Crunchy Con

"Match Point"

Monday October 23, 2006

Well, the Internet mysteriously restored itself here at home tonight, so yay for that. We'll get back to regular blogging tomorrow (there was a slew of stuff from over the weekend that I wanted to mention for discussion, so maybe some of it at least will go up tomorrow, when Mr. Mom gets a break -- and hey, all props to moms! I did want to mention something tonight that struck me as odd, and probably a sign that I'm slip-sliding into full-blown fuddyhood.

When Matthew was born in 1999, I remember spending a cold Saturday afternoon that fall nesting in the basement living room of our Brooklyn apartment with the newborn baby. The Scorsese film "Goodfellas" came on cable, and I was excited; I hadn't seen it since it had been released a few years earlier, and it was the No. 1 film on my Top Ten list that year (I was a professional film critic at the time). I settled in for a long, enjoyable afternoon getting reacquainted with the film. But about 45 minutes into it, I had to turn the TV off. There was so much graphic violence in the movie that I literally couldn't watch it. I had never been overly affected by that stuff, but somehow sitting in the room with that tiny little baby, and intuiting from that how precious human life is, and how fragile -- well, I literally couldn't continue with "Goodfellas." It wasn't one of these "I'd like to, but I really shouldn't" moments; it was "nope, can't do it, goodbye."

So, flash-forward to last night. The kids were asleep (Baby Nora in my arms) and Julie and I decided to watch Woody Allen's "Match Point," about which we'd heard such good things. It got to the part in which the married protagonist begins his obsessive affair with Scarlett Johansson, and I swear, I could not watch it. It wasn't the somewhat graphic sex; it was the deed being done, this creep cheating so vividly on his kind, sweet wife. I felt defiled just watching it. I said to Julie, "You're not going to believe this, but this is making me really anxious. I hate watching this guy do this." I tried to shake it off, but finally said, "I can't do this anymore."

"Well, let's turn it off then."

"Let's."

I'm still trying to figure out why I reacted so strongly to these scenes. I've seen far worse on film, and been unaffected by it. I confess that part of it must be that Scarlett Johansson has to be the most boring major actress around. Had the cad been boffing someone like Kate Winslet, someone who had a modicum of wit or mystery about her, maybe it would have been easier to watch, instead of seeing a character betray his wife with such a dumb, dull bunny. But deep down, I don't think that's it. I think I just couldn't stand to watch this creep betray his good wife like this. And I'm left wondering if my visceral negative reaction had anything to do with the fact that while I was watching this, I held my sleeping newborn baby daughter in my arms.
Comments
sion
October 25, 2006 7:27 PM

While I don't doubt the sincerity of what you wrote, it's far too maudlin for me. Honestly. It was a movie for heaven's sake, not a referendum on fidelity or parenting.>

T.G. Scott
October 27, 2006 7:44 PM

Congratulations! Your conscience convicted you and you acted on it. I became more sensitive to input, however passive, in regard to my leisure time spent in front of the TV in the den. I don't watch it many times. I like the TV on for background noise when I'm working on other things. However, there are some programs and movies that shock us enough to get us to turn them off. I think it's a really good thing to feel so compelled once in awhile. I can't remember the movie I saw some years ago, but it had Laura Dern and Nicholas Cage in it, and he bashed in some man's head like an egg on the sidewalk within the first 20 minutes or so. It so creeped me out that I immediately turned it off. I still cringe thinking about it now.>

anon
October 30, 2006 12:03 AM

Lord have mercy, redoppto. I'm a Cradle Catholic, and for as long as I can remember, I've been repelled by violent and amoral movies. I don't watch them, period.

But of course, since I haven't been "Truly Born Again(TM)" as an Orthodox, and therefore I Lack Grace (right?), my aversion to such movies cannot be attributed to the Holy Spirit; it must be some quirk or sumpin'.

Sheesh. ISTM Rod doesn't know what he has got himself into. But let's leave that for another time, another thread.

God bless,

Diane>

fitness
November 9, 2006 9:03 PM
http://www.fitness-world.org/

good site
">http://www.fitness-world.org/>

language
November 9, 2006 9:32 PM
http://www.info-language.com/

good site
">http://www.info-language.com/>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement