Cardinal Egan of New York, a real class act. I'm in no position to say whether or not the parish should have been closed, but to do it like that? Wow....
Given the justifiably negative press they often get, you'd think the bishops would learn a thing or two about at least appearing to be pastorally sensitive. I guess possessing even a modicum of intelligence is not a prerequisite for prelates...and we're the poorer for it.
mlyons619
February 28, 2007 3:34 AM
HASH(0xaff4744)
I wonder if the Catholic Church is beginning the transition into the Whore of Babylon, as foretold in Revelations. As of late its cardinals, bishops, and priests have not really been acting as God's apostle on Earth. This is just one more example. ;^( -------------------------------------
Goodness I hope Pauli is being sarcastic. That video is so full of s*** it's unbelievable. (and I'm not even Catholic.) Factually speaking, it is not true that "millions" died during the inquisition. An enlightenment myth. As far as the torture of protestants or whatever, we also must remember that if catholic princes/rulers did that to protestants, so to did protestants do that to Catholics. Brutally and in great numbers. So, one could say that the 'martyrs of Jesus' were Catholics. If the Catholic church is the beast/antichrist/woman, etc., why is the Catholic church the one institution in the West (and I guess the Orthodox too) that is reliably pro-life? Just part of the devil's grand strategy of deception? It is very, very bad for one to base one's theology primarily on Revelation. In fact, one of the chief Protestant doctrines of interpretation is that that which is most clear in Scripture is most important, and that which isn't clear ought be left alone. Anyway.
Christine
February 28, 2007 1:54 PM
HASH(0xb02f3a0)
as foretold in Revelations First of all, it's the Book of Revelation, not "Revelations" (or, if you prefer, the Apocalypse) and there ain't no mention of the Catholic Church whasoever. Go back and do some remedial exegesis.
Christine
February 28, 2007 1:56 PM
HASH(0xb02f2bc)
And yes, the way Cardinal Egan handled the closing stinks.
Joel
February 28, 2007 2:59 PM
HASH(0xb030774)
In light of the sex abuse scandal, and various smaller scandals like this one, it baffles me how anyone can still believe in apostolic succession. I don't doubt that people of apostolic caliber are still in the world today, but these clearly are not the people being promoted in the Church.
Christine
February 28, 2007 3:25 PM
HASH(0xb03116c)
In light of the sex abuse scandal, and various smaller scandals like this one, it baffles me how anyone can still believe in apostolic succession. Okay. Then what's the excuse in the Protestant/Evangelical denominations that don't have apostolic succession and the same thing happens? And please don't play the numbers game. Whether its one or a thousand, the fact that it *happens* at all is proof that people of all times and places can submit to sinful temptations. Apostolic succession is the guarantor of the faithful tranmission of the teachings of Christ down the corridors of time. It was never a guarantee that his disciples would never sin.
Ann
February 28, 2007 4:38 PM
HASH(0xb0323ec)
So are there any statistics showing the frequency of sex abuse in Protestant religions? Based on all I've read, far more abuse has been reported in the Catholic faith. And yes, I would say that the numbers do matter. I believe one report (might have been the John Jay study) showed that about 2/3 of Catholic bishops covered up for pedophile priests. A pattern of this type of behavior is disturbing, and begs the question as to why there is so much "rotten fruit". Until I see comparable evidence of child sex abuse in the Protestant faiths, it appears to me that there is a big, big problem in Catholicism.
