Crunchy Con

Sauce for the halal goose?

Wednesday September 27, 2006

Now here's an interesting situation. Remember the big controversy not long ago over the pro-life pharmacists who didn't want to sell the so-called morning-after pill because it's potentially abortifacient? Remember how they said it would violate their conscience to sell the pill, and how a lot of people got up in arms over it? At the time, I thought they should have the right to refrain; this is a matter of life and death to them. Refusing to sell contraception? No. But this is perhaps the only medication in any pharmacy that when used as directed could cause the death of another human being, in their eyes. To grant them the right to abstain on conscience grounds was a reasonable accomodation, or so it seemed to me.

Well, it seems that at least two Muslim shopkeepers in Brooklyn are refusing on religious grounds to sell alcohol. Excerpt:

“The people who think about the money sell beer,” Mr. Saleh said. “The people who think about their religion more don’t do it.” In addition, he said, students from Middle School 51 across the street used to try to buy beer, and he preferred not to run the risk of getting into trouble for selling to minors.

Kassem Salem, the manager of the Salem Deli, offered similar reasons for filling his beer cooler with Perrier. “Beer’s a big seller,” he said, “but first of all you have to think of your religion.”


I have to admit that I admire these guys for making a stand that costs them money, for the sake of honoring their religion. Though I would be deeply annoyed if I lived in their neighborhood and wanted to buy a six-pack. Do you see any kind of parallel in principle between these men refusing for reasons of conscience to sell beer, and the Christian pro-life pharmacists?

What about the Muslim cabbies in Minneapolis who refuse to transport arriving airport passengers suspected of carrying alcohol? If they refuse a fare, the airport makes the cabbies go to the back of the line. That seems just to me. Declining to sell somebody alcohol is one thing, but refusing to give a ride to someone who has a bottle of Scotch from the duty-free? No. The reader who sent me the link takes a dim view of all of this, saying "Sharia law is slowly becoming a part of our daily lives as we acquiese to these demands."
Advertisement
Comments
steve
September 28, 2006 4:51 PM
hry/stry.php?storyId=5736831

correction:

, and the Muslim store employees....

Gosh.>

Alicia
September 28, 2006 6:01 PM

I think a small business owner has every right to make decisions about what he (or she) sells in his store.

However, a licensed pharmacist in someone else's business shouldn't be allowed to make that kind of decision. As to whether the employer of that pharmacist has the right, I'm not sure. Perhaps it depends upon whether that particular company has a monopoly in the region it serves.>

Alicia
September 28, 2006 6:36 PM

Additionally, perhaps corporations ought to be treated differently than individual business owners. There is one solution that I'm not sure anyone has mentioned.

That is to forbid anyone to sell anything at all to people who don't have the same philosphical and religious and political beliefs as the seller. Limit the customer pool in that way and you might just eliminate the problem. He he.>

eCurious
September 29, 2006 1:12 AM

David White's comment from this morning deserves a closer look. What if the legally prescribed drugs are for the purpose of euthanasia? What if a state has enacted a law that lets physicians prescribe such drugs so that the patient can do away with him/herself in the privacy of his/her home, instead of having to be in a hospital or doctor's office? What if the pharmacist's moral beliefs absolutely forbid him or her to dispense such a prescription? Will people like Mr. White then insist that those people whose consciences won't allow them to assist someone's suicide shouldn't be working as pharmacists?>

Ostrea
September 29, 2006 1:48 AM

If I am the only licensed doctor within reach by a prospective patient who thinks she needs an abortion (assuming she will not die if she doesn't get one), am I obligated to perform the abortion she requests or face the loss of my license? I think not.>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.