Crunchy Con

Hooching up little girlz

Tuesday December 5, 2006

If there is a children's toy more odious than the slutty Bratz dolls, I don't want to know about it (here's the Wiki entry on them, and here's the official website). They, and their Baby Bratz spinoffs, are hugely popular...
Advertisement
Comments
Dale Price
December 5, 2006 5:51 PM
http://dprice.blogspot.com

As a father of two young girls (5 and 2), if I get started on this topic, I will never stop.

My oldest daughter asked me why I "hated" Bratz. I told her it was because the Bratz dolls teach that girls are only important if they have the right clothes and look pretty enough for boys, and that that was wrong--girls are supposed to be so much more.

I am happy to relate that they still yell in unison "Braaatz!" whenever the commmercials come on, permitting me to stab the remote.

Lileks' piece is a classic, not so BTW. Inspired a rant of my own.

Oh, and check out the hootchie mama Halloween costumes offered up for the past two years by the soulless corporate shills at MGA:

http://www.costumecraze.com/DIVA34.html

OK--I'll stop now.>

s.a.farris
December 5, 2006 6:08 PM

I have two sons. They DO like dolls, despite their words to the contrary (the Backyardigans, Dora and Diego) but I'm glad that the odious Bratz don't register with them.
I did see one instance of "Girl Power" nicely applied at my son's 4th birthday party, held yesterday. One little pal slid off the My Gym slide head-first and bumped her cheek on the carpet. Her mother comforted her for a good few minutes and, when she felt better, another parent gave the girl a "Girl Power" high-five for being so brave.
The little girl smiled and ran to the trampoline.
By the way, my son and all 9 party attendees have autism.>

Happy Catholic
December 5, 2006 6:14 PM

I have a 10-year-old daughter. Somebody gave her a barbie when she was younger, but it never got much use. Maybe once in a while when she had a friend over. Never had bratz and wouldn't have gotten them. Never said much about it though. She much prefers stuffed animals (of which she has too many) and drawing and crafts.

We never overtly directed her friendships but none of her many friends are bratz fans or "tarted up" in any way. They like to play dress-up and care far more about their appearance than the boys I know but it is all very wholesome. With my daughter, it always seems to include the color pink and Hello Kitty is a favorite accessory. As I've gotten to know the parents, (she picked her own friends) they are all reasonably adjusted folks with good morals who are close to their daughters. Water tends to find its own level.

Kids learn more from their parents than we think. If you're living a moral life and you stay engaged with you're kids, they will follow your example. There have always been slutty moms raising slutty daughters. When I was an adolescent male, I had more appreciation for the type than I do as a dad but really it isn't new. I have stories from my parents who grew up as immigrants in the 30's and 40's and they have stories every bit as salacious as anything coming out now. With the collapse of the family and folks even raising them in the "culture of desire" these incidents are more prevalent but still not that hard to avoid.

It really isn't that hard to avoid the negative stuff, just don't buy into it yourself.>

Mark
December 5, 2006 6:19 PM
ocabatonrouge.blogspot.com

We've forbidden Bratz in our home, though the youngest of our three daughters is frighteningly intrigued by the stuff her friends at school like to show off.

Yuck.

Refusal and resistance is no small task... have you noticed that the general trend in available and affordable pre-pubsecent girls' clothing is very "Bratzy"? We're not exactly Puritans, but please...

And re: s.a.farris above, I can definitely appreciate that kind of girl power. One of our daughters has autism, and we cling to moments of triumph like you described.>

Anonymous
December 5, 2006 6:26 PM

But what if your little girl wants that stuff? I'm being facetious; I know what you'd do. I think this entry is another example of your weird obsession with purity-- whether it's religion, sex, food, etc. How do you keep yourself so much purer than thou?>

James P
December 5, 2006 6:39 PM

In other words, the world, the flesh and the devil are all wrapped up in for sale undisguised in toys intended for young--- and now even younger-- girls. My four-year-old daughter is drawn to this crap when we go to the toy store, and, yes, we refuse and resist. There is something psychological and primal about the draw, and MGA Entertainment is clearly on to something. I'll bet their internal market research documents are very interesting. What will replace Bratz in another ten or twenty years if the trend continues? I shudder.>

Maclin Horton
December 5, 2006 6:45 PM
http://www.lightondarkwater.com/blog

I don't like your fashion business, mister.
I don't like these drugs that keep you thin.
I don't like what happened to my sister.
First we take Manhattan--then we take Berlin.

--Leonard Cohen, "First We Take Manhattan">

god-is-in-the-tv
December 5, 2006 6:48 PM

What will replace Bratz in another ten or twenty years if the trend continues? I shudder.


Anatomically correct Jenna Jameson dolls complete with "pre- and post-op" inflatable chest?>

Rod Dreher
December 5, 2006 6:54 PM

Yep, and they'll market them as "empowering.">

Erik
December 5, 2006 7:07 PM
http://dawnpiper.livejournal.com

Fortunately our daughter isn't interested in Bratz (my wife refers to them as "hydrocephalic prostitute dolls" :), but even if she were they wouldn't cross the threshold. Frankly, I'm even a little iffy on Barbie, but that bridge was crossed long ago and there ain't no goin' back...

the youngest of our three daughters is frighteningly intrigued by the stuff her friends at school like to show off

That's one of the best things about homeschooling - we still have a modicum of control over her external environment.

(And before someone starts yammering about "socialization" - our homeschool group is quite diverse, running the gamut from quite conservative Christians to... well, to us, really... ;) and including families from a number of ethnic backgrounds, socioeconomic strata, etc.)>

s.a.farris
December 5, 2006 7:16 PM

Mark from the previous post,
Thank your for your kind understanding of "girl power." May your daughter(s) be blessed.>

Franklin Evans
December 5, 2006 7:24 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

My daughters are 23 and 14. R is getting married next August; H is taking Saturday classes at a nearby art college. Both have a clear and very personal view of "fashion" and appearance, and neither of them has strayed into the trap of looking like what others want them to look. Besides my encouragement and that of my sisters, they have their mother to thank for it. H had the added help of her older sister, and we allowed her to start buying her own clothes two full years ealier than we let R do so.