Don
February 28, 2007 5:26 PM
www.catholicfriendsofisrael.com
But what Egan did is typical of the American Catholic Church's priorities, even before the Sex Abuse Scandal. Think aboutit , what "value" was this Lithuanian Church? They probably did a decent Mass, without the folk dancing, unsingable songs, and other liturgical idiocies; they probably attended to the SPIRITUAL needs of their flock. How boring! Did they attend to the Holy Trinity (death-row inmates, illegal aliens, peace-loving Muslims)? Probably not. Where's the army of social justice folk to cry for the Mass murderer? Where's the thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of dollars raised for the aforementioned Holy Trinity? And if their Church had "historical value," then it probably looked like a church, instead of Taco Bell World Headquarters. They probably had kneelers or an alter rail, or other things that make Jesus sad. And if they had Saint relics in their alter...well those @$%#'s got what they deserved! Catholic Churches are for white, Anglo-liberals with lots of disposable income. Not crazy Lithuanians who want to pray the Rosary and take communion on the tongue. Everything's groovy now.
watsy
February 28, 2007 5:33 PM
HASH(0xb033098)
Closing a church would be a tough thing to do. There has to be a better way to handle it than this. Pauli, I don't get you. What do Kathleen and Diane think of that video, and is that really a video that a friend would choose to share?
Christine
February 28, 2007 5:45 PM
HASH(0xb033d90)
So are there any statistics showing the frequency of sex abuse in Protestant religions? Based on all I've read, far more abuse has been reported in the Catholic faith. And yes, I would say that the numbers do matter. Any organization that involves children is going to attract pedophiles. The Catholic Church is huge and with its many parochial schools and altar servers is a perfect vehicle for those who want access to children. While I am in no way excusing the miserable way that most of the bishops handled the crisis I would still submit that numerically speaking the number of Catholic priests who committed these crimes is low compared to those who didn't. Pedophiles look to repeat their behavior as much as possible so the number of victims per incident is often high. It's just been in the past couple of years that we are beginning to hear about similar scandals in the Protestant churches, not to mention teachers, coaches, and other adults who it seems are being convicted almost daily of sexually abusing minors. Having been raised Lutheran I was dismayed to find out that a Lutheran pastor teaching at the University of Chicago was convicted of possessing child pornography on his office computer. I attended an Episcopal parish for about a year before becoming Catholic. Just do a google of the sexual scandals that have rocked that denomination. No one is immune.
dad29
February 28, 2007 6:59 PM
http://dad29.blogspot.com
An interesting parallel may be the way firings and layoffs of professional/managerial staffers are handled at large publicly-held companies. The person is brought into the HR office and told that they have been fired. They are escorted by a Company security-type to their desk; they are allowed to remove personal items and put them into a box. The guard then escorts them to the door. End of story. Seems heartless? Nope. It's the best way to protect the Company AND THE ONE WHO WAS DISMISSED. Nobody can later claim that something was "missing" from the desk, or that some Company documents were "taken" by Charlie X. Do it. Do it fast. Do it clean.
David J. White
February 28, 2007 7:23 PM
HASH(0xb034938)
The problem, dad29, is that the pastor really isn't being fired as an "employee" of the Church and the parishioners certainly aren't employees. Besides, if the pastor lives at the parish rectory, he is essentially being kicked out of his HOME as well.
Joel
February 28, 2007 8:59 PM
HASH(0xb035fd0)
Christine, IF we accept your premise that child abuse happens among Protties at the same rate that it does among RC's - a highly dubious claim, but I will pretend to accept it for now - it still remains to be explained why so many of "Peter's successors" are so willing to lie, commit felonies, and damage their flocks in order to protect said abusers. Protestant ministers do sometimes commit abuse. But since it is generally the local congregation that has power to hire and fire a minister, there is no broader scandal. No coverup. No shuffling from one congregation to the next (unless the minister manages to get another job on his own, in which case it is still a one-man crime). The complicity of bishops and archbishops in protecting abusers, covering up the abuse, and attacking people who try to expose it is a uniquely Catholic phenomena.
