Crunchy Con

Well now!

Wednesday December 20, 2006

Turns out that George W. Bush was wrong: there are, in fact, jobs that Americans will do ... if you pay them a decent wage. Seems that Swift & Co., after having been popped by the feds and having much...
Advertisement
Comments
Biblebeliever
December 20, 2006 9:33 PM

Actually the more people who make DECENT wages, the more that CAN afford the meat, or any other products.

These companies that are outsourcing for cheap labor and hiring illegal immigrants--suppressing US wages and more are so short-sighted its disgusting. If there is no middle class left, who will be able to afford their products? {This is even worse for those who make non-necessary items}>

HARRIS
December 20, 2006 9:40 PM

The story is incomplete without also understanding the union-busting that was part of the meatpacking industry of the 90s. These were once well-paying jobs (ask around Iowa), but the decision to reduce costs by taking it out on the worker of course led to a flight to the bottom. Sadly.>

ML
December 20, 2006 9:52 PM

"We should all pay what things are worth?" That's funny. If you have "illegal" workers who are more than happy to work for $20 a day, then why should Swift&Co be required to pay more for "legal" workers? Sorry Crunchy, but I'm not "buying" it.>

Biblebeliever
December 20, 2006 9:54 PM

If Swift wants people that can afford their products, then they will pay a fair wage.

I guess when America is a third world nation and no one can afford to eat meat, and Swift goes out of business, I guess then they will learn and you too ML.>

Biblebeliever
December 20, 2006 9:58 PM

How many Mexicans can afford a roast beef dinner or steak every week?

There's a reason that the taquieras even in Chicago serve TRIPE.

Its CHEAP.>

Anthony King
December 21, 2006 12:12 AM
trinitybicycles.com

Rod, you elitist pig. The height of freedom is cheap hormone and antibiotic laden meat produced by low-wage workers sold in big box stores staffed by yet more low-wage workers who are paid so little they must (and are encouraged by their employeers to) supplement their wages with welfare. What do you think our forefathers spilled blood for?

Just trying to get it out of the way.

Remember when cheap was rightly understood to be a pejorative? Cheap goods, cheap labor, cheap sex, cheap life, cheap death--it's all of a piece.>

Susan
December 21, 2006 3:05 AM

If you have "illegal" workers who are more than happy to work for $20 a day, then why should Swift&Co be required to pay more for "legal" workers?

To comply with the law?>

Susan S.
December 21, 2006 3:39 AM

Swift, wchich is highly unionized, was alread paying twice the minimum wage at most of its plants.>

anon
December 21, 2006 7:26 AM

Way to go Swift. I'm not even in the same pay scale range as Mr. Dreher, but I have no problem paying regular prices and will do without if necessary. I used to work in retail and saw that all these twofers ,cheap prices and sales are ultimately paid for by the employees. There's no such thing as a free lunch.>

zx
December 21, 2006 11:41 AM

It's nice to know that just a few raids by the feds is enough to make a company like Swift actually start to obey the law. But I guess that's typical of conservatives and their organizations, isn't it?

As far as cutting back on meat, it probably wouldn't hurt most Americans to cut back on the animal protein. There's evem evidence that vegetarianism isn't as stupid as many may believe: ">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6180753.stm>

Franz
December 21, 2006 12:59 PM

I don't doubt that vegetarianism isn't stupid. It's just that it isn't any fun.>

Sarah (Mrs. Irani)
December 21, 2006 6:44 PM
http://www.SarahHempel.com

I can't decide is Anthony King is being sarcastic or not.

Rod, I don't think you are an elitist pig because you understand the harm that "cheap" meat causes to our environment and our families. There are so many hormones floating around out there that girls are hitting puberty at astonishingly young ages and grown-ups are infertile.

Americans are amazingly fat and eating healthy, grass-fed meat less often than we eat cheapmeat now can only improve things here.>

Biblebeliever
December 21, 2006 7:28 PM

Europe and Canada were smart enough to ban bovine growth hormone, America went the way of corporate profits. Americans in general are getting BIGGER {not just in terms of weight, but in height] and at far faster rates then "better access to food" would explain between generations and through the years. Bovine growth hormone IS affecting this.>

paagle
December 22, 2006 12:07 AM

Vegetarianism isn't as bad as it appears to the typical American. The problem is that most of what we consider vegetarian food is food that is meant to be a side dish for meat, or is a poor substitute of meat. Since becoming married to an Indian I've realized vegetarian food can be very very tasty. They've been eating vegetarian for centuries, and their wide variety of lentils, vegetables, spices and breads make vegetarianism pretty easy. Not that I've gone all the way. I still like meat, but I eat significantly less of it. If thats the price to pay for fair wages and grain-fed hormone free meat, it seems like almost no price at all.>

mlyons619 -- U.S. Politics Boa
December 22, 2006 7:42 PM
http://www.beliefnet.com

From the reading of Rod's blog, this is not about eating less meat and more veggies, this is about whether we as Americans can justify using ILLEGAL workers to keep our grocery bill down

With 20 million illegal aliens now working in the U.S., some will argue that our costs would rise drastically if we were to suddenly start enforcing our immigration laws. Others point to the saving in tax revenues should illegals stop receiving government benefits. And there are those who would point out the HUMAN costs in putting teeth into our immigration laws.

The Beliefnet U.S. Politics Board (http://www.beliefnet.com/boards/discussion_list.asp?boardID=425">) is currently is hosting several debate threads on immigration. They are:

"Hate That Fence"

"Your Country?"

Good Laws & Bad Laws"

"Are Borders "Purist"?"

Readers here are welcome to join the debate.

Thanks,>

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.