Before it became likely that such gifts would be purchased, my wife and I laid down the law with both of our families: any gift other than clothing had to be approved by one of us, no exceptions. In this way, we warded off the worst of the fads, Barbie never crossed our threshold, and dolls of any sort (including non-human stuffed friends) were chosen just like one might decide to take in a living pet. I won't say that my children (including our son) are immune to the commercial plague, but we've innoculated them about as well as it is possible to be so, short of making them live on a mountain top or in a bomb shelter.

An open message to all the parents out there who don't see the danger in letting their children masquerade as adults: if you shudder at the thought of a predator getting his or her hands on your child, why in the name of every god would you dress your child to be a tempting target? Do you really want every adult male who sees your daughter to be attracted to her?

Somewhere along the way, being well-groomed seems to have become restricted to looking like a well-groomed adult. Kids should look like kids.>

Eric
December 5, 2006 9:26 PM

I had never heard of "Bratz" until this post. Then again, I haven't watched Saturday morning cartoons since they took muppet babies off the air.

Not that I'm a huge fan (and I can just hear the chorus of someone yelling hypocrite to this post), but this whole discussion about "Bratz" reminded me of the South Park Episode making fun of Paris Hilton. Disgusting but hilarious.

I can just see the marketing folks in their board rooms...hmmm, well, we can sell this denigrating stuff to little girls. But, what about the feminists!! Ah, we'll just say that we are sexually empowering women by calling it sassy. We'll say that we are teaching little girls how to assert themselves early on, and how dare you patriachal fathers say any different. That way we won't have NOW screaming at our doorsteps. Oh, and we'll also play off a child's natural tendency toward rebellion by giving this product shock value. That way, even though these kids want to feel as if they are unique, we will be duping them into conforming to our market share goals.

Eric>

watsy
December 5, 2006 10:42 PM

My daughters(twins-5yr)love the Bratz. I have mixed feelings about the Bratz.

I like them better than Barbie. They have big heads, big feet, weird eyes, and lips on steroids. Aspiring to look like a Bratz doll will not be a goal.

IMO: They are funny. I wouldn't want my daughters to make a habit of talking like the Bratz, but now and then, it's funny. Example-one day my 5 year old got dressed and asked the other 5 year old how the outfit she had chosen looked. The 5 yr old replied, "You are stylin, girlfriend!" Then they both giggled. They play "girlfriend" a lot.

My girls have a passion for fashion. They didn't get it from the Bratz. They've liked to make outfits out of dress-up stuff since they've been 2 or 3. Some of the things they put together are pretty impressive. Many are just plain ridiculous. They like pretty things.

We talk a lot about the Bratz and the mall thing. They LOVE the whole idea of shopping and buying pretty things. They'll have to learn money management lessons or they'll go broke.

My girls aren't shallow. They are both very caring people. They are kind to their friends. They love animals and prefer to play with stuffed animals over just about any other toy.

The Bratz aren't sluts. They have friends that are boys, but they are friends and not lovers or lust objects.

Girl power is a great thing. The Bratz work through conflicts. They make mistakes. They admit their mistakes. They forgive each other. They are best friends.>

Mike
December 5, 2006 11:46 PM

Watsy - seriously, listen to yourself.

Anyway, as someone who values the sexual revolution and wants to see sexuality become more open and honest and prevalent in our culture, this sort of stuff is horrible, it'll set us back another 50 years. And, by aligning itself with people who think we should be honest and open about sex and the human body, Bratz and such makes us look like fawning pedophiles.

Has no man had the stomach-churning experience of checking out a barely-dressed woman from a distance and then, with a closer look, realizing that she's 12? Just that makes me want to drive these companies into the ocean.

And Leonard Cohen did say it best.>

Sherp
December 6, 2006 12:03 AM

Here's an idea, unplug the TV. Nobody is forcing anybody to watch TV. I just don't get it when people complain about what is on the tube but refuse to turn it off. If your kids absolutely have to watch a cartoon on Saturday morning, check it out from the library.>

god_is_in_the_tv
December 6, 2006 12:29 AM

It works - it's been 5 years since I watched television. I'm strictly an online media and dvd viewer now. I can be more selective that way.>

Greling
December 6, 2006 12:35 AM

I say that this all could have been avoided had Ken recieved a penis. Our sexphobic culture has inspired a cutural phenomenon where the suffers engage in overcompensation.

And the whole "Bratz" concept must be for adults' egos because my little sister doesn't really have the abstract thinking level to really care about halter tops, miniskits or shiny hips or know what their significance is. All she cares about is if the doll's female and if the hair can be combed out with a real comb.>

elizabeth
December 6, 2006 1:38 AM

We call them Slutz. Hooker Dollz.>

Grumpy Old Man
December 6, 2006 1:40 AM
http://www.globaloctopus.blogspot.net/

My girls had innumerable Barbies who inevitably became naked (and sometimes headless) in short order.

Listening to them play with the Barbies, it became quite clear that they were working out their own ideas through play. Some of the stuff they came up with was worthy of an O'Neill drama, and had nothing to do with what the Mattel marketing department thought girls are interested in.

