Crunchy Con

Party girls

Tuesday December 5, 2006

Meanwhile, in a Slate piece today, Michael Kinsley praises George W. and Laura Bush for keeping their twin girls, Jenna and Barbara, out of the media spotlight, and he agrees that now that the girls are adults, you can't blame their parents for how they behave.

Nevertheless, there is a war on. It's a war that has killed 3,000 Americans, most of them around Jenna and Barbara's age or younger. It has killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis of all ages. And even more Americans and Iraqis have been injured, lost limbs, suffered excrutiating pain. President Bush can be quite eloquent in talking about the sacrifices of American soldiers and—he always adds—their families. In the Reagan style that has become almost mandatory, he uses anecdotes. He talks of Marine 2nd Lt. Frederick Pokorney Jr.: "His wife, Carolyn, received a folded flag. His two-year old daughter, Taylor, knelt beside her mother at the casket to say a final goodbye." And of Staff Sgt. Lincoln Hollin, who "in his last letter home from the Middle East … said how much he appreciated getting mail from his family. He added, 'I wish my truck and boat knew how to write.' "

Bush says truly, about the American dead, "They did not yearn to be heroes. They yearned to see mom and dad again and to hold their sweethearts and to watch their sons and daughters grow. They wanted the daily miracle of freedom in America, yet they gave all that up and gave life itself for the sake of others."

Living your life according to your own values is a challenge for everyone, and must be a special challenge if you happen to be the president. No one thinks that the president should have to give up a child to prove that his family is as serious about freedom as these other families he praises. But it would be reassuring to see a little struggle here—some sign that the Bush family truly believes that American soldiers are dying for our freedom, and it's worth it. Who knows? Maybe they have had huge arguments about this. Maybe George and Laura wanted the girls to join the Red Cross, or the Peace Corps, or do something that would at least take them off the party circuit for a couple of years. And perhaps the girls said no. But I doubt this scenario, don't you?


Yep. It seems to me that were their father the president during World War II, the Bush twins would have felt obliged to have spent their time serving in some useful capacity doing charity work with the Red Cross, working in military hospitals, something. Anything. Noblesse oblige, you know. Nobody expects them, or should expect them, to put on uniforms, but doing something other than being jet-set party Bratz when other people's children are coming home in pine boxes or paralyzed and maimed is the least these two privileged young women could do. The very least.
Advertisement
Comments
Anonymous
December 7, 2006 3:24 AM

Can't Rod be bothered to do five minutes of research before he slings accusations around?

James, all you have to do is read the DMN and you will know he does nothing remotely resembling research. It gives new meaning to the term "creative writing.">

Maureen
December 7, 2006 5:39 PM
http://marialectrix.wordpress.com

The girls and their friends also made the pilgrimage to Compostela after they graduated from college. On foot.

Oh, yeah, they're such party girls. So thoughtless and frivolous.>

James Kabala
December 7, 2006 6:18 PM

Anonymous: As you are probably Jonathan Carpenter, please refrain from seconding my thoughts. Occasional exasperation with Rod's tendency to shoot first, ask questions later is not the same as having it pathologically in for him.
Maureen: Is that for real or a joke?>

god-is-in-the-tv
December 7, 2006 6:33 PM

Huh?

Sorry David - it was a Brat-ism ;)

See, that guy made some snide comment about 99% of Americans not doing jack for the war effort, and you countered with the zinger about 99% of American's not having a daddy that trumped up a war.

In some circles, that would be worthy of a "snap!" as in ... "ooooh he shore told you!"


Humor just doesn't translate well in text ;)>

Anonymous Also
December 7, 2006 11:29 PM

"Humor just doesn't translate well in text" -- GIITTV

No kidding. Senses of humor and perspective would do wonders on this or any other blog, wouldn't it??>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.