which it was.>
"The fear is something that I haven't quite come to terms with."
I watched the plane go over my head and crash into the Pentagon. Everytime I hear a lot of sirens, I wonder whether another plane has hit the Pentagon. I always have my cellphone in my pocket when I fly on an airplane.
I have a lot of anger, and much of it is about the government and the willing enablers who have allowed the government to use 9/11 to torture and spy and begin a war in Iraq.>
I've had a lot of anger. I became a little angry the day that I realized that I was duped. I don't remember the exact day, but it was around the time that I read Ron Suskind's book, "The Price of Loyalty." It got worse after reading Clark's book, "Against All Enemies." You see, history had a way of showing that they were speaking the truth.
I became angrier after the election when the evangelicals declared themselves to be "the moral voters." I still can't quite believe the irony that the most moral voters would elect the most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history.
Now, I'm getting angry. I don't get angry at terrorists. I don't have any expectations of goodness and critical thinking from them. I guess when you have no expectations, you can't be disappointed.
But I have hope that we'll all learn from this and start to hold our politicians to a higher level of accountability.>
Rod
I ve been watching the debate between you and your critics since it begin in April. It saddens me since it is an internal one, and does not need to come to written blows. Your personalization of this event is reasonable and normal. You are setting the debate for the post by sharing your feelings. For now, it is our generation s infamous day so it is okay to personalize a bit.
For me it was a day of character and courage. Not mine, but the others around me. The retired military who contemplated ways to once again serve. The reservists who knew at that moment they and their families would soon be called to a deeper sacrifice. The current military who steeled themselves against fear in order to stand against the enemy. All these people with whom I worked that day wanted to give more than they could at that moment.
I suspect when you write about these events in the first person, some people interpret that as narcissistic, but others interpret it as your attempt to identify with the victims and their families. By sharing our emotions with others, especially to the victims families, it is a way to convey our support for them in their suffering. It says to them that we may not carry the burden, but we grieve for you and your loss, and in your weakness we will be strong.
For all of you who persist in rage and anger over 9-11, it is justified to some extent, but please consider that your anger may be your reaction to fear. On-going fear is a debilitating emotion that leads to hopelessness and despair. We have the Holy Spirit within us, and we have each other. You can never be alone, so let go of the anger and be at peace. When you feel the anger recollect yourself, and walk with Our Lady along the Via Dolorosa. It will pass.>
Rod:
I had a huge headache after watching that show last night as well.
I'm almost as angry at that therapist who said what he did to you.
God bless you.>
"When you feel the anger recollect yourself, and walk with Our Lady along the Via Dolorosa. It will pass."
Actually, I don't think my God and Holy Spirit wants anger to pass, especially when anger leads us into action. Anger, channeled through faith, can be a powerful tool. We shouldn't let it be washed away.>
I walked out this morning and thought, how peculiar, the weather is exactly as it was 5 years ago. The almost cloudless sky, the cool breeze - and it made me shake. The only thing missing was that I was home and not there.
Rod, you go to bed imagining what it would have been like to be there. I wake up in the middle of the night, not breathing, remembering what I saw.
I even remember 3 weeks later, in the Fulton Street station, the smell of bleach that had been poured all of the station. It didn't cover the smell of rotting bodies.
Be happy that you can work. I don't think I'll ever work again. I have to take a cocktail of four drugs just so I can walk out of the house. I cannot go back to Manhattan. The fear grabs me and doesn't let go. I can't even get on a train after Madrid.
My TV is off today.
I wonder when the next one will come and how I'll go.
Except I think part of me died 5 years ago and is just waiting for the rest of me to catch up.>
God love you, Scott. I can't imagine. They opened up downtown to reporters and workers six days after 9/11, and I went down there with my press pass to look around. As anybody who actually saw the site knows, nothing on TV could prepare you for it. That was the thing -- the immensity of the destruction. That such a unbelievable amount of destruction could be carried out in such a short period of time, without warning, and so easily. To stand there on the lip of that crater and try to take it all in was almost an act of metaphysical despair. Everything you thought you knew about the fabric of reality turns out to be false.