Pauli
February 28, 2007 9:03 PM
http://contrapauli.blogspot.com
Watsy: "Pauli, I don't get you. What do Kathleen and Diane think of that video, and is that really a video that a friend would choose to share?" Watsy, as Diane, Kathleen and I are all Catholic I'm sure they think the same thing as I do about that ridiculous video. A "pre-anti-Christ" will be the next Pope as John Paul II redivivus? And I like the way they start playing a rap beat at that point. Might as well pick up a few racial bigots along the way to pad the anti-Catholic ranks. I'm just saying that once you say anything like "maybe the Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon" it's time open your eyes to meet your new neighbors.
watsy
February 28, 2007 9:36 PM
HASH(0xb037718)
Thanks, Pauli. I thought that you meant to make a point that was not anti-Catholic, but I needed for you to spell it out. I'm trying to get your sense of humor, but like the cat burning thing, I'm often at a loss.
Biblebeliever
February 28, 2007 9:56 PM
HASH(0xb037d60)
You know while I accept that there are some good men who became priests with good intentions, even if I disagree with the Catholic religion wholeheartedly, I do not believe they are the ones who have gained power positions within the Catholic church system, the fruits of the ones in the highest positions seem to be incredibly jaw-droppingly more and more evil. How come there has never been one "good" bishop to speak out against the nonsense of his surrounding colleagues who exhibit more and more criminal and corrupt behavior as time goes by? When Catholics tell me, that leaders sin making excuses for this stuff... of course!...it is EVERYWHERE in every kind of church, but the problem is, when just about all of them are corrupt and colluding together to protect criminal behavior...[the scandal of the scandals wasnt that sex abusers exsisted in your church, but the INSTITUTIONAL COVER-UP]-- you have a major problem. Just google BISHOP EGAN and BRIDGEPORT. This guy got promoted AFTER THAT? The whole system is broken, and I know that this is one reason for me as an ex-Catholic the teaching of apostolic succession collapsed like a house of cards.
Simon
March 1, 2007 2:16 AM
HASH(0xb038850)
Protestant ministers do sometimes commit abuse. But since it is generally the local congregation that has power to hire and fire a minister, there is no broader scandal. And for exactly that reason, Protestant churches don't make a very attractive target for plaintiffs lawyers, without whom there is no media coverage.
M.Z. Forrest
March 1, 2007 4:32 AM
http://discalcedyooper.blogspot.com
This is absolutely ridiculous. Here is the Cardinal's press release. http://archny.org/news-events/news-press-releases/index.cfm?i=3956 Note: Sunday and Holy Day Masses were regularly attended by six to thirty persons. They were in English, inasmuch as the priest serving the parish for many years does not understand, read, or speak Lithuanian. There have been virtually no weddings or funerals in the church for years. Moreover, persons wishing to participate in Mass and parish activities in Lithuanian are informed of Lithuanian parishes in the neighboring Diocese of Brooklyn and Archdiocese of Newark. Your typical Catholic parish that falls below 500 families is a candidate for closing. 6-30 people is 1-10 families. Life goes on. There are 97 parishes in Manhattan alone. Talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Rod Dreher
March 1, 2007 4:35 AM
HASH(0xb038bc8)
You will note that I don't fault the cardinal for closing the parish. For all I know, he had good reasons. I'm simply astonished by the coldness with which he went about it on the day of.
Pauli
March 1, 2007 1:55 PM
http://contrapauli.blogspot.com
"I'm simply astonished by the coldness..." Obviously, because the Post no doubt gives us the entire story.
Joel
March 1, 2007 2:44 PM
HASH(0xb03b33c)
Pauli (and Simon above) both remember to recite the mantra: It's the anti-Catholic media's fault. Why do they keep picking on us?
Christine
March 1, 2007 4:08 PM
HASH(0xb03c128)
Just today there appeared two new stories of sexual abuse of minors by teachers, one male and one female (the female is married). The following statistics appeared on another blogsite: In a single year, 1998, the Dept of Justice listed 103,600 cases of sexual abuse in public schools. From 1950 to 2003, there were 10,667 reported cases of clergy sexual abuse. That's 10 times as much in one year as there were in 53 years in the Church. Yet nobody is passing laws singling out teachers for special exemption from ordinary laws. Only Catholics. It makes no more sense to demonize the entire Catholic hierarchy for the abuses committed by some than it would to condemn all teachers. Let the guilty, and only the guilty, be punished.
