Crunchy Con

Gonzales on the rack

Thursday April 19, 2007

I'm listening to Alberto Gonzales's Senate testimony live, and boy, is he ever getting roasted. He's in deep, deep trouble. He's being evasive, he's shuffling blame off to his staffers, and he's demonstrating that he was really disengaged from running his office. He comes across as having been a rubber stamp for whatever the political operation of the White House wanted. When asked directly why he fired David Iglesias, Gonzales hemmed and hawed over the answer, but then said something very revealing: that Iglesias had "lost the confidence" of Republican Sen. Pete Domenici.

Excuse me, but who runs the Justice Department, the Attorney General or a Republican senator from New Mexico?

Sen. Schumer pointed out in the beginning that he was not going to accept "these US Attorneys serve at the president's pleasure" as a statement that ends the matter. It's true, as far as it goes, said Schumer, but if the president decided to fire every US Attorney with an IQ over 120, that wouldn't make the decision correct or defensible, and certainly doesn't make it beyond question or review. This might come as news to some, but the President of the United States is the nation's chief executive officer, not the Vicar of Christ.

Gonzales will be gone by this time next week.
Advertisement
Comments
Eric
April 19, 2007 11:49 PM
HASH(0x9385c98)

Remmeber also that Gonzales reportedly cleared his schedule and spent all of last week prepping for this testimony. Yikes, think how he'd've done cold...

ScurvyOaks
April 19, 2007 11:51 PM
HASH(0x9385db8)

Yep, Eric. It's reminiscent of how poorly Harriet Miers was apparently doing on the murder boards, notwithstanding spending a lot of prep time, before she threw in the towel.

Rod Dreher
April 20, 2007 12:42 AM
HASH(0x9386d48)

Exactly, and how come? Because these two are not capable of performing at that level.

fbc
April 20, 2007 8:36 AM
HASH(0x938a69c)

Thank you, Kim. What she said.

Rich
April 20, 2007 9:10 AM
HASH(0x938bdd4)

I agree Kim. Nail them to the wall over the real crimes, but this is nothing but show. The entire purpose of political appointees is for the Executive to control policy in its cabinet departments. They are all hired and fired for purely political reasons. It's the whole point.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.