At the same time, I do agree there's nothing like having daughters to make one a cultural conservative. Beyond "refusing and resisting" in one's own life, there's the job of teaching children to cast their own critical eye on their own culture--"Tell me what they did to you (in school, on TV, etc. etc.) today, dear.">

rebeccat
December 6, 2006 2:02 AM

This reminds me of a story about some shop in malls that catered to little girls and offered dress-up sessions, manicure, make-up and such. The options provided were pretty much scantchy ho and rock star scantchy ho. while the little girls were largely oblivious to the sexual nature of their dress-up items girls a bit older (say 9-10 rather than 4-5) were rapidly becoming aware of the idea of beauty being tied to base sexuality and it's use in attracting attention. So while the parents of the 4-5 year old girls would say, "oh they're just playing dress-up. They're just having fun and it doesn't mean anything to them" the results as they got older were quite obvious. It's like what I was told growing up "if you start kissing in the 4th grade it may well be innocent, but what are you going to be doing in the 10th grade?"
The fact of the matter is that little girls who really just want to play dress up or have dolls to act out stories with are perfectly happy to dress up like Laura Ingals Wilder and use stuffed animals to do so. There's just no reason to bring sexualized attire or toys into the picture. And the shopping thing - good lord! We're indoctrinating them earlier and earlier to be good Americans and find joy in the aquisition of stuff. Sad, sad, sad.>

harvey lacey
December 6, 2006 2:16 AM
http://www.harveylacey.com

Once again I see people underestimating the power of a parent and over estimating the power of the media.

You want to know what destroys a girls potential as a human being and inspires her to settle for being a sex object?

I believe dad has a ton to do with it. Dad not being exclusive to father in this instance.

Dad's with his six year old at the grocery market. He sees a nice looking woman dressed like a professional. "Look dahlin', I bet she's a lawyer" he tells his daughter. "When you grow up you can be a lawyer too if you go to school and study hard."

About that time an over developed fifteen year old walks by falling out all over. Only a little cloth covers the her future and past and there's cleavage into next week.

Dad almost breaks his neck spinning to stare and daughter's arm gets dislocated in the process.

Now what has dad just taught his daughter?

How about the way to get dad's attention is to go slutty?

I have a story about learning. It's personal but that doesn't stop it from being universal.

In my forties in a reflective moment I figured out where I got my work ethic and desire to be faster while doing better than my peers.

It came from sitting at the supper table and dad talking about the men he worked with. There was respect and admiration for those that were clever and worked harder than anyone else. There wasn't respect in his voice when he discussed men who didn't care or carry their share.

About the time I realized that I understood that I'd had what I wanted most since I was in my twenties. I had my father's respect.

I don't believe I'm that much different from Rod. Sure he's thinner, paid more per word, and he goes to church more often than I do. But he learned his life lessons just like the rest of us. His kids will too.

People complain about the kids of today. They say they're lazy. Could it have anything to do with dad and mom complaining all the time about working for nothing?

People complain about kids disrespecting older adults. Could listening to parents cuss and complain about old people driving or walking too slow while shopping?

People complain about kids being too thing oriented. Could it be because they hear their parents praise those with and discredit those without?

It isn't about the media folks. It's about the power a parent exerts in conversation.

My best advice to parents is to assume they've got a video crew following them seven twenty four. Because they do.>

Stefanie
December 6, 2006 2:41 AM

Lileks: Bratz are the main reason I do not keep a supply of bricks around the house, because everytime the commercials come on I wish to pitch something kiln-fired through the screen...

Who turned on the TV? It didn't fire up all by itself...>

watsy
December 6, 2006 3:10 AM

Watsy - seriously, listen to yourself.
Teach that to your kids. "Here, sweetie, this is how you insult someone without saying anything."

My girls had a little friend over and she's not permitted to watch the Bratz. My girls wanted to show her a Bratz video. I told them to go find something else to play. The little girl said, "I can watch it. As long as I don't tell my Mom, it will be OK."

I've checked them out. We've had discussions about the shopping (Have you noticed that the Bratz never pay for anything that they buy? Do you really think that shopping is the best way to make yourself feel better? Do you really think shopping solves problems? What kinds of problems can shopping create? Can you think of better ways to spend money?) Amazing conversations.

Or, I could just call tell my daughter that they're Slutz and Hooker Dollz and have them wondering why Mom would say something so awful when they do watch a video at a friends and only see 4 good friends solving problems and being best friends.>

sigaliris
December 6, 2006 4:33 AM

Great post, harvey lacey. I agree with you.

Franklin, you said
"if you shudder at the thought of a predator getting his or her hands on your child, why in the name of every god would you dress your child to be a tempting target? Do you really want every adult male who sees your daughter to be attracted to her?"

My sisters and my daughters, when young, have all been the recipients of unwanted attention from adult men without having dressed as tempting targets or done anything else to attract such attention. News flash: all one must do to become a target is be female. I assume your rather euphemistic to be attracted to does not mean something harmless like to think she is pretty but more like to want sex with her. I hope you don t really mean that it would be only natural for every adult male who sees your daughter to want sex with her, if she were dressed in an age-inappropriate fashion. I wish we could assume that every adult male knows it is wrong to want sex with a child NO MATTER HOW SHE IS DRESSED.

For men who really want their daughters to be treated with respect, I suggest they focus less on controlling the viewing and dressing habits of little girls, and more on controlling their own behavior and that of their fellow men. Face it, women can wear burqas and still be the targets of demeaning behavior from men. It isn t our habits of dress or the dolls we play with that need to change. It s the attitudes adult men have toward girls and women.>

Erik
December 6, 2006 5:12 AM
http://dawnpiper.livejournal.com

sigilaris,
For men who really want their daughters to be treated with respect, I suggest they focus less on controlling the viewing and dressing habits of little girls, and more on controlling their own behavior and that of their fellow men.

It's hardly an either/or proposition... I do model respect for women in my own behavior, and I am also teaching my daughter that she deserves to be treated with respect, and to treat HERSELF AND others the same way.

GOM,
Listening to them play with the Barbies, it became quite clear that they were working out their own ideas through play. Some of the stuff they came up with was worthy of an O'Neill drama, and had nothing to do with what the Mattel marketing department thought girls are interested in.

Yes, but the medium - if not actually the message - does have an effect on the type of play that gets enacted... I've seen it at work in my own family and others.

watsy,
Aspiring to look like a Bratz doll will not be a goal.

Ya don't think so? Good luck with that.

The little girl said, "I can watch it. As long as I don't tell my Mom, it will be OK."

So, did you let her watch it? Teach *that* to your kids...

