Crunchy Con

More on Kultursmog

Friday September 22, 2006

A Jewish reader -- I point that out only to indicate that this conservative sensibility I keep talking about is by no means limited to Christians -- who is the father of a small child writes:

I share your sentiments 100 %; I suspect Noah probably shook his head and muttered “screw ‘em” as he sailed off. The desire to escape from all this lunacy is strong in our household as well, but, as you say, you can’t escape it. And it’s not like the popular ethos is passive, it will hunt you down if you do try to escape (unless you become a complete hermit out in the middle of nowhere, which, I confess, I would seriously consider if I was still single). The thing that gets me the maddest is every time I read of some person or group who tries to carve out a little island of moral normalcy for themselves. Does the popular culture leave them be? Of course not, it becomes a call to trot out the ACLU and all the so-called do-gooders to stamp out the poor misguided fools who dare question the values of the secular elites. You can’t escape even if you want to. Bastards.


As Neil Postman has written, in the age of electronic media, childhood ceases to exist in the traditional sense (as a time of relative innocence) because there's no way to control the information environment. Small towns used to be a refuge from the craziness, but now the same conformity that used to make them bulwarks against moral innovation now serve to accelerate it, thanks to the electronic media. It's not true, as many conservatives suppose, that the news and entertainment media tell you what to think. No, they drive the culture by setting the boundaries for our conversation. This is one reason why conservative talk radio took off like a shot: the things that tens of millions of conservatives care about, and their opinions about them, have long been effectively shut out of the mainstream media, except when they've been demonized. The situation is a lot better today, but those of us old enough to remember when Rush Limbaugh first hit it big will recall what an absolute blast of free speech and fresh air he was in the stifling media landscape.

Anyway, when the moral and cultural agenda is set by cable TV and the Internet piped into houses everywhere, there is no escape from it, unless you find some way to withdraw. Unless you find some community wherever you live where people refuse and resist the popular culture, and raise their kids to do the same -- and that's a lot harder to do, it seems to me, in a small town. That's been my experience as someone who was raised in a small town, and who has lived in big cities all his adult life.

In Matthew's Christian school, the kids are not allowed to talk about pop culture. That's a blanket rule. The school doesn't require that they stay away from it outside of school, but it does set that rule to help support parents who are trying to raise their children counterculturally. I tell you, it's a godsend. Matthew is a big Harry Potter fan, but he can't talk about that at school. While I might personally draw the line more liberally, I'm grateful to the school for its blanket policy. From what we can tell, other parents there feel pretty much like we do about protecting their kids from the pervasive and predatory popular culture, and that makes Julie and me feel more confident about the environment in which we're raising him.

The so-called "real world" will demand Matthew's attention soon enough. What we hope to do is to shield him as much as possible from the sex, the violence, the crudity and the hard-sell of that world as his conscience is being formed, and he's developing defenses against the lies of the world. I want him to learn how to breathe clean air before he has to breathe the Kultursmog.
Advertisement
Comments
Franklin Evans
September 28, 2006 6:53 AM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Pikkumatti, I think you have it exactly right, even the implication that our disagreements actually have some value in the scheme of things.

I believe that there is a third "category" that needs stating: the person who finds his connections to Truth, Law and Ideals by seeking inside, and looking outward to find that his search is a Good Thing. I state this not because it needs to be in opposition to the externalized "category", but because the semantic differences are important even while it is possible to demonstrate that there is no real difference between them. Perhaps the old cliche about the two sides of the same coin fits.

Not meaning to be glib or flippant, but I believe that we don't really disagree about the source of the Ideal. What we can't agree on is the symbolism involved, on the subjective labels we need to describe it. Your needs and my needs are very different, but our goals bear a strong overlapping resemblance... in my humble opinion. ;)>

pikkumatti
September 28, 2006 3:50 PM

I'll quibble with your "third" category a bit, because it is vulnerable to self-validation. Or maybe I'm just not strong enough to do things that way -- I truly need to be shaken up from the Outside, and be reminded that I don't know everything and that what I thought previously was wrong.

And, I'll submit that my faith ain't just symbols. The data over the last 2k years bears that out.

Other than that, I think we understand each other and are facing in the same direction. Thanks for this great exercise; it is good to have to think things through. And thanks, as always, for your courtesy.>

Franklin Evans
September 28, 2006 4:19 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Quibble away, my friend. I've already worked out that my "third" alternative is a bit of a straw man, not really needed or even relevant. Emphasis on "different section of same side of coin" rather than anything else.

From my POV, we both work equally hard at our otherwise divergent faiths. I mention symbols not to dwell on them, but to imply (strongly) that we are faced with the same struggle faced by all humans: trying to describe an internal process that cannot be fully understood by anyone not living inside my skin. Of all human endeavors, personal enlightenment must share top billing with the brief, rare moments we are permitted to transcend our separation from each other, and truly share a single perception. That, my friend, is why I keep coming to forums like this one, and why I hate them for the further restrictions inherent in not being face-to-face. This is, barely, better than nothing.>

Lutheran Reader
September 29, 2006 3:22 AM

Good discussion, Franklin and Pikkumatti.>

Stefanie
October 7, 2006 8:57 PM

Childhood as a time of "innocence" is a very recent notion, within the past 150 years or so. The rest of the human past, children moved into "adult" activities (starting with learning the tools of their parents' work) as soon as they were physically able. Marriage (most often arranged) came as soon as girls were physically ready.

Interesting point about the school forbidding the discussion of *all* "popular culture." What's forbidden, only modern popular culture, or 19th century p.c. as well? After all, Sherlock Holmes and Dickens, as well as most opera and operettas, were the "pop culture" of their day.>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.