The Dallas Morning News has been running this week an excellent series about Cactus, Texas, a wretched little town in the Panhandle. The town is about 75 percent illegal immigrant, and the only reason to move there is to work in the large meat processing facility. Crime is rampant -- robbery, drug abuse, alcoholism, prostitution, among other things -- and the rule of law is a nice idea there. If we rounded up and shipped out all the illegals, the town would die in an instant. It is very, very difficult to imagine Americans who would be willing to move to this ugly town in the middle of nowhere to work in a bone-crushingly hard job for the kinds of wages that illegals are willing to accept. It's hard to imagine Americans being willing to put up with the abuse of workers that the illegals have to endure -- check out today's story for details -- because as illegals, they are in no position to complain.
A Baptist pastor in Cactus who works among the migrants says that these people are worked like "animals." I believe it. I am down on industry for the way it breaks the law to get cheap labor, and then exploits these human beings. If the slaughterhouses paid the kinds of wages necessary to entice American workers to do this kind of nasty, backbreaking labor, they'd have to jack up the price of meat. And that's something the American people will not tolerate. Therefore, we are complicit in the lawbreaking and exploitation. As a University of Kansas anthropology professor who studied the situation in slaughterhouses told my newspaper today, "The general public, as long as their food is cheap, as long as it's safe, as long as the workers aren't really that much like them, they can look the other way."

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Man, all this talk of slaughterhouses has me hungry.
I'm heading over to Austin to see what they have at the Day Old Meat shop.>
Rich:
My stepdad makes about 17 an hour now, but he's been there at Hormel since 1969. Adjusted for inflation, it's probably a little better than the 9.69 before the strike, but not by a lot. The standard of living is pretty much the same now in Austin as it was then...
One big difference in the town is how the automation of the Hormel plant has affected the demographics of the town. The old plant employed near to 3,000 people at its peak. The new one [circa 1982] runs about 1700 tops, including QPP, and puts out a lot more product. The big change is that there is a far bigger percentage of immigrants working there now than 25 years ago.>
'I pity them greatly, but I must be mum, For how could we do without sugar and rum?'
William Cowper - 1788
We do the same these days - cheap clothes made with child labour, cheap coffee, tea etc. Same with meat.>
Um, maybe I missed something, but I would guess that the VAST majority of McDonald's and Burger King customers nationwide (at least 95%) have no freakin' clue about how slaughterhouses work or who works in them. Count me among them.
I hardly think that makes me complicit in their exploitation. I'm all for punishing employers who break the law, both in their hiring of illegal immigrants and in their exploitation of same. Of course, I also don't eat fast food with any regularity. But it is important to make people aware of it, anyway; that's the only way they can make an informed decision.
I think you give the average American WAY too much credit as far as their understanding of the economy goes.>
Just a second. I would guess everyone knows that the slabs of gray stuff wrapped in McDonald's foil isn't beef. Sure as hell doesn't taste like beef.
Now think about this meat thing. If I pay twice as much for my ground chuck, I'll have to drop my $5.00 coffee from Starbuck's - and similar bits of culinary fluff.
But I can't do that!>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.