"A flippin' disaster"
Gen. Barry McCaffrey (Ret.) has been a war hawk. He teaches at West Point, and has just come back from touring the Middle East. He talked to a Dallas Morning News reporter yesterday in Dallas.
Read it and weep. Or something. Excerpt:
In a harshly worded critique of U.S. national security policy, retired Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey said Wednesday it is too late to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and that Saudi Arabia is likely to follow. Furthermore, he said, the U.S. is woefully unprepared to handle new threats, let alone the ones it now faces.
Gen. McCaffrey, interviewed during a Dallas visit, sharply criticized the Pentagon's handling of the Iraq war, saying the military is debilitated and on the verge of disaster as it confronts up to 100,000 armed insurgents and militiamen there.
The four-star general suggested that another major crisis, such as a military threat from North Korea or Iran, could force the U.S. to respond with nuclear weapons because it lacks the resources and staffing to fight another conventional ground war.
Gen. McCaffrey, formerly head of the U.S. Southern Command and once the Army's most highly decorated generals, made his assessment after completing trips to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait at the invitation of the U.S. Central Command in February and March.
On Iran's nuclear research program, which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes, Gen. McCaffrey warned that the Persian Gulf country will have a nuclear bomb within the next five years. "It's too late, without question. They're going nuclear," he said.
"The sad part is ... they [the Iranians] are not going to be any safer. The region will be less stable, and they will be acutely at greater risk," he said. If Tehran were to threaten the U.S. with a nuclear attack, it should expect the severest possible response, he said.
"If we ever saw a threat to our key allies or ourselves, there's no question in my mind: We would, if required, deploy a nuclear weapon."
He added that Saudi Arabia, a Sunni Muslim kingdom, would not sit idly by if its Persian Gulf Shiite neighbor acquired nuclear weaponry.
"For sure, if the Persian-Shia bomb becomes a dominant factor in the security of the Middle East, there will be a Sunni-Arab bomb to counter it," he said.
[snip]
He responded harshly to Pentagon announcements during the past week about extended troop deployments in Iraq and a recall of Texas-based troops who have had as little as seven months at home since their last combat tour.
"These completely inadequate ground combat forces cannot sustain that level of deployment unless we ask them, essentially, to stay in near-continuous combat" far beyond the Pentagon's one-year deployment target, he said.
[snip]
"Their equipment is shot. It's coming apart. We are in a position of enormous strategic peril," Gen. McCaffrey said. "What happens if the other shoe drops?" he asked, listing a possible major natural disaster or a direct military confrontation with Iran or North Korea.
The military "is grossly under-resourced. ... It's a flippin' disaster," he said. "You have to have generators, tents, trucks, helicopters just to sustain troops in a natural disaster. The question is: Can we put four divisions [70,000 to 80,000 troops] into Korea in 90 days? The answer is, of course we can't."
As a result, he said, "we'd probably have to use nuclear weapons before we lost 30,000 U.S. troops on the ground. If they're getting their asses kicked, we'd probably go nuclear."
According to my uncle (who worked as a priest with Vietnamese immigrants on the East Coast) the Vietnamese call the Vietnam War "the American War."
The scenario remains the same. Iran build a nuclear weapon, announces it to the world and Israel drops a hundred warheads on Iran, removing it as a power forever. The rest of the world sreams and yells but, as the US goes to defcon3, everyone does nothing but scream and yell because no one is going to die with Iran. To paraphrase Uncle Joe, "No country, no problem."
Benedict and the military eating out the hands of the left wing media? bwhahahahaha! I doubt the Pope even reads the left wing American media. He just knows something about this little thing called "just war doctrine". And the military? Well, what the hell do they know? They're over there getting shot at, not sitting in some cushy studio like happy talk flaks Sean Hannity and his ilk.
I think it is quite telling that Bush has not been able to get any retired generals to take on the "War Czar" job. Gee, I thought he was the "decider" and Commander in Chief. The generals apparently realized that 1) the job is a scapegoat setup 2) Bush never has listened to anyone yet that tells him something he doesn't want to hear and as one of the guys who turned the job down said "they don't know what the hell they're doing over there" so why would he want to be involved in something like that. Geez, what a mess! How can we bring this to any sort of even quasi-successful conclusion? I feel that not one more soldier should have to die so Sunnis and Shi'ites can kill each other and our troops, but I also don't want to leave a big mess, the Pottery Barn thing, I guess. But I lack any faith at all in our present leadership's competence to bring this off. Petraus has the stuff, but he is about 200,000 soldiers and a bunch of equipment short....
I can't help but remember that Hulegu solved the whole problem of the Isma'ili Assasins and islamic terrorism for centuries, but his tactics definitely wouldn't play in the media. Thats a big difference between us now and us during WWII. For better or worse, we were a lot more ruthless in war then than we are now. I am not at all convinced that we would use nuclear weapons, even if our lives depended on it.
angeles casino los royale angeles casino los royale angeles casino los royale. international football betting international football betting international football betting.>
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.