Crunchy Con

Withdrawing in disgust isn't apathy

Friday October 20, 2006

An exceptionally satisfying blog entry from Daniel Larison, who doesn't appreciate being lectured to by Tony Blankley on his duty as a conservative to vote Republican, despite it all, at the risk of being "stupid." Excerpt:

I know voter apathy is considered a Big Problem by people in the chattering classes, but do they really consider it to be quite so…foul? It must be frustrating to be an important figure in the “movement” and Republican circles and watch as your supporters take one look at your guys, shrug in indifference and walk away. It must be infuriating that your own supporters would actually expect significant results or some of that “advancing” of conservative principle that the party is supposedly so good at doing, and then have the nerve to repudiate the party when it failed to live up to its end of the bargain! What do they think this is, a representative government? So I suppose you would not view these folks kindly. But surely such a person can do better than to start yelling, “You’re a big, fat stupidhead!”


Or, as Richard Linklater's character in "Slacker" said, "Withdrawal in disgust is not the same as apathy."
Advertisement
Comments
Blatz
October 24, 2006 5:01 PM
http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2366

Obalama>

Andy Nowicki
October 24, 2006 11:30 PM
www.andynowicki.blogspot.com

Not to be pedantic, but the character who uttered the "Withdrawal in disgust" line in Linklater's great movie SLACKER wasn't Linklater himself- it was another character (I don't know the actor's name-- all of the characters in the movie are no-name actors anyway, which is part of the movie's charm). Linklater has a speaking role himself, but he's not the character who delivers the line in question.

And by the way, I agree with Dreher on this one. I'm tired of all of the hand-wringing over "voter apathy." I say don't vote-- it only encourages them.>

Bubba
October 25, 2006 1:37 AM
http://concrunchy.blogspot.com/

Franklin, re: your remarks to AA:

Thank you for a demon-stration of irrational analysis (demons) around something that doesn't exist (Democrats, or any human being really, cheering over death).

Did the Mideast cheering over 9/11 not occur, or were those who did the cheering not really human, or were they cheering something other than mass murder?

Are there people who celebrate death? Absolutely, and if you want to invoke the body count in Iraq, I will remind you it wasn't conservatives who were sadistically salivating over specific death tolls, who couldn't wait to announce the 1,000th or 3,000th casualty.>

Franklin Evans
October 25, 2006 1:42 AM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Bubba,

You're right, but you also read more into it than I intended. On that note, I could have been less vague in my original wording.

Besides, AA was referring to Democrats celebrating the abortion deaths. I don't find that to be quite human in either conception or delivery... if you'll forgive the puns.>

Steve Nicoloso
October 26, 2006 12:50 AM
http://guildedlilies.tripod.com/index.html

Has anybody suggested the positive good of divided government? It worked miracles in the 90's. It effectively ties the hands of both the executive and legislative branches and prevents them from doing anything that isn't overwhelmingly supported.

Divided gov't is best... because governments are never worse that when they actually do stuff!>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.