Goldstein, in addition to being a porn king, made an art of self-loathing. It pervades “I, Goldstein” and was his most driving and destructive force. Despite his aggressively funny writing style, Goldstein doubted he was truly intelligent. A self-described “bed-wetting stutterer from Brooklyn” and a punching bag for neighborhood toughs, he feared he would become a milquetoast like his father, a photojournalist who exhibited courage in World War II, working alongside the likes of Ernie Pyle, but addressed elevator operators as “sir.” (He later toiled in Screw’s mailroom.) Goldstein, forever self-conscious about his weight, compensated by making voraciousness the cornerstone of his identity. He describes, touchingly, how as a teenager he was treated by a diet doctor — with whom it turned out his mother was having an affair, because “my father was so inadequate.” Thus he entered manhood primed to defy all who crossed him, and he fulfilled this wish, metaphorically flushing hypocrites and incompetents from President Nixon to his auto mechanic in a ceremonial toilet bowl.
Above all, Goldstein really wanted to be somebody.
...brought to mind my brief personal acquaintance with the man. It was 10 years ago, when "The People vs. Larry Flynt" was in theaters. I was a film critic for the Sun-Sentinel in Fort Lauderdale, and Al Goldstein was a local resident (he owned a mansion there). We decided to profile him -- our own local outlaw pornographer. I interviewed him by telephone, and met with Goldstein twice in the course of writing the piece. I visited the Manhattan offices of his (now-defunct) magazine Screw, and later met him and his then-wife for dinner at Elaine's, and on a second occasion he invited me and a friend to one of his regular Sunday brunches (he'd rent out the room of a restaurant, and fill the place with his buddies). I had to look at copies of Screw for research, and it was probably the most repulsive, degrading thing I've ever seen. It was utterly despicable, and without the least redeeming merit. Yet I was genuinely startled by how much I pitied Goldstein -- I mean, really pitied him, not in a sneering, condescending way. I don't think I've ever met anyone who was such a black hole of raw emotional need. Nor have I ever met anyone who so plainly despised himself -- or in whom self-loathing manifested itself so strangely. When he talked about his son, Jordan (that he would give his son that kind of name tells us a lot), doing well at Georgetown, he got tears in his eyes. He was, as I recall, estranged from his son at the time, and if memory serves, felt acutely that his boy was ashamed of his old man. And Goldstein thought the boy should be ashamed of him ... and yet he loved that kid ferociously. What a sad, complicated man. And incapable of learning a thing: this 2004 Page Six item finds the elderly Goldstein, despised by his son (who since graduated from Harvard Law), living in a homeless shelter, receiving charity from bums. Still, he tells Page Six: "People ask me would I trade it, if I knew 35 years ago what would happen to me? I wouldn't. It's been a fair trade. I had the best women, the best wine and the best cigars."
There was no question, of course, that he was (and perhaps still is) a malicious pig. But to be around him is to see that the true object of his malice is himself. His entire life's work is an elaborate pageant of self-torment. I went into this assignment with extreme distaste, expecting to confront a two-bit monster, but found ... well, yes, that, but something else too. Al Goldstein's story is not yet done. Who knows what is in his future? Peace, I hope; underneath all that fat and filth and spite is a human being. A human being deformed by evil and the absence of love, but a human being created for something else (hmm, perhaps not unlike...). I mean, I'm not one of those sentimental people who looks at bad men and imagines a pitiable, cringing creature underneath it all. But in Goldstein's case, I have to admit it was pretty hard for me to conclude otherwise.
Two other things came to mind: 1) Goldstein told me he got started on his path when his uncle took him as a teenager to a prostitute, to initiate him into manhood; 2) when my pal Lebowitz and I went to Goldstein's brunch, we met the proprietor of the Bunny Ranch brothel in Nevada, who offered to comp us as Friends of Al if we ever made it out West. When we told our girlfriends about this, they were not amused.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Al Goldstein gave himself over to real and palpable evil. There's no temptation to make fun of a person like that. Anyway, where would you start?
Rod Dreher
I've known people who gravitated to the bottom of the tank. The one thing they all seemed to have in common is either genetic abuse or were the victim of physical if not social abuses.
For many years I've viewed Goldstein as the poster boy for victimhood. I know the position might not be popular but it's the way I see it.
I see assuming Rod's position of Goldstein making a choice and then relishing the fruits of that choice as being irresponsible as a person, irresponsible as a citizen, and irresponsible as a person of faith.
We all find a comfort zone. Sometimes that comfort zone is difficult to understand from our perspective.
Goldstein found that he could accomodate criticism and disdain was palatable. But he was uncomfortable when confronted with acceptance and appreciation. So everytime he felt uncomfortable he'd create a situation where the circumstances were those he found preferable.
I'm sure we've all worked with the person in the office that thrived in chaos. When the stuff was hitting fans in every direction they were the calm one. But when it all was going smoothly they were the one that was like a fish out of water. Invariably they'd start something just to be comfortable again.
Goldstein is just another variant of that common human personality trait. A lot more extreme I'll agree, but really no different when the rubber meets the road from people we interact with everyday.
Yeah, I know calling it evil and giving it divine design is simpler. But it's also stupider.>
>he [Goldstein] was uncomfortable when confronted with acceptance and appreciation. So everytime he felt uncomfortable he'd create a situation where the circumstances were those he found preferable.
Reminds me a bit of a haunting cable documentary I saw a few years ago on the late SNL comedian Chris Farley. The guy blew tons of scratch on coke and hookers and such, and obviously had an extreme craving for attention/affection, given his "acting out" on all occasions (seeing him on talk shows was to bite your nails in spellbound apprehension of what scenery-chewing might come next).
Yet - get this - it was made plain that whenever out with friends and faced with any nice young woman who made a good faith effort to warm to him and try to get to know him a bit better on a simple human level - he'd go instanter into his "berserker" mode, a John Belushi on steroids as it were, killing off any overture in embryo instanter, ensuring the local working girls a place on his retainer unto his early grave. It made for painful viewing, indeed.>
eCurious (unum?)
I wasn't comparing Rod to Al Goldstein. I was comparing Rod's treatment of Al Goldstein to Rod's treatment of Bishop Jefferts-Schori.
Feel free to re-read what I posted.>
This description reminds me a little bit of Mickey Sabbath, from Phillip Roth's very great book "Sabbath's Theatre". You ought to check it out, a magnificent piece of work about human nature, darkness, and light.>
But gee wiz, what a laugh, eh, me spiritual compatriots? I gander it reminds me of the ol' days, back on those sunny corn filled memories of 1826, when my daughter, Becky met God, and god ye willing. . .Hallejujah, she found her own ear o' corn. And then Adam blessed be born.>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.