Of course, that's an American speaking. As a friend of mine, an immigrant from China, put it, on that day her immigrant illusions about America as a fortress untouched by the kind of history that the rest of the world lives with collapsed. My friend, a Christian convert, said she also learned that it was futile to put any trust in the things of men, and instead focus on "the only permanent thing," which is God.>
Susan
Actually, I don't think my God and Holy Spirit wants anger to pass . . .
If you mean by turning your anger to something else, I do agree. However, I think that being detached is more important. We want to let go of our base anger and fear. You can still have passion and urgency in your work, but it is not driven by anger and fear. Anger and fear will eventually lead to a revenge mentality. I suspect that you mean righteous anger.
When you say my God and Holy Spirit who is that God?>
Thanks for sharing your experience on this, Rod. I had just ended college in New Jersey and started graduate school in Tennessee when it happened, but my sister was on Staten Island at Wagner College. She heard the plane hit the tower while she was walking to her office and at first thought that a truck had dropped a dumpster outside. She and her coworkers watched the Towers fall, from across the harbor.
I can only imagine what it must have been like for you and Scott. I know that even halfway across the country, I was in a blind rage for three or four days until I realized that, subconsciously, I was fully prepared to beat the living crap out of the next Muslim I encountered. That scared me.>
I think I better understand the power of forgiveness, as well as its difficulty, since 9/11. It's hard to let go of anger, because in some sense you feel that you are betraying your loved ones, or those that were done wrong, by forgiving -- or at least distancing yourself from the intensity of the anger. Yet if we don't do that, we remain a prisoner of our own anger. I watched "Lawrence of Arabia" yesterday, and the film touches on how the institution of the tribal blood feud among the Arabs keeps them from accomplishing anything. (This is not fiction: read David Pryce-Jones on the shame/honor cultural dynamic; it's the same in the Balkans).
Ultimately, you have to have some mechanism for letting go of the desire for revenge, and doing so with honor. As a sociological matter, the Christian religion offers that by esteeming and sanctifying the act of forgiveness.>
It's hard to let go of anger, because in some sense you feel that you are betraying your loved ones, or those that were done wrong, by forgiving
I suspect this is not small part of the reason Jesus tells us that we have to hate father, mother, and our own lives if we are to follow him. It's a hard saying. One of the hardest, yet like all the hard saying of Jesus, we find that it is unexpectedly freeing if we bite the bullet and do it. We find that forgiving is not excusing, nor is it somehow spitting in the eye of victims. It is, simply, handing one who has done us real evil over to the mercy of God and giving up our completely futile attempt to make them pay by chewing the cud of our own rage. It frees us to love those who have suffered and it frees us from the power of evil men to continue dominating our lives long after they are dead.>
9/11 was a turning point for most of us in many ways. The loss of thousands of lives led to national grief and solidarity. We need to honor the event appropriately.
However, historical context is often lost. Many of us cannot contemplate the thousands of lives lost at Pearl Harbor, and certainly not at Gettysburg or during the battles of the Revolutionary War. Some even post that this is the
"most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history."
Wow. What about Nixon? "Maybe" we could examine the other 40-something administrations and find some pretty shocking things.
(Note- not saying the current administration is perfect, or even close. Just saying the hyperbole is rather extreme.)
Back on the topic of 9/11, my prayer is that those who were touched by loss on that day will find peace and healing. May we be protected from such a drastic loss of life in the future.>
"most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history."
Wow. What about Nixon? "Maybe" we could examine the other 40-something administrations and find some pretty shocking things.
(Note- not saying the current administration is perfect, or even close. Just saying the hyperbole is rather extreme.)
I've thought that one might have to go back to Harding's or even Grant's administration to find the same level of sheer shameless, unembarrassed self-interestedness.>
"most unethical administration in my lifetime. Maybe in American history."
Wow. What about Nixon? "Maybe" we could examine the other 40-something administrations and find some pretty shocking things.
(Note- not saying the current administration is perfect, or even close. Just saying the hyperbole is rather extreme.)
I've thought that one might have to go back to Harding's or even Grant's administration to find the same level of sheer shameless, unembarrassed self-interestedness.