Until this thread, I didn't even know they had a cartoon - my estimation of the Bratz is based entirely on seeing the dolls in the store.>

Erik
December 6, 2006 5:24 AM
http://dawnpiper.livejournal.com

Oh, and to put this convo into a little perspective...

Rod said, If there is a children's toy more odious than the slutty Bratz dolls, I don't want to know about it...

Well cover your eyes, cause here it is:
http://www.pzg.biz/figure_hitler.htm

(OK, strictly speaking this is a collectible action figure rather than a child's toy, but still... there it is. A lot of it. A really scary amount of it.)>

sigaliris
December 6, 2006 1:03 PM

No, it's not an either/or proposition, and you'll note I didn't say either/or, but less/more. My point is twofold:

1. Your daughter will be disrespected by men, flagrantly and repeatedly, throughout her lifetime, regardless of what she says or does. It would be pretty to think that, as a society, we've gotten past that, but we haven't.

2. Waxing indignant over toys and cartoons, while it is a pleasant pastime that I've indulged in myself often enough, will do very little to change that. I didn't give my children Barbies, and I wouldn't give them Bratz. Watsy would, yet she sounds like a pretty good mom to me. Either way, it does not matter. The effect of the Bratz/no Bratz controversy on the place of women in society will be zip. Zero.

My daughter didn't play with Barbies or dress like Bratz. She respects HERSELF all right--yet she has been molested, accosted, hollered at from car windows, groped on the bus. If you want your daughter to escape the same indignities, teaching her to be a "good girl" and turning off the TV isn't going to cut it. You're going to have to change your fellow men.>

Eric
December 6, 2006 1:40 PM

Some people keep stating that we should just unplug the television. That's nice. I don't even have a TV except to watch movies.

But...has anybody noticed how certain channels have cut out parts of movies that would have offensive phrases to gays or sexual scenes that may be offensive to women? I remember distinctly in the movie "High Plains Drifter" there was a scene where a woman first resisted Clint Eastwood's advances but then succombed. It has been totally cut out for television viewing.

Most logical people realize that this is probabl a good thing because it probably reinforces the false idea of "no means yes", or something to that effect.

Why people can't see the same thing when sleazy things are marketed to their little girls is beyond me.

I agree people should not overestimate the power of the media. But even if you do turn off the TV, nobody lives in a vacuum. Kids go to school, and the children whose parents do let them be exposed to this stuff will affect the environment in which a kid spends most of his day.

Eric>

watsy
December 6, 2006 2:05 PM

So, did you let her watch it? Teach *that* to your kids..

No, Eric. We had a conversation about what it is about the Bratz that the little girl's mom doesn't like. She didn't know what her Mom didn't like. I told them what she probably didn't like because I didn't like it either. THEN, I told them how important it is to respect our parents when we leave the house by respecting their rules.

Good posts, sigaliris.

Actually, my girls don't have a Bratz doll. They have a video that they watch now and then. They have 2 books that I read to them. Their favorite Bratz activity is to color pictures that I copy from a web site. They talk as they color and turned them into a book.

They like the "Best Friends" dolls. Grieling is right. It's all about the hair. Those dolls have big heads and big feet and dress better than the Bratz with less glamour. But they have GREAT hair for combing and styling.

Play does sometimes imitate the Bratz. It can be eye opening. One day they were pretending that they were on their cell phones. They were being rather mean to the person at the other end.
I asked, "Who are you talking to?"
Daughter A said, "Our boyfriends."
I said, "Why are you being so mean to your boyfriends?"
Daughter A said, "They want us to do drugs. We don't do drugs. They aren't going to be our boyfriends if they try to make us do drugs."

This mornings conversation with Daughter B.
B:"Mom, can I adopt a baby without getting married?"
Me: "It's best to have a husband when you have a baby. Why do you ask? Do you want a baby but not a husband?"
B: She nods
Me: "Why don't you want a husband?"
B: "Because you have to do that thing."
Me: "What thing? Kissing?"
B: "Yes. And you know where(she's making a face).
Me: "On the lips?"
B: "Yes. It's disgusting(making a really sick face)."
Me: "Let's wait and see. You might not think it's disgusting when you're 20."
B: Big smile and gives me a hug>

Erica R Shier
December 6, 2006 2:10 PM

But what if your little girl wants that stuff? I'm being facetious; I know what you'd do. I think this entry is another example of your weird obsession with purity-- whether it's religion, sex, food, etc. How do you keep yourself so much purer than thou?
Anonymous | 12.05.06 - 1:31 pm | #


Kids want lots of stuff that just plain isn't good for them. Given the choice, my kids would stuff themselves with junk food and refuse their vegetables. Should I just let them because that's what they want?? Of course not. I am their mother and it is my job to raise them in a healthy manner. Likewise, since I believe that Bratz is a terrible example for my daughter of what it means to be a little girl, I don't allow her to play with the dolls or watch the show. SHe wants to... many of her friends do, but if it comes on TV she'll immediately jump up and turn it off. She's only 5, so I have simply told her they're not appropriate and have offered little explanation (that will come soon).

Frankly, I think the attitude of "I want it, therefore I should have it" is one of the major problems in our society today. It seems we simply lack the ability to control our impulses and consider consequences. Then we complain about being in debt, overweight and generally out of control. Teaching our children self-control and discernment is vitally important if we want them to be well-adjusted adults some day.>

harvey lacey
December 6, 2006 2:29 PM
http://www.harveylacey.com

Siglaris I do believe you've cut to the chase on this one.

One of the problems with the religious perspective on this issue is they give lust an undeserved power over mankind. Of course we're known less for our allies and more for our enemies. So I guess glorifying the power of lust escalates our own reputation if we don't succumb to it, right?

Traditionally the religious perspective always puts the onus on the woman. The man was just being a man and when she revealed an eyelash it released the beast in him.

We can look at the Islamic policy of total coverage of the female body. It's just an extreme version of what's being advocated here. The other extreme of course would not be total nudity. The opposite of the burqa would be sensual nudity.