Biblebeliever
March 1, 2007 4:29 PM
HASH(0xb03d310)
Speaking of the teachers and sex abuse: So, men pledged to uphold God's standards, are to be judged ONLY by the world's standards? Isn't that a sad, sad commentary on the state of the RCC today? We are NOT WORSE than someone else?
Christine
March 1, 2007 4:56 PM
HASH(0xb03d37c)
Nope. Merely proves the reality of original sin. By the way, I've always contended that married men who abuse their children are the most heinous of all. They are the first image of God for their children, not priests or ministers.
Luci
March 1, 2007 8:27 PM
HASH(0xb03e6f8)
If any of you are still reading this thread and are much more knowledgeable than I could explain the following, I'd appreciate it. I found this online: To: The Most Reverend Edward Cardinal Egan, Archbishop of New York Your Excellency, A half-century of brutal religious and cultural oppression has scattered people of Lithuanian origin around the world. Many found their way to New York City, and even today continue to do so. Since 1905 they, along with countless other faithful, have been welcomed, comforted and inspired by Our Lady of Vilnius parish, so intimately tied to the most beloved of shrines in their homeland. This is the only Lithuanian parish in all of Manhattan. The beautiful church at 570 Broome Street, while currently not being used because of repairable roof damage, is overall in very good condition. We respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to close this vibrant, living parish; reestablish communication with its representatives; and release the funds for the needed building repairs from the parish insurance claim which has already been paid to the Archdiocese. I don't understand the last line-- is it legal to use insurance money for something other than it was intended? TIA...
Simon
March 1, 2007 8:41 PM
HASH(0xb03e7e8)
Pauli (and Simon above) both remember to recite the mantra: It's the anti-Catholic media's fault. Why do they keep picking on us? Wrong, Joel. I didn't (and don't) fault the media on this at all. Neither am I any sort of apologist for the U.S. Catholic hierarchy's attrocious handling of these cases. My point was that your claim that the congregational structure of Protestant churches prevents abuse and coverups doesn't hold water. What that kind of structure does prevent is the denomination becoming a fat target for plaintiffs lawyers. If a Protestant pastor does something unlawful or actionable, only the assets of his own local church are potentially at stake. Even if it's a mega-church, that's small potatoes for a plaintiffs lawyer. But consolidate hundreds of local churches into one big legal entity and you've got the potential makings of a trial lawyers retirement fund. That's what's going on with the Catholic Church. Whether abuse or coverups are prevalent within Protestant denominations is something I have no clue about. What I do know is that you'd hear about more of it if there were an entire sub-industry of lawyers dedicated to pursuing contingent fee lawsuits against those denominations. But the financial incentives simply aren't there to generate that kind of interest among plaintiff's lawyers. And few lawsuits means little basis for news coverage.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
Given the justifiably negative press they often get, you'd think the bishops would learn a thing or two about at least appearing to be pastorally sensitive. I guess possessing even a modicum of intelligence is not a prerequisite for prelates...and we're the poorer for it.
I wonder if the Catholic Church is beginning the transition into the Whore of Babylon, as foretold in Revelations. As of late its cardinals, bishops, and priests have not really been acting as God's apostle on Earth. This is just one more example. ;^( -------------------------------------
You know, mlyons619, I've been wondering exactly the same thing. The Whore of Babylon.... yeah, here's something I found that is particularly intriguing about Pope John Paul II.
