Crunchy Con

Who are we?

Monday February 26, 2007

There was an interesting piece in yesterday's NYTimes opinion section, showing graphs from the General Social Survey tracking the change in Americans' opinions on particular issues over 34 years. The link to the short accompanying essay is here, but you...
Advertisement
Comments
ocho
February 26, 2007 9:34 PM
ochobl.blogspot.com

Rod - How do you respond to someone who sees a huge disconnect in your last two points there? Why shouldn't gays be allowed to teach in colleges? Why shouldn't gays be allowed to marry? In both cases, what's the big deal? Or, more relevant here, if one is a big deal, why isn't the other?

Douglas Cramer
February 26, 2007 9:41 PM
www.conciliarpress.com

I can think of all sorts of questions I'd love to see on this survey; guess I should google it. For example, attitudes about bi-racial marriage/children and about homeschooling. Bless, Doug

Erin Manning
February 26, 2007 10:10 PM
a

I'd also like to see a question added to most surveys: Are you the kind of person who always answers 'yes' or 'no' to a survey question, even if you haven't read the question, don't understand the question, or don't actually agree or disagree with the question as written? a)yes b)no (Apologies. Blame the allergies.)

god-is-in-the-tv
February 26, 2007 10:31 PM
HASH(0xbf6cfb8)

Great article - fascinating stuff. The numbers re: sex outside of marriage are interesting. In 1972, 1 in 3 people thought sex outside of marriage is "always wrong." In 2006, that number is 1 in 4. I wonder what the number would have been 34 years before that, in 1938? I also wonder if this shows the difference in how people view sex outside of marriage over time or how people view "always wrong" over time?

AlieraKieron
February 26, 2007 11:52 PM
HASH(0xbf6d11c)

For that matter, I find it interesting that 25% of people think sex outside of marriage is always wrong, but 95% of people have actually done it.

ChicagoCatholic
February 26, 2007 11:56 PM
HASH(0xbf6d3b0)

I've followed the numbers on abortion since researching them in college and am not surprised at all. The most notable thing about surveys on abortion is that it is really hard to pin down what people think. Opinions in surveys in general are dependent on the wording of the questions. The general rule of thumb that was developed in the research was that 15-20% are really against legalized abortion, 20-25% are really for legalized abortion and the rest would really, really rather not think about it. Women are particularly squemish about voicing an opinion, outside of a very vocal minority, but if pressed tend to be more pro-life than men.

known as 332
February 27, 2007 2:47 AM
HASH(0xbf6d7d8)

An interesting question - if general public opinion on the "issues of the day" hasn't moved in 30 years, can we say the same about the opinions of the elites? And what does that speak to given changes in the laws over the same period?

Scott
February 27, 2007 3:10 AM
HASH(0xbf6fe98)

I find it interesting that 25% of people think sex outside of marriage is always wrong, but 95% of people have actually done it. That's because in a sizable percentage of the population, their virginity grows back just before their wedding day. :)

godisaheretic
February 27, 2007 4:02 AM
HASH(0xbf6fde4)

"And I'm thinking: 30 percent of Americans think gays shouldn't even be allowed to teach college?" so... I suspect that without this extremely unenlightened 30 percent, a majority of us would be in favor of same-sex marriage... those 30 percent should heed the words of Jesus: "love your gay neighbor as yourself"... ... faith hope love joy peace to all...

salguod
February 27, 2007 5:57 PM
http://www.salguod.net/weblog

Look at the stats on sex outside of marriage this way: 23% fewer people think that sex outside of marriage is always wrong. Saying it's only 8 points makes it sound minor, but 8 points is 23% of 34 points. That's a cultural shift that I find saddening. Of course what people say they believe, and how they actually live (as AlieraKieron pointed out above) is quite telling.

Mark
February 27, 2007 6:27 PM
HASH(0xb83e15c)

The fact that people say that sex before marriage is wrong and that that many still do it, only shows that we all struggle with sin.

Erik
February 27, 2007 8:27 PM
http://executivepagan.blogspot.com

AlieraKieron, LOL. We had some friends, a very conservative RC couple (I say "had" because one day they apparently decided that they didn't need to be having liberal/pagan friends, and just dropped out of our circle). One day the wife (let's call her "Eve") was pontificating to one of our other friends ("Jezebel") about the fact that "Jezebel" was living with her boyfriend (whom she eventually married, if it makes a difference to anyone), and said, "I believe that sex outside of marriage is *always* wrong!" To which "Jezebel" replied, "Then you shouldn't have done it!" ("Eve" and her now-husband "Adam" had lived together while her first marriage was being anulled.) "Eve", oddly, did not immediately say, "You know, you have a point there", or even, "Yes, and I was wrong then too"... instead she spluttered self-righteously that that was "different", and changed the subject.

