Doom, gloom, the usual
While I don't agree with all of it -- defending Hugo Chavez? Huh? -- Jeff Taylor has a
pretty solid take on this election, at least as far as this excerpt goes:
If control of Congress changes hands in January, it will be because the Republicans lost, not because the Democrats won. The national Democratic Party is not trying to win elections this year. It is sitting back, playing it safe, and watching the Republican Party self-destruct. The Democrats have no message beyond tired old clichés they've been spouting for decades. The Republicans are reduced to a different set of clichés - about winning the war and keeping taxes low and standing up for traditional values - but to most Americans these words ring hollow. The Republican record speaks for itself and it contradicts the party's rhetoric.
The Bush administration has overreached. Years of incompetence, deceit, and hypocrisy have caught up with it, and the President's lackeys in Congress are going to pay a price on Election Day. If Democrats take over the House and/or Senate, it will be by default. It will be because Republicans deserve to lose, not because Democrats deserve to win. In fact, both parties deserve to lose, but at the moment Republicans more richly deserve to lose. Also, with a two-party system there is no easy way for Americans to register their displeasure with the tweedledee party in power other than voting for the tweedledum party out of power.
If Democrats unseat Republicans in Congress, the party should not interpret the result as a mandate for the Clintons, Rahm Emanuel, and the Democratic Leadership Council. It will be nothing of the sort. If Democratic leaders had populist principles and genuine guts, they would bury the Republican hacks in a landslide of 1932 or 1974 proportions. Instead, they will be lucky to eek out a narrow victory. They have pulled their punches and relied on mushy talking points with little popular appeal. They are complicit in the very policies most disliked by Americans: war in Iraq, plutocratic government, dogmatic materialism, runaway federal expenditures, outsourcing of jobs, illegal immigration for the sake of corporate exploitation, and civil liberties sacrificed in a climate of fear.
Democrats in Washington have nothing to offer populist, libertarian, or evangelical Americans, but it's become obvious to many Republicans of those varieties that they've been taken for a ride. So, on Election Day they will either stay home or vote (D) to teach (R) a lesson. But the 2006 results will not change the fact that the Democratic Party has serious ongoing problems.
Oh good grief. Speaking of the white working class as an entity no more makes you a Klucker than speaking of the black working class makes you a Black Panther. Calm down. Jim Webb speaks of how the liberal cultural elite has made a project of putting down the white working class -- "rednecks" -- for quite some time. It's true. You shouldn't be surprised if they resent it.>
If it walks and talks like a duck Rod...>
You are right thoug Rod, i shouldn't over-generalize, I don't mean to imply all racists are members of the KKK, I wouldn't want to offend the honorable racists afterall.>
JoeTX,
I agree with you. The problem, however, is aptly summed up in a line from the musical "1776": Most men with nothing would rather protect the possibility of becoming rich, than face the reality of being poor.
I remember reading that when George McGovern was campaigning in 1972, he encountered again and again a willingness among ordinary people to support policies that were against their own economic interest. He concluded that these people must all think they are going to win the lottery some day, and are trying to protect the wealth they figure they will one day have. I have to say, I don't think he was too far off the mark.>
You know, Taylor's column is a crock on several levels:
...civil liberties sacrificed in a climate of fear...
Whose civil liberties? Yours? Mine? Where are the consentration camps? Where is the secret police knocking on doors in the middle of the night? Where is the suspension of habeas corpus (as Pres. Lincoln mandated during the Civil War)? Where are the Espionage and Sedition acts (that Pres. Wilson signed in 1917 and 1918)?
...both parties deserve to lose, but at the moment Republicans more richly deserve to lose...
So that means electing members of a party that is far more out of touch with the American people and has no clue about how to govern -- or how to do anything but shout insults?
Also, with a two-party system there is no easy way for Americans to register their displeasure with the tweedledee party in power other than voting for the tweedledum party out of power.
So that means that we should go to a parliamentary system, with all the attendant messiness of forming coalitions when one party doesn't have an absolute majority? If you don't like Washington, you sure as Hell won't like proportional party representation in a parliament.
You know, I realize that cynicism and panic are the sentiments du jour on this blog. That doesn't mean that they're intelligent ones. That also doesn't mean that Pres. Bush is The Best Of All Possible Preidents or that the GOP is The Best Of All Possible Parties. But the effete, narcisstic arrogance displayed by Taylor, other commentators on this blog and even Rod himself is downright nauseating.
I never expected Rod to be a political Goth.>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.