Goodness I hope Pauli is being sarcastic. That video is so full of s*** it's unbelievable. (and I'm not even Catholic.) Factually speaking, it is not true that "millions" died during the inquisition. An enlightenment myth. As far as the torture of protestants or whatever, we also must remember that if catholic princes/rulers did that to protestants, so to did protestants do that to Catholics. Brutally and in great numbers. So, one could say that the 'martyrs of Jesus' were Catholics. If the Catholic church is the beast/antichrist/woman, etc., why is the Catholic church the one institution in the West (and I guess the Orthodox too) that is reliably pro-life? Just part of the devil's grand strategy of deception? It is very, very bad for one to base one's theology primarily on Revelation. In fact, one of the chief Protestant doctrines of interpretation is that that which is most clear in Scripture is most important, and that which isn't clear ought be left alone. Anyway.
as foretold in Revelations First of all, it's the Book of Revelation, not "Revelations" (or, if you prefer, the Apocalypse) and there ain't no mention of the Catholic Church whasoever. Go back and do some remedial exegesis.
And yes, the way Cardinal Egan handled the closing stinks.
In light of the sex abuse scandal, and various smaller scandals like this one, it baffles me how anyone can still believe in apostolic succession. I don't doubt that people of apostolic caliber are still in the world today, but these clearly are not the people being promoted in the Church.
In light of the sex abuse scandal, and various smaller scandals like this one, it baffles me how anyone can still believe in apostolic succession. Okay. Then what's the excuse in the Protestant/Evangelical denominations that don't have apostolic succession and the same thing happens? And please don't play the numbers game. Whether its one or a thousand, the fact that it *happens* at all is proof that people of all times and places can submit to sinful temptations. Apostolic succession is the guarantor of the faithful tranmission of the teachings of Christ down the corridors of time. It was never a guarantee that his disciples would never sin.
So are there any statistics showing the frequency of sex abuse in Protestant religions? Based on all I've read, far more abuse has been reported in the Catholic faith. And yes, I would say that the numbers do matter. I believe one report (might have been the John Jay study) showed that about 2/3 of Catholic bishops covered up for pedophile priests. A pattern of this type of behavior is disturbing, and begs the question as to why there is so much "rotten fruit". Until I see comparable evidence of child sex abuse in the Protestant faiths, it appears to me that there is a big, big problem in Catholicism.
But what Egan did is typical of the American Catholic Church's priorities, even before the Sex Abuse Scandal. Think aboutit , what "value" was this Lithuanian Church? They probably did a decent Mass, without the folk dancing, unsingable songs, and other liturgical idiocies; they probably attended to the SPIRITUAL needs of their flock. How boring! Did they attend to the Holy Trinity (death-row inmates, illegal aliens, peace-loving Muslims)? Probably not. Where's the army of social justice folk to cry for the Mass murderer? Where's the thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of dollars raised for the aforementioned Holy Trinity? And if their Church had "historical value," then it probably looked like a church, instead of Taco Bell World Headquarters. They probably had kneelers or an alter rail, or other things that make Jesus sad. And if they had Saint relics in their alter...well those @$%#'s got what they deserved! Catholic Churches are for white, Anglo-liberals with lots of disposable income. Not crazy Lithuanians who want to pray the Rosary and take communion on the tongue. Everything's groovy now.
Closing a church would be a tough thing to do. There has to be a better way to handle it than this. Pauli, I don't get you. What do Kathleen and Diane think of that video, and is that really a video that a friend would choose to share?
So are there any statistics showing the frequency of sex abuse in Protestant religions? Based on all I've read, far more abuse has been reported in the Catholic faith. And yes, I would say that the numbers do matter. Any organization that involves children is going to attract pedophiles. The Catholic Church is huge and with its many parochial schools and altar servers is a perfect vehicle for those who want access to children. While I am in no way excusing the miserable way that most of the bishops handled the crisis I would still submit that numerically speaking the number of Catholic priests who committed these crimes is low compared to those who didn't. Pedophiles look to repeat their behavior as much as possible so the number of victims per incident is often high. It's just been in the past couple of years that we are beginning to hear about similar scandals in the Protestant churches, not to mention teachers, coaches, and other adults who it seems are being convicted almost daily of sexually abusing minors. Having been raised Lutheran I was dismayed to find out that a Lutheran pastor teaching at the University of Chicago was convicted of possessing child pornography on his office computer. I attended an Episcopal parish for about a year before becoming Catholic. Just do a google of the sexual scandals that have rocked that denomination. No one is immune.