David J. White | 09.11.06 - 6:35 pm | #
Nah. National politics can't hold a candle to corruption at the local level. The extent may be smaller when it happens locally, but the corruption is deeper. Presidents have a long way to go before they rise (or sink) to the level of police departments, mayors and governors. :^)>
We find that forgiving is not excusing, nor is it somehow spitting in the eye of victims. It is, simply, handing one who has done us real evil over to the mercy of God and giving up our completely futile attempt to make them pay by chewing the cud of our own rage. It frees us to love those who have suffered and it frees us from the power of evil men to continue dominating our lives long after they are dead.
Mark, would that you take your own words to heart. If you did, perhaps you would stop engaging in unprovoked personal attacks on those who disagree, let alone obsess about them. Perhaps you would stop deliberately distoring their position. Perhaps you would stop responding to legitimate points with vicious sarcasm and venal vindictiveness.
Don't tell me that you don't know what I'm talking about. You know very well what I'm talking about.
And don't tell me that you forgive me or have forgiven me. If you did, then you wouldn't engage in the above behavior, would you?
Besides, we as Christians have greater responsibilities than being freed from the power of evil men to control us. We have the responsibility to defend the innocent from such evil me. We have the responsibility to defend society from them. Unfortunately, sometimes we have to use nasty and untidy means to do so (see WWII).
Then again, like most Catholic bloggers, you've never let such mundane things as reality and behavioral consistency interfere with your fleshly desire to spin webs of esoteric, etherial rhetoric -- and to trap those you don't like in them.>
Joe, please don't bring your personal dispute with Mark to this site. I'm trying hard to get the personal attacks etc. out of this forum, so we can concentrate on discussing and arguing on issues and positions.>
Well, Rod, among the issues is whether a popular and respected Catholic blogger (i.e., Shea) has any credibility when it comes to his opinions on the War on Terror. Among that blogger's positions is the following:
1. The torture of captured combatants is more important than the willful murder of the innocent through terror (given the amount of time and passion that the blogger in question has spent on the respective issues).
2. JPII's interpretation of "just war" theory as applied to Iraq would have spared the United States much misery (while ignoring the fact that JPII's interpretation on "just war" as applied to Iraq would have kept a sadistic tyrant in power, a tyrant that likely would have aided Hezbollah in its attack on Israel and has been known to support terrorism elsewhere)
Of course, the blogger's position also conveniently ignores these facts:
-- JPII also opposed the 1990-91 Iraq war that was designed to extricate Saddam from Kuwait -- a war that had U.N. support. Had the world listened to the late pope, Kuwait would be an Iraqi province now, and Saddam would be emboldened to commit more aggression.
-- Much of Vatican diplomatic policy toward the Middle East is designed to protect Arab Christians at all costs, even at the cost of appeasing Arab dictators, as was the case under JPII. It also allows anti-Israel (and anti-Semitic) forces within the Vatican to express themselves.
3. The blogger in question disregards (even mocks) the idea that the religion sponsoring much of the terror in the world is radically totalitarian -- despite the fact that the religion's scripture demands that its adherents adopt warfare as a divine duty to bring the world by force under the influence of this religion.
4. The blogger in question routinely and with approval links to sources (Buchanan, Sobran) whose views toward Israel and toward Jews are, to put it politely, questionable.
I know that the blogger in question is your friend, Rod. But don't let friendship blind you to the truth about his ignorance concerning geopolitical matters.>
"Wow. What about Nixon?"
Funny you should mention him. Recently I find myself saying, "Nixon wasn't so bad, was he? Reagan wasn't so dumb, was he?".
I guess everything is relative...>
Funny that you mention my uncle, John, in your story. I'm glad so many people remember him when he could not remember his own family and made it hard for us to even have a memory of him. Isn't it nice that he could take people from half his family on trips to Europe, but when he called his own side of the family, if he called, he announced himself as Mr. John Rigo wishing to speak with Mr. or Mrs. ____ and couldn't even say hello to his other nieces or nephews. It helps to know that someone remembers the more upbeat side of him.>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.