Aren't we assuming the same position as the Islamic fundamentalist that Rod so loves to hate when we suggest that it's the woman's fault?

Siglaris is right. The attitude of men is what we're needing to change instead of the attitudes of the women. Well, kinda sorta, every one of these men have women in their lives that evidently reinforced the concept of it being the woman's fault. Men aren't raised in a vacuum.

One of the things I love to point out about self esteem is how and where we get it. We get it from the mirror that is the faces of those we interact with. We search others faces and make a decision about our status by their reaction to us.

Invariably the parent with the brat in the grocery store allows bratting one oh one because correcting the child might affect their self esteem.

That's cart before the horse logic one oh one and two oh two.

The brat gets disapproving looks from every adult within two blocks. The child is getting feedback that they're bad. And since they haven't been corrected they're not sure why they're bad. They're just bad.

The child that is well behaved will be swamped with approval. Adults of every stage of adulthood will complement the parent and the child repeatedly and often.

That's the horse before the cart logic alive and well, hugs too.

If that works for little kids then why can't we use the same concept for older ones?

Let's say Rod is at Whole Foods with the boys and one of the wannabes from just outside of Highland Park comes by with enough silicone to stock two Home Depots and enough Botox to plug a rip in Hoover Dam.

Rod has the perfect opportunity to teach his boys one of the most important lessons of all. He ignores her. After all, she's went through all that modification for attention. The appropriate response is to ignore her. When the boy turns to stare in amazement, not sexual interest, just pure disbelief of those proportions. Rod scolds the child about staring at people who are handicapped. It isn't polite.

The same discussions and reactons should occur everytime the boys are with Rod and exposed to examples of self mutilation or other inappropriate personal expressions intended only for the sake of shocking bystanders. It's not about bad or evil. It's about being handicapped.

I know it's unfair to the handicapped as we usually categorize them. But in fact it's the same thing. People alter their body or act trashy not because they're evil or bad. But because they either don't or are incapable of understanding what they're doing. They're handicapped.

Another thing while I'm at it, I'm home sick, double doggone darn sinus infection. We have to remember that there are tipping points for all of life's lessons. Our attitudes about sex comes early on. Waiting until a child is in puberty to teach lessons on sexuality is comparable to charging that rip in the Hoover Dam with only a hypodermic full of Botox.

This is not teaching the child about the mechanics of sex. Heck the animals at the zoo get it right with a minimum of practice. We're smarter than that. Mechanics don't need to be taught or discussed. What needs to be taught at the earliest ages is respect and appreciation for people as persons with value. This is the foundation for a healthy attitude towards sex later on because sex is just one facet of us as people. It's a small facet about us when you look at your day and interactions with others.

Unless of course for whatever reason you're handicapped. Then you deserve compassion, not credit.>

Franklin Evans
December 6, 2006 3:11 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Before I go on: yes, I'm being holier than thou when it comes to being a male and interacting with females. I believe I do it better than most men (to the approval of most women), and if you decide that's arrogant... bite me. :) (If you ain't smilin' yet, you may as well skip the rest of this post.)

I strongly disagree that re-educating or "better" educating men is the answer. We've had decades of feminism, expressed in rational ways that cannot be ignored by any thinking man, and I can right now list at least a dozen men who say the words, sincerely even, but will exhibit sexist behavior that their sisters and moms would be enraged over. I have three sisters, and even that extra reinforcement has not prevented me from ogling the sexy blonde across the way, or fantasizing about the coworker two cubicles down.

The difference is in how well, and how convincing we are in our sincerity, we express our respect for women. No one, including the most die-hard feminist (well, there may be a few I'm wrong about) wants all sexual behavior to stop or be so rigidly controlled that it couldn't possibly happen unless a woman gave her explicit permission for it.

The reality is that when I look at a woman, one of my thought trains will be about sex. It will become the main train according to circumstances that make it appropriate, but it never goes away. My job is to make sure that 1) I know what appropriate circumstances means (often a moving target, but not really that hard to pin down); 2) I treat every woman with the respect with which I want to be treated.

Society has it in for men. I mean that seriously. Society dictates that women are always advertising sex. It pervades our advertising, our clothing habits, our use of cosmetics, and the only thing more pervasive than violence in popular entertainment is sex with women as the objects. Women can help (though I remain skeptical on how much good it can do, as illustrated by the experience of siglaris' daughter, and my own daughters and sisters as well) by doing two things: rebel against the clothing and cosmetics imposition of sexual signals and dress that way deliberately and only when you intend to send that signal; give the men in your lives a bit of a break and try to be patient with them. If we argue about every other point, one thing remains true: it just ain't like flipping a switch.>

watsy
December 6, 2006 3:12 PM

Harvey is correct. It's not OK to disrespect a person if she looks like a slut or a hooker. We teach our boys and girls that if they look the right way, then they deserve our respect. If not, we can call them Slutz or Hooker Dollz and throw them into the trash.

Jesus saw the inner pain of Slutz and Hooker Dollz and showed compassion. I like to think that Jesus has a sense of humor and could handle, "You're stylin, girlfriend." But, maybe not.

I don't think that we're disagreeing as to what's good or bad for kids. I think that we're disagreeing as to how to handle it.

Dale Price turns off the tv. That will work for a little. I think that it would be more effective to watch the commercials, and then say, "I don't like that commercial. I think that girls should show more respect for themselves by wearing more clothes. I think that girls look pretty when they look natural(less makeup)and behave pretty(with kindness towards others).

I agree with Erica's post.>

Philip Mitchell
December 6, 2006 3:36 PM

I haven't had time to read the comboxes much these days, but this is an issue in our home. I have a soon to be 7-year-old daughter and a 3-year-old daughter. We have a no-Bratz and no-Barbie rule in our house, though we've hardly been consistent since we've allowed Polly Pockets. My older daughter once used her allowance to buy a Barbie behind our backs with her grandfather. We ended up having a long talk before we returned it, talking about the nature of dress and what people shuld spend their lives doing for others. She checked out a Barbie book from the local library, so we sat down and compared it with another picture book she had (All the PLaces I Love) and talked about the differences in what the people were doing and how they were drawn. The later book has beutiful art work whcih portrays a farm family of several generations.