An interesting parallel may be the way firings and layoffs of professional/managerial staffers are handled at large publicly-held companies. The person is brought into the HR office and told that they have been fired. They are escorted by a Company security-type to their desk; they are allowed to remove personal items and put them into a box. The guard then escorts them to the door. End of story. Seems heartless? Nope. It's the best way to protect the Company AND THE ONE WHO WAS DISMISSED. Nobody can later claim that something was "missing" from the desk, or that some Company documents were "taken" by Charlie X. Do it. Do it fast. Do it clean.
The problem, dad29, is that the pastor really isn't being fired as an "employee" of the Church and the parishioners certainly aren't employees. Besides, if the pastor lives at the parish rectory, he is essentially being kicked out of his HOME as well.
Christine, IF we accept your premise that child abuse happens among Protties at the same rate that it does among RC's - a highly dubious claim, but I will pretend to accept it for now - it still remains to be explained why so many of "Peter's successors" are so willing to lie, commit felonies, and damage their flocks in order to protect said abusers. Protestant ministers do sometimes commit abuse. But since it is generally the local congregation that has power to hire and fire a minister, there is no broader scandal. No coverup. No shuffling from one congregation to the next (unless the minister manages to get another job on his own, in which case it is still a one-man crime). The complicity of bishops and archbishops in protecting abusers, covering up the abuse, and attacking people who try to expose it is a uniquely Catholic phenomena.
Watsy: "Pauli, I don't get you. What do Kathleen and Diane think of that video, and is that really a video that a friend would choose to share?" Watsy, as Diane, Kathleen and I are all Catholic I'm sure they think the same thing as I do about that ridiculous video. A "pre-anti-Christ" will be the next Pope as John Paul II redivivus? And I like the way they start playing a rap beat at that point. Might as well pick up a few racial bigots along the way to pad the anti-Catholic ranks. I'm just saying that once you say anything like "maybe the Catholic Church is the Whore of Babylon" it's time open your eyes to meet your new neighbors.
Thanks, Pauli. I thought that you meant to make a point that was not anti-Catholic, but I needed for you to spell it out. I'm trying to get your sense of humor, but like the cat burning thing, I'm often at a loss.
You know while I accept that there are some good men who became priests with good intentions, even if I disagree with the Catholic religion wholeheartedly, I do not believe they are the ones who have gained power positions within the Catholic church system, the fruits of the ones in the highest positions seem to be incredibly jaw-droppingly more and more evil. How come there has never been one "good" bishop to speak out against the nonsense of his surrounding colleagues who exhibit more and more criminal and corrupt behavior as time goes by? When Catholics tell me, that leaders sin making excuses for this stuff... of course!...it is EVERYWHERE in every kind of church, but the problem is, when just about all of them are corrupt and colluding together to protect criminal behavior...[the scandal of the scandals wasnt that sex abusers exsisted in your church, but the INSTITUTIONAL COVER-UP]-- you have a major problem. Just google BISHOP EGAN and BRIDGEPORT. This guy got promoted AFTER THAT? The whole system is broken, and I know that this is one reason for me as an ex-Catholic the teaching of apostolic succession collapsed like a house of cards.
Protestant ministers do sometimes commit abuse. But since it is generally the local congregation that has power to hire and fire a minister, there is no broader scandal. And for exactly that reason, Protestant churches don't make a very attractive target for plaintiffs lawyers, without whom there is no media coverage.