curiouser and curiouser...
February 28, 2007 3:51 PM
HASH(0xc0769d0)

"30 percent of Americans think gays shouldn't even be allowed to teach college?" Why does this surprise you Rod? Isn't 30% pretty close to the "Religious Right" in America? Does it not reveal their power and infuence over the thinking process in America? (Hint: They're agin' it.) "Man. I would have thought it was something like 10 percent" Now THAT surprises ME, Rod. I thought you were more attuned to the realities of America. One can still be legally fired in 33 States just for being gay. How hard do you think it is for an openly gay person even to get that college teaching job in the first place? "and even 34 years ago, the idea that a majority of people opposed gays teaching in college is startling to me, and disturbing." Why should it "disturb" you, Rod? You used to belong to a very powerful, influential religion that presupposes the very 'sinfulness' and 'disorderedness' of gay people, despite its alleged "love the sinner" message. Yes, it is (sometimes) couched in terms of homosexual acts, but people, being human, far too often fail to make that distinction. And your former religion is not alone. (I presume the Orthodox Church doesn't look too kindly on queer folk either.) But when you add the power and influence of the rightwing evangelicals like Falsewell, Robertson, Swaggart, Dobson, Perkins, et al, well, like I said, it surprises me that you are "startled" and "disturbed" by these statistics. They reflect all too well the harsh reality of life in America for God's gay and lesbian children. They don't want us to hold jobs, get apartments, keep our kids, and heck, some of 'em want us dead. (Pace matt Sheppard, Gwen Araujo, Aaron Webster, and that poor 72 year old guy in Michigan last week.) May I humbly suggest you take your head out of the sand, Rod?

Simon
March 1, 2007 12:52 AM
HASH(0xc07791c)

c and c, I recall seeing a Mori poll no more than 5 years ago showing that over 40% of the British public believed that homosexual behavior should be a criminal offense in ALL cases. Is that the "religious right," too? It's profoundly naive to equate hostility to homosexuals as persons with religious practice. It IS possible to hate the sin and really love the sinner -- that, in fact, is arguably the very essence of Christianity. More to the point, I've known or dealt with a TON of guys over the years who weren't religiously inclined in the least -- but who absolutely cannot stand gays. How do you explain that?

curiouser and curiouser...
March 1, 2007 3:40 PM
HASH(0xc078004)

Simon, "I recall seeing a Mori poll no more than 5 years ago showing that over 40% of the British public believed that homosexual behavior should be a criminal offense in ALL cases." I just googled Mori polls and homosexuality and found nothing that even remotely backs up your claim. Please provide a link so that I can at least know where you get your source material. The closest thing I DID find was a 2006 MORI poll in Ireland which showed: "that three-quarters of the population in the North say they are tolerant of gay men, lesbians and bisexuals and 88 per cent believe there should be no discrimination against them. Although those surveyed think the North is still intolerant towards sexual minorities, their own attitudes challenge that perception. While 59 per cent said they considered the North 'either not very or not at all accepting' of lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, only 21 per cent of the same people hold such views themselves. The largest concentration of homophobic attitudes remains in the Protestant Evangelical community. Fourteen per cent of Protestants said they were 'not at all accepting' of the gay community - almost exactly the same percentage of Protestants who say they are Evangelical Christians in repeated public surveys. Catholics, despite papal encyclicals describing homosexuality as 'evil', were more tolerant of the gay community than Protestants. Eighty-three per cent of Catholics said they were 'very accepting' of gays, lesbians and bisexuals compared with 70 per cent of Protestants." link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Northern_Ireland/Story/0,,1833593,00.html But this thread is about religious attitudes in Amerika. "It's profoundly naive to equate hostility to homosexuals as persons with religious practice." It most definitely is NOT "naive". Have you not heard of Falsewell's infamous "Declaration of War" against gays? I still have a copy of it. Have you not heard what Dobson, Robertson, Perkins, etc. SAY about gay people? Do you not think they have a modicum of influence? Heck, even the now disgraced "Reverend" Ted Haggart was a 'special advisor' to the White House. Methinks it is YOU who is naive. "It IS possible to hate the sin and really love the sinner -- that, in fact, is arguably the very essence of Christianity." It is indeed the essence of what Christianity is SUPPOSED to be about. Too bad so many can't sort out the difference and that so many of the "sinners" are the ones who get bashed. It MAY be possible, but in practice is rarely seen. "I've known or dealt with a TON of guys over the years who weren't religiously inclined in the least -- but who absolutely cannot stand gays. How do you explain that?" Easy. They're bigots. I know a TON of people who aren't religiously inclined in the least who absolutely cannot stand black people. Same difference. Hate is hate; injustice is injustice.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.