Lately, the girls have gotten into American Girls--now, we don't have lots of money, so we've gone in for the smaller figures, the books, and the videos. If you can swing these, they are worth the investment. The girls in the series are real historical figures with thoughtful stories that have kept both my daughters interested.

Philip Mitchell>

watsy
December 6, 2006 3:51 PM

Good points, Franklin. I was LOL when I got to your smiley face, so I felt pretty confident that I could handle the rest of it.

I don't believe that society has it in for men. I do think that a lot of men make a lot of money by sexually exploiting women in the music and entertainment industry. Women are adults and choose to let it happen because they make a lot of money.

Girls do need to know that men don't think like women. I haven't had those conversations with my daughters because they are too innocent and don't have the background knowledge to understand.

But my girls think that women who wear makeup and jewlery are pretty. I don't wear it often. My daughters always comment when I do because they say I look prettier when I do. They don't understand why I would choose not to look prettier. I have pierced ears and haven't had earrings in my ears since they were born. They want to have pierced ears & can't understand why I don't wear beautiful earrings.

Girls want to be pretty. I could talk until I'm blue in the face and look at every glamour doll out there and say, "That's really ugly." They would say, "I think it's beautiful." If I got indignant enough, they'd simply stop sharing their opinion of beauty and conversation would stop. It doesn't mean that their opinions would change.>

watsy
December 6, 2006 4:11 PM

I'm curious as to what Christians think of Beth Moore. She's a Christian evangelist that ministers to women. She dresses like a professional lady(with a wardrobe that I can only envy)& always has great hair, jewelry, and makeup.

Is it OK to teach our children that looking pretty and modern is OK as long as we're talking about Jesus, or must a woman look like she still lives on the prairie to be OK?

I'm thinking that this could be a marketing opportunity. Beth Moore dolls. They are pretty. They wear makeup and jewelry. They dress nicely. They wouldn't have to cost the same as an American Girl doll. They'd be affordable for all. Would that be OK or does she have to be a plain Jane?>

Franklin Evans
December 6, 2006 4:11 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Watsy, my friend... you are a woman, and not accorded an opinion in this: the dead weight of the male hands of patriarchy over many centuries dictates that women are sexual objects, and that men are to compete for them in any way necessary and possible. (Keep smiling; I am.)

We have come a very long way since women-as-chattel, bride prices and dowry, marriage as succession and male-only property rights. But when it comes to sexual behavior and expectations, all of that is superficial and has not been enough to change the basic fact: women are forced* to conform with concepts of appearance that have at their root how a woman will look to the sexual eye of a male. That is the crux of this discussion and Rod's original complaint. Yes, girls grow up to be women to at some point they will start having sex; no, girls should not be made into sexual creatures before they actually have the body parts and functions that qualify them as sexual creatures. Our society bulldozes right over the reality of physical and emotional development and instead convinces the parents with words like self-esteem and "sassy" that it is a Good Thing for an 11-year-old to look like a sexual athlete. And, by extension, for a 16-year-old to look like she just had an orgasm and is ready right now for the next one. Let us not bandy words and suffer with euphemisms. These are my daughters we are talking about, and if I cannot muster the outrage this deserves, then I do not deserve to be a father.

* Women who refuse to conform, besides getting the applause of the rare man like me, find themselves somewhere on the scale that ramps up to "man-hating dyke". They are accused of hating themselves, hating their femininity, or being afraid of their sexuality, all in the service of men who want them sexually but expect to fail... and they can't tolerate failure, even if it would all just be in their imaginations.>

watsy
December 6, 2006 4:12 PM

Oh, forgot the link for a quick picture.

http://www.christianbook.com/Christian/Books/cms_content?page=47359&sp=1010&p=1018818

She's tall and thin, too. Keeps in shape because she's an aerobics instructor.>

ottodittometoo
December 6, 2006 4:22 PM

Your child is an infant - enjoy her as she is now!

Teach your sons not to be disrespectful of the girls who choose to model "Bratz" behavior - they are still human and so, worthy of respect - even if they have little self-respect. They may not have any better example of behavior to model.

My beautiful 16 year old daughter is an incredible person. She always has been, but there was that stage that she went through where she truly believed that she was being abused by the fact that she lived in the country and could not participate in the daily mall visits that her school chums in the city could or make it to every single slumber party.

It was a struggle in forth and fifth grade and then into middle school. I banned the Disney channel from my mom's house (she had cable - we still do not) because of Brittany Spears and the Spice Girls etc. The whining about needing clothes from "Limited Too" was just totally unexpected and annoying. She once explained to me that she would like to be first in setting a fashion trend at school instead of having to wait till everything went on sale and was "old".

She had Barbies - tons, and they ended up naked and headless but well played with. I was the very first "Barbie generation" and my sisters and I each had only one Barbie our entire life! My child had tons! But, she has had much more of everything than I did at comparable stages in development.

We moved to a small town because of lifestyle issues. We wanted our children to live a less hectic, less stressful kind of existence - it turned out that in order to get the kind of education we wanted for our children, we had to send them back into the city - but we have so much control over their activities because of the distance. It is a pain to have to chauffer them constantly, but we bought a huge van so I could be the one doing the driving - I always know where they are and who they are with -

(Yes - I know - a helicopter mother - hovering over my children all of the time.)

The values of the people in the school we struggle financially to send them to often clash with ours - the tolerence of teenage drinking, the materialism, the cut throat competition in every aspect of their lives... BUT - our children are getting an excellent education - they are learning to think and they see these people of different values and they are learning to cherish their own.