This is absolutely ridiculous. Here is the Cardinal's press release. http://archny.org/news-events/news-press-releases/index.cfm?i=3956 Note: Sunday and Holy Day Masses were regularly attended by six to thirty persons. They were in English, inasmuch as the priest serving the parish for many years does not understand, read, or speak Lithuanian. There have been virtually no weddings or funerals in the church for years. Moreover, persons wishing to participate in Mass and parish activities in Lithuanian are informed of Lithuanian parishes in the neighboring Diocese of Brooklyn and Archdiocese of Newark. Your typical Catholic parish that falls below 500 families is a candidate for closing. 6-30 people is 1-10 families. Life goes on. There are 97 parishes in Manhattan alone. Talk about making a mountain out of a mole hill.
You will note that I don't fault the cardinal for closing the parish. For all I know, he had good reasons. I'm simply astonished by the coldness with which he went about it on the day of.
"I'm simply astonished by the coldness..." Obviously, because the Post no doubt gives us the entire story.
Pauli (and Simon above) both remember to recite the mantra: It's the anti-Catholic media's fault. Why do they keep picking on us?
Just today there appeared two new stories of sexual abuse of minors by teachers, one male and one female (the female is married). The following statistics appeared on another blogsite: In a single year, 1998, the Dept of Justice listed 103,600 cases of sexual abuse in public schools. From 1950 to 2003, there were 10,667 reported cases of clergy sexual abuse. That's 10 times as much in one year as there were in 53 years in the Church. Yet nobody is passing laws singling out teachers for special exemption from ordinary laws. Only Catholics. It makes no more sense to demonize the entire Catholic hierarchy for the abuses committed by some than it would to condemn all teachers. Let the guilty, and only the guilty, be punished.
Speaking of the teachers and sex abuse: So, men pledged to uphold God's standards, are to be judged ONLY by the world's standards? Isn't that a sad, sad commentary on the state of the RCC today? We are NOT WORSE than someone else?
Nope. Merely proves the reality of original sin. By the way, I've always contended that married men who abuse their children are the most heinous of all. They are the first image of God for their children, not priests or ministers.
If any of you are still reading this thread and are much more knowledgeable than I could explain the following, I'd appreciate it. I found this online: To: The Most Reverend Edward Cardinal Egan, Archbishop of New York Your Excellency, A half-century of brutal religious and cultural oppression has scattered people of Lithuanian origin around the world. Many found their way to New York City, and even today continue to do so. Since 1905 they, along with countless other faithful, have been welcomed, comforted and inspired by Our Lady of Vilnius parish, so intimately tied to the most beloved of shrines in their homeland. This is the only Lithuanian parish in all of Manhattan. The beautiful church at 570 Broome Street, while currently not being used because of repairable roof damage, is overall in very good condition. We respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to close this vibrant, living parish; reestablish communication with its representatives; and release the funds for the needed building repairs from the parish insurance claim which has already been paid to the Archdiocese. I don't understand the last line-- is it legal to use insurance money for something other than it was intended? TIA...
Pauli (and Simon above) both remember to recite the mantra: It's the anti-Catholic media's fault. Why do they keep picking on us? Wrong, Joel. I didn't (and don't) fault the media on this at all. Neither am I any sort of apologist for the U.S. Catholic hierarchy's attrocious handling of these cases. My point was that your claim that the congregational structure of Protestant churches prevents abuse and coverups doesn't hold water. What that kind of structure does prevent is the denomination becoming a fat target for plaintiffs lawyers. If a Protestant pastor does something unlawful or actionable, only the assets of his own local church are potentially at stake. Even if it's a mega-church, that's small potatoes for a plaintiffs lawyer. But consolidate hundreds of local churches into one big legal entity and you've got the potential makings of a trial lawyers retirement fund. That's what's going on with the Catholic Church. Whether abuse or coverups are prevalent within Protestant denominations is something I have no clue about. What I do know is that you'd hear about more of it if there were an entire sub-industry of lawyers dedicated to pursuing contingent fee lawsuits against those denominations. But the financial incentives simply aren't there to generate that kind of interest among plaintiff's lawyers. And few lawsuits means little basis for news coverage.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.