Crunchy Con

Educating tomorrow's leaders

Thursday February 8, 2007

A few years ago, I was on a bus in Israel, and struck up a conversation with an American Jew who had moved to Israel to teach in an exchange program at a Palestinian school. It was a post-Oslo program set up to bring Palestinian teachers into Israeli schools, and vice versa, as a way of preparing the kids to live in peace with each other. The American was real down about it. He said that the Palestinian principal at his school had been a good guy, and was genuinely devoted to the program. But the man, who was older, took so much grief from the Palestinian Authority for being friendly to Jews that he keeled over of a heart attack. The PA was not the least bit interested in educating for peace; they wanted to prepare their children for eternal war with the Jews. Check the textbooks out for yourself.

An Iranian dissident is protesting over the Iranian government using the classroom to turn kids into jihadibots. Excerpt:

Textbooks used in Iran's schools are instilling students with hatred toward the West, especially the United States, and urging them to become "martyrs" in a global holy war against countries perceived to be enemies of Islam, a new study says.
An Iranian human rights activist, Ghazal Omid, praised the findings, saying they prove hard-liners in Iran are using the books to turn children into "ticking bombs."

...

"I am an Iranian, a practicing Muslim woman, who sees it as her responsibility to stand up to hard-line Muslims who use Islam to brainwash children of that faith, in particular Iranian children, who the Iranian government is turning into ticking bombs," she said.


Good for her. Some American book critics will probably call her a self-hating Muslim. But good for her. Ah, and did you see the story the other day about the Saudi-funded school in Britain whose textbooks describe Jews and Christians as "apes" and "pigs"? A school official said that people were taking the words "out of context." No, really, he did.
Advertisement
Comments
PG
February 9, 2007 2:05 PM
HASH(0x9416ac8)

The Crunchy Con (CC) laments what he sees as the big problem of Palestinian textbooks reflecting their reality instead of his. If that is a problem then consider the one caused by the educational field trip Israel has imposed on the Pals for the last four decades by holding them captives in or exiled abroad from the land of their births. Predictably, CC sees Pals as the victims of their terrorist selves with the real victims being the long suffering Israeli ethnic cleansers who are forced to hold the Pals in S. African style apartheid. This is the typical world-class cynical hypocrisy of willing enablers. CC's sympathies for the Pals would not pass the laugh test of creditability except among the usual necon, ditto head, Zionist and Christian Zionist suspects.
While CC points to his red herring list of textbooks provided by other serial enablers for the continued injustice that Israel alone is responsible, the honorable President Carter has displayed the moral right stuff. He courageously pinned the apartheid tail on Israel's rotten to the core scheme of apartheid in the world s oldest and largest concentration camps since WWII. Seems the CC is perfectly content with Israel following the same path as the good but silent Germans before them who enabled their infamous leader's pursuit of manifest destiny dreams over lands they occupied for lebenstraum. That is a really ugly comparison indeed but isn't that really what the ongoing Israeli state sponsored settlement activity in the occupied territories and the defacto apartheid scheme to protect the settlements is really all about?
Education is the big problem? The CC has his own education problem that has the distinctive ring of pavlovian pro Israel anti Pal/Muslim agitprop.

watsy
February 9, 2007 3:51 PM
HASH(0x941a820)

Just a few comments. Taken from the article on the study: owever, a U.S. academic who specializes in Iran and Islam, and a former Iranian teacher said they believe the textbooks are a reflection of Iran's history and its deep suspicions of the West, not an effort to turn students into terrorists. and
Shireen T. Hunter, a specialist on Islam and Iran at the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University in Washington, said it was a mistake to portray Iranian textbooks as manuals for creating terrorists. "In some ways, they simply reflect the deep distrust of Third World countries about the policies and motivations of the great powers, which they see as neocolonialist," she said. "When such textbooks promote martyrdom they are referring to the sacrifices needed to defend Iran against foreign enemies as Iraq during the Iraq-Iran war." and n Tehran, Mostafa Mirzaian, an Iranian freelance political researcher who worked as a high school teacher in Iran in the 1980s, agreed. "It is natural that a government, formed after an anti-West revolution and an eight-year war with Iraq, inserts such items in school textbooks," he said. History is always written from the perspective of the person writing the tale. The USA, Iraq, and Israel are not the good guys in Iranian history. And we expect the text books to say differently? I would like to compare teachings of WWII from texts taught in American schools with those taught in Japanese schools. We don't view reality in the same way as most in the Muslim world. We aren't the good guys. Israel isn't the good guy. I would be surprised if the texts described us as benevolent and kindly people considering that we've opposed them in just about every major conflict.
PG, I can see that you have strong feelings towards the Palestinians and against Israel. I haven't read Jimmy Carter's book, but I doubt that he compared the occupied territories to a concentration camp. Before you answer, remember that the Jews in Germany didn't have, nor did they ever use, guns or explosives against the Germans. They went to their deaths naked and with nothing. They could plead for their lives, and despite never harming the Germans in any way, they were killed without mercy. Is that really how you see things in the territories occupied by Israel?

