"The Vatican's Exorcists"
In today's Los Angeles Times, I
review the new book
"The Vatican's Exorcists," by Tracy Wilkinson, finding it frustratingly even-handed. Excerpt:
You step out of the book feeling as if you've read a newspaper series in which the reporter has dutifully and professionally touched the bases, but only that. The profound questions the book's subject matter raises about the nature of evil and the mysteries of mind and spirit, as well as the more mundane but still intriguing world of ecclesial politics, are left tantalizingly under-explored.
Maybe it's because I've been in similar situations as a journalist, but I kept wanting Wilkinson to drop the disinterested observer mask and tell us what she thought of the strange things she was seeing and hearing, in person (Wilkinson is present at an exorcism) and from the priests, sufferers and others to whom she speaks. It would have been interesting to have learned how she personally came to terms with what she was learning.
Despite its shortcomings, "The Vatican's Exorcists" is a useful, readable and serious-minded overview of a complex and controversial subject. One appreciates the attention that a journalist of Wilkinson's stature devotes to an ancient phenomenon that is far more important to the lives and experiences of ordinary Christians worldwide than the scoffers in newsrooms, on faculties and even chanceries care to recognize.
She could have turned away from this story either in fear or in mockery — I have seen journalists do both — but did not. Good for her for taking exorcism seriously. Too bad she didn't take it further.
Saw the review in today's paper. Good job.
Mayhaps there are scoffers because of exorcisms that went wrong such as Maricica Irina Cornici's and Terrance Cottrell Jr.'s did, among others.
How is the book compared to Fr. Martins Hostage to the Devil?
"Hostage to the Devil" is the scariest book I ever read. But I've come to doubt everything Malachi Martin reported in it. I just don't trust him. He was brilliant and insightful and knew a very great deal -- but he was also a teller of tales. I sympathize greatly with his side in theological controversies, but after having had lunch with him, and much later consulting with an orthodox Jesuit on his trustworthiness, I simply don't know what to believe about Fr. Martin. I wish I could be more confident. "Hostage" is theologically pretty serious, not just a bunch of ooga-booga stories. But as far as I know, he never produced the slightest bit of proof that the cases were real, and not simply products of his own imagination. I really hope that some posthumous substantiation for the cases in the book was discovered, and I never heard of it. Wanting to believe Fr. Martin's accounts is not the same thing as being able to trust them.
"The Exorcism of Emily Rose" is playing on cable alot lately. Don't watch it at night or alone.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.