I am so proud of the choices my teenage daughter makes today - and there were so many moments I dispaired that I would ever be able to impart our values to her when she was a "tween" -

She dresses very modestly but is still fashion forward - she is known as a trend setter at her school and yet she scorns the mall for shopping - and she has come to embrace the concept of a sale - I used to buy at the market in Dallas and ever since my mantra has been "never pay retail" - she makes her own money now babysitting and doing odd jobs - my son was selling pecans this year to augment his meager allowance to buy Christmas presents - and she fully embraces the NEVER PAY RETAIL way of life - she creates looks and makes beautiful one-of-a kind silk screen designs for her t-shirts. She makes certain that a substantial portion of her income goes to causes she cares about like the Savation Army and St Vincent de Paul - I watched her put $20.00 in the red bucket the other day and I knew she had only earned $30.00 from her last babysitting job.

She has decided to be confirmed as a Catholic and she is an apologist for her faith. Ironic, as getting her to church on Sunday and to Confirmation class and Youth Group is always such a struggle - but it is no trouble for her to get up every day in the summer to go to an inner city church to work with the kids on summer tutoring and poetry classes.

Don't dispair - the next generation has incredible people in it - even the "Bratz" girls are often thinking, feeling, giving, kind of people - I have seen this in the group of kids my daughter works with through her "Big Buddy" program of peotry writing and performing -

Many of the girls are living, breathing, speaking, "Bratz" - bling bling and sas - sey... Their normal mode of speach sounds totally ridiculous to my ear - but the poetry they create with the mentoring - they are growing out of being rapper wanna bes and are making some powerful poetry - learning to express their humanity.

There is much to hope for in this geneneration.>

watsy
December 6, 2006 4:31 PM

Franklin,
I can't disagree with anything that you say. However, most women want to be attractive to men.(We're talking men and women, now, and not girls). Most women who don't want to be appealing to men and go out of there way to be unattractive to men are dykes. It's the rare man who finds a dyke-looking woman to be attractive. I'm not saying that they aren't out there. Everyone has their particular tastes and fetishes. But heterosexual women who want men to think that they are attractive don't go out of their way to look like a man because it doesn't get them what they want. What they want is not to get laid, but to be perceived as being attractive.

Teens are different. They want to be attractive, but they need parental guidelines. Some of the Bratz outfits are acceptable. Some aren't. That might be a starting point for conversation.

Girls are different. They don't want to be attractive to boys. They want to be pretty. What they consider to be pretty will change as they grow and develop, but as a young girl, tacky princess stuff is pretty. The Bratz are pretty. Barbie is pretty. Telling them it's not pretty doesn't make them think that it's not pretty. That will come with maturity.

Women know how to make themselves look pretty without looking trashy.>

watsy
December 6, 2006 5:05 PM

I'm not a helicopter, Otto. But I really like your thinking and attitude.>

Karen LH
December 6, 2006 6:20 PM

Regarding Watsy's and Franklin's exchange, I think that part of the problem is that, because men and women are wired differently, what looks pretty/attractive to a woman often looks seductive to a man.

Sometimes it's surprising what falls into that divide. There is a Washington Post columnist who, in a moment of madness a few years ago, opined that women wear wraparound skirts in order to be seductive (because of the way they behave in a breeze). It's a wonder the poor man didn't spontaneously combust from the livid email that he received.

Anyway, I get the impression that the Bratz dolls (and the little girls who are dressing like them) don't look pretty so much as they look sexy. At least to the men. And that's wholly inappropriate, especially at that age.>

harvey lacey
December 7, 2006 2:26 PM
http://www.harveylacey.com

Watsy and Franklin, I think you're wrong. Women don't dress up for men. They dress up for women.

I think it starts with those damn dolls. LOL>

harvey lacey
December 7, 2006 2:37 PM
http://www.harveylacey.com

Anyway, I get the impression that the Bratz dolls (and the little girls who are dressing like them) don't look pretty so much as they look sexy. At least to the men. And that's wholly inappropriate, especially at that age.
Karen LH


Karen, those little girls dress up reflects the self image of their mothers. As long as women buy into the image is everything and sexy image is more we're going to have this.>

Erik
December 7, 2006 3:41 PM
http://dawnpiper.livejournal.com

watsy,
Sorry for the delay, I was offline yesterday. Glad to hear you didn't let her watch the video - it wasn't clear from your post.

sigilaris,
The problem is that *I* can't change my fellow men - they have to change themselves. What I *can* do is myself "be the change I want to see", as they say, and raise my daughter with the necessary mental and emotional equipment to make wise and rational choices when her time comes.

Ultimately, whether my daughter plays with Bratz dolls or not, taken as a stand-alone decision point, probably wouldn't make much of a difference in the outcome of her life - but viewed as a part of our entire child-rearing pattern, I think it's important to the consistency of the whole.>

Franklin Evans
December 7, 2006 4:17 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Harvey, I understand your point, but consider this: talk to any woman of our generation who grew up with Barbie and they will tell you that in hindsight, the impossible waist and bosom of the doll did more to damage their self-esteem once they realized that Barbie is what men want, and no woman not born that way can ever look that way without unreasonable and usually painful methods and artifacts.

Then look at the multi-billion dollar markets centered on those unreasonable and usually painful methods and artifacts. Tell me that is sane. Go ahead, I'm listening.

:(

P.S. No, I'm not suggesting Barbie is a cause. It is a symptom.>

sigaliris
December 8, 2006 10:04 PM

"sigilaris,
The problem is that *I* can't change my fellow men - they have to change themselves."

Respectfully, Franklin, I disagree. Men shape male culture. Whose responsibility is it, if not yours? If nothing else, recognizing male violence against women as a serious problem and speaking of it as such would help at least to some extent.

You say that you're trying to model good behavior, and I believe you. But I don't think that's enough. Isn't that kind of like a German saying "Well, I myself would never harm a Jew, but if the SS choose to beat them up, what am I supposed to do about it?" I'm sure most of the men here are well-intentioned and would never do anything to harm women overtly, but when one man does demean a woman, there are usually other men around who witness but do nothing. I'm just saying those guys need to start speaking up.

