I lived in New York for Egan's beginning, and the early part of his reign. I can tell you from my personal contacts among the priests of the archdiocese, that he was not popular. Even those conservative priests who were ideologically predisposed to support him found themselves quickly alienated. He could be a great preacher -- I heard him preach a series of sermons at the long Good Friday liturgy at St. Patrick's, and they were probably the best homilies I ever heard from a Catholic pulpit (faint praise, possibly, but still, they were excellent, and I wrote him a letter urging him to publish them somewhere). But he really did lack the common touch, which was an acute deficiency as O'Connor's successor.
You really saw this in the aftermath of 9/11. One priest I knew shook his head sadly at Egan's low profile in the days immediately following, saying that O'Connor would have rushed to the pile at once. That wasn't Egan's way. Then, to the shock and dismay of many NY Catholics -- especially considering that many of the firefighters who perished on 9/11 were Catholics from the Irish, Italian and Latino communities -- Egan ran off to Rome to a long-planned synod, which he had been put in charge of. People couldn't believe he would leave his city still reeling, just weeks after the 9/11 attacks, to go off and run a meeting of bishops. But he did.
This passage from an October 11, 2001, story in the NY Times really captured the cardinal's pastoral blind spot:
When Pope John Paul II asked Cardinal Edward Egan of New York to spend October here, helping him run a monthlong gathering of bishops from around the world, the cardinal could hardly object.
But while the bishops are at the Vatican, rethinking their role in the world, isn't the cardinal perhaps rethinking his own role, and his decision to leave his grief-stricken flock?
No, he said in a recent interview here -- first, because he is returning to New York this week for some days to mark the month that has passed since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
His work at the Vatican conference, or synod, is important, too, he said. And Rome in many ways is home to the Chicago-bred cardinal.
''I lived here for almost 23 years and love the town,'' Cardinal Egan said, sinking back into a couch in the lounge of an American seminary and calling for an aide to bring him a ginger ale. ''I was ordained in this town, taught here for 17 years and in this building for 4. I'm an old hand.''
Asked again if it was not hard, nonetheless, to be away from New York at such a moment, he said, ''I would not be at all unhappy to be back in New York now."
Wow, Eminenza, that's the spirit. Not. You can perhaps see the character trait that's gotten him in such a bad spot with so many of his priests.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Lee, if you cannot see the utter tackiness of Rod's continued crusade against the Catholic bishops, in the light of recent developments, then what can I say?
Maybe it's time for Rod to expend as many mental calories on Orthodox problems (OCA scandal, Greek sex scandal, the fact that the MP is an ex-KGB agent, just for starters) as he has on Catholic problems.
(And yes, I know he has acknowledged the OCA thing. But he sure in heck hasn't obsessed about it as he did about the Catholic scandal.)
We are called to clean our own houses, not constantly look for dirt in other people's.
Diane
P.S. Many other Catholic journalists and commentators have done a superb job of writing about the Catholic scandals. Reading Rod's rantings on the subject is not your only option.>
And comparing writing about the hierarchy to staring into the abyss is dispicable.>
Austin, here's why I liken investigating the Temple Masters of our time to staring into the abyss:
Go here for an overview:
http://www.bishopaccountability.org/
and go here to read about ++Levada:
http://www.mgr.org/LevadaTrajectory-Details.html
and read Jason Berry's essay about Levada, too:
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2005_07_12/2005_09_22_Berry_TheMan.htm
Lee>
A faithful Catholic does not refer to the Hierarchy as staring into the abyss.>
Austin, since when was the Catholic hierarchy faithful to anything but its own lust for power and prestige?>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.