St_Irenaeus
February 9, 2007 7:10 PM
pomoconservative.blogspot.com

Fortress Europe, Fortress America. Birthrates in some places of Europe, by the way, are rebounding (France, of all places -- didn't Rod do a post on that?), and governments are encouraging women to have more babies -- time off, etc. Regardless of the discomfort I feel at socialist governments determining population levels through fiscal policy, people in Europe are seeing it as an issue. I don't think we should remove all Turks from Germany, for instance, but I do think western countries should indeed deport any non-citizen who advocates or supports jihad, violence, etc.
For instance, I saw one of the Danish Cartoon protestors in Britain carrying a sign that said "To Hell with Freedom of Expression." OK, since he doesn't see the irony, we'll follow through on that and kick his bloddy arse out.

Marc
February 9, 2007 9:12 PM
HASH(0x9417ce8)

Watsy, I'm sure PG has a final solution for the Jewish problem in the Middle East.

PG
February 11, 2007 3:39 PM
HASH(0x941e424)

Watsy, Marc Watsy, I appreciate your comments. I was reacting to the blame the victim mentality so popular with Israel s so called friends. Waving the old bloody flag of savagery by native peoples is lame. The history of terrorism is that it is usually a reaction by the oppressed while under the heel of their oppressors. It seems to stop when the oppression ends. America has been down this sorry road before with Native Americans and we should know better that be a party to someone else s latter day injustice to other native peoples.
Ranking the relative merits of old and new injustices seems pointless. All are worthy of condemnation. European Jews suffered a grave injustice that was resolved by the defeat of Germany and the Nuremberg trials. How it happened is a cautionary tale about ignoring injustice. Nazi agitprop conditioned Germans to deny the humanity of Jews and then their lives. Marc, you seem very will conditioned to abandon the Pals as easily as the Germans abandoned Jews. That said I fail to see the relevance of the injustice the Jews suffered in Europe and the Israel holding Pals in the dehumanizing captivity of apartheid. Surely you are not suggesting that because the Holocaust happened, Israel is entitled to be above criticism for their everyday Pal human rights abuses, like collective punishment tactics, bull dozing homes of occupation resistor s relatives, check point deadly force summary injustice, torture tactics etc. Making that argument as an excuse or some sort of mitigating circumstance in the current Israeli Palestinian context would seen to dishonor the universal lesson of the Holocaust which is to not tolerate human rights injustice.
The ultimate power to resolve this particular historic injustice is in the hands Israelis and not the Pals. Israelis will have to satisfy the Pal s sense of justice or the matter will not be settled. The Israeli s say they want peace and security as they try in vain to build walls high enough to protect themselves from the revenge their actions provke. The great Israeli hope must be the Pals will finally tire of being brutalized and humiliated, give up a go quietly to their apartheid reservations surrounded by strategically located Israeli settler surveillance forts. How actual Israeli deeds square with their alleged desire for peace and security is another one of those mysteries of faith held dear by apologists for Israel.
The real irony for Americans is that our craven political leaders actually campaign boasting of their servile fidelity to supporting and funding Israel s morally reprehensible ethnocentric apartheid policies. Such thoroughly un-American policies as Israel practices would not be tolerated in the US for a nanosecond without a tsunami of political and moral outrage. The big payoff for giving Israel an American blank check and a rubber stamp has been to make ourselves their full partners as objects of a world wide pandemic of hatred, in particular among the third that are Muslim. We have not only jeopardized our much larger security interests abroad but we have put own homeland at risk and for what? Israel has never been neither more insecure nor a greater parahia state and more unwilling to resolve the injustice that is at the very core of ME instability. My problem with Israel is they keep electing leaders like iron fisted serial war criminal Sharon and his bungling wannabe, Olmert, grand architect of the highly disrespected Lebanon collective punishment campaign to destroy Lebanon s vital civilian infrastructure. Both men have squandered whatever little was left of the good will Israel once had with the rest of the world. Israelis have only themselves to blame for reelecting men fully committed to the apartheid settlement scheme in the same old historical pattern of slow motion ethnic cleansing behavior.
No better friend of Israel than President Carter yet his honesty has elicited smears and character assassination attempts to silence him. Want to be a better friend of Israel? Insist our elected leaders hold Israel s elected leaders to a much higher standard of morality and commitment to make peace or else. Good people need to stop making excuses for the inexcusable and address the gross injustice before their eyes.
PG

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.