My whole generation, I think, feels these tensions. No one I know seems able to settle in one calling or one place. It no longer seems believable that there once were people who spent a lifetime working on a single illuminated manuscript. This is an era not of spiritual dedication but of spiritual shopping -- of shopping, period. We have delayed or abandoned every form of commitment -- from marriage to child-rearing -- with the exception of debt. ...A part of us seems to hunger for collapse -- for the moment when we are truly forced to change.
This 100 Mile Diet seems to me like a secular version of a religious fast: it seeks to reorient the individual, to remind him of Things That Are, and of our radical dependence, despite the illusion of freedom. In fact, as Wendell Berry has written, it's a form of un-freedom to be at the mercy of industrialized and globalized agriculture. If the transportation system breaks down, and you're not able to eat because your food can't be shipped in from halfway around the world, how free are you? And spiritually, what does it do to your understanding of the world and your place in it when eating becomes an entirely commercial and abstract act? Writes Berry (from "What Are People For?"):
Both eater and eaten are thus in exile from biological reality. And the result is a kind of solitude, unprecedented in human experience, in which the eater may think of eating as, first, a purely commercial transaction between him and a supplier and then as a purely appetitive transaction between him and his food.
If you go here, you can punch in your zip code and get a map telling you what the 100-mile radius from your home is. Could you survive if all your food and drink had to come from within that radius? When my dad was a little boy back in rural Louisiana in the 1930s, they pretty much lived the 100-Mile Diet all the time, especially with hunting, fishing and growing gardens. My dad tells me if hard times come again, he'd know how to feed himself and his family. Me, I don't have a clue. I haven't had to learn it like he did back in the day. But it bothers me that there's not a local agriculture within a hundred miles of where I live capable of supplying an adequate amount of food for my area in case of crisis. Granted, I do live in one of the biggest cities in America, so it's not really fair to expect 100 miles to feed all of us. Still, it's a point well worth considering.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I read about the roadside stands, and I sympathize. BUT in a lot of places, that produce at those 'roadside stands' is coming out of boxes from California, etc. and not local at all. Sad but true.
Rawlins, that's true on the produce coming from Everywhere But Here. We had the same problem, until the local gardening club got involved, and they now run a farmer's market at the town square twice a month with smaller roadside stands around town during the growing season. All you do is take your stuff up there, and since this is an area where everybody knows everybody and what they're growing ;)), sell it, and you're done. The proceeds go back into the club for projects they do around the town and county. (And I forgot to put in my post earlier that I do not own a roadside stand. I think somehow it got implied that I did.
I don't.)
Crunchy con readers may find the following Flash movie of interest: Grocery Store Wars: http://www.storewars.org/flash/index.html It's well done, if nothing else.
Yep ... that's title of the Slate article here. I do think that Turkish Delight is one of those things that you have to be surrounded by as a kid. I've never seen it sold over here in America, except in British specialty stores. And precisely for a reason Schillinger states. Its consistency is like no other food product, much less any candy, I know of -- somewhere betwen rubber and gelatin (though it really is great). Also "chocolate-covered" is the only way I've ever eaten Turkish Delight. The Slate article even gives the maker of the bars, which in Britain are as ubiquitous as Snickers are here, that I gave Rod and some other CS Lewis fans -- Fry's. When I gave a couple of the same Fry's bars that Rod sampled to Julia Duin, she told me that a Lewis-loving friend of hers with whom she shared the candy read back to her the description from LWW and how different the jelly-like Fry's chocolate bar was. My mother (born 1943; me 1966) later told me (this is the first time I'm hearing this BTW) that Turkish Delight was then sold in the form Lewis described -- in bite-size balls covered in confectioner's sugar.
Oh ... and the haggis-drops were dusted in rolled porridge oats, not coconut, you philistine.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.