When I was walking to the library with my little sister, and a drunken man grabbed my arm and started trying to drag me into the bushes, it was broad daylight. There were men walking by, all around. Did any of them stop to extricate me from my predicament? Nope. When a kid high on acid at a party started beating up my sister, did the other boys step in and restrain him? No. I had to do that myself. When a corporate lawyer at my place of employment made a practice of harassing all the secretarial staff, did the other executives put a stop to his shameful behavior? No, they looked the other way because he was clever and popular. When degrading jokes are made about women, when vile innuendos are blogged about female politicians, when appearance is made the criterion for judgment of women who are public figures, do most of the men hanging around speak up and say, "Shut up! That's not funny!" Not too darn often, I'd say.

That's the kind of thing I'm talking about. And I think it's just fine that you choose the toys at your house. I'm in favor of that. But when you talk about the multi-million dollar "beauty" industry and the harm it does women--and I agree with you there, too--I think of another multi-million dollar industry that has done women a lot more harm than Barbie ever will: the porn industry. You say that Barbie hurt women's self-estemm, "once they realized that Barbie is what men want." Huh?? It IS? All men? Really . . . I hadn't known that. Well, if true, how did that happen? It wasn't little boys who were indoctrinated by Barbie. I think they must have received their information elsewhere! I think it would be great if men who don't want Barbie organized a mass movement to say to porn producers, "You don't speak for us! That is not what we think of when we think of women!" I don't think you can say you can't change your fellow men till you've given it a good try.>

Franklin Evans
December 9, 2006 1:56 AM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

Sigaliris, I don't have any good answers to your excellent challenges. I share your view, implied strongly, that we live in a society whose basic morals are declining or gone. I often refer to it as the death of courtesy. It is a small thing, holding the door for the next person behind me, or refraining from blocking a sidewalk such that a person in a wheelchair has to go into the street or just sit there waiting, or being aware of the noise level I am creating and toning it down before the neighbors complain. But all of those little things and more have been forcibly removed from our culture, to the point where it is rude to point out rudeness in others.

It angers me reading your personal examples. If I had been present, people would have ended up in the hospital and I would have been arrested.

It outrages me that you would think to say to me something like I don't think you can say you can't change your fellow men till you've given it a good try. [By the way, I did not write what you are responding to at the beginning of your post.] My outrage is assuredly not directed at you, but at a society that in fact denies any attempt by one person to chastise another for unethical behavior. You don't know me, so you couldn't know that I try to change my fellow males every day, and fail miserably with every one of the many variations I try.

So, I am left with only one alternative: being a role model for what is right, and awaiting my chance for a catastrophe to touch the idiots in a personal way which I can reinforce by rubbing their faces in it. In my cynical view, nothing short of that will get any results.

I don't mean "all men" in my Barbie point; I do mean that girls are encouraged to believe that it actually is all men. Nothing sells like blind belief. :-(>

sigaliris
December 9, 2006 2:47 AM

Franklin, my apologies for misquoting you. I see that it was Erik I should have addressed in responding to that comment.

Thank you for your kind response. It actually brought tears to my eyes, which I guess shows how uncommon it is for me to encounter a man who does what you do. Thank you for your efforts. I do understand your feeling that, try as you may, you can't make a dent! I can see from what you say that you really have tried. Me too--and I often beat myself up for not trying harder, so it's not as if I have the right to sit in judgment on others for a fault I don't admit to myself.

Thanks for clarifying your Barbie comment. You're right--the Barbie look is part of the endless barrage of propaganda to make girls feel they don't measure up. If you can't change the world outside, protecting your own as well as you can is also a good and noble endeavor. Good luck to your family.>

Erik
December 10, 2006 3:54 AM
http://dawnpiper.livejournal.com

Sigilaris,
By my comment I was not advocating a laissez-faire attitude to discrimination and threatening/violent behavior on the part of other men - I'm perfectly happy to call someone down if I think they deserve it, or to intervene if someone needs help. However, at the end of the day I'm in the same position Franklin describes - So, I am left with only one alternative: being a role model for what is right, and awaiting my chance....

...and helping to create a world in which the sort of behavior you describe is both less likely and less acceptable, by teaching my daughter what sort of behavior I believe she should view as acceptable toward herself, and modeling proper behavior for the boys and young men in my life (church, family, etc.)

Ultimately, though, I believe my point still stands - I can lecture boors all day long, or pound creeps in alleyways, but until they take it upon themselves to change themselves, it ain't a-gonna happen.>

Franklin Evans
December 11, 2006 2:48 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

sigaliris, it's all good and all fodder for this excellent discussion. If I'd had a problem with your misattribution, I'd have worded my post differently. As I wrote, you make excellent challenges.

Erik, it's usually impossible to know if "now" is the right moment, but I have witnessed some distinct changes in people who observed someone like you or I do some lecturing or pounding. I guess I'm thinking we just have to be reconciled to not seeing larger changes in our lifetimes; but we shouldn't despair, we shouldn't give up letting our examples include getting ourselves into some trouble as a result. For some people, our investment is what gets them to decide to make a similar investment, because they finally realize that regardless of the local results, the investment is worth it.

Of course, my wife and children would be mortified if I were arrested... but that's a different story, eh? :)>

Erik
December 11, 2006 3:35 PM
http://dawnpiper.livejournal.com

Franklin,
Yep, large-scale changes commonly come in generations, not years... but they don't come at all if we don't act like they should be happening today.

And I *think* that my wife would be proud of me if I got arrested doing the right thing. At least I hope so! :)>

Franklin Evans
December 12, 2006 4:34 PM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

I have a mental image of the end of the American remake of "Godzilla" with Mathew Broderick. The wife of the TV cameraman (Hank Azaria) is watching the finale on TV in her home; she's cheering and clapping, sees him on the screen, and continuing her activity says, "That's my husband! I'm gonna kill him!"

:)>

gosha
February 13, 2009 5:14 AM
http://msn.com

FtyCSI hi! http://msn.com my site

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.