Jonah, I think it highly uncool that you implied in one of your pieces that the late Sam Francis is in Hell. Bad taste indeed.
Osvaldo Mandias
April 17, 2007 2:42 AM
HASH(0xa8cde88)
I don't want to offend you, Mr. Dreher, and I don't think I need to detail what I think is wrong with CCism in order to make the point (I don't think you need me to detail what's wrong with paleoconism). The point is that not everyone who disagrees with CCism disagrees with traditionalism per se and therefore you shouldn't take disagreements with the one as disagreements with the other. And your unholy glee at Larison's shabby attack is still shabby.
chuck
April 17, 2007 5:30 PM
HASH(0xa8cf884)
"Spinning, my head is spinning." "It's not who is speaking that matters. What matter is who is listening." Uh, is anyone foolish enough to think that anyone is actually listening to any of this?
Sandie
April 17, 2007 6:59 PM
http://www.rlcv.com
You have a GREAT blog,I'm so glad I found it!!!! Hey, I found some GREAT buys on REPLICA WATCHES -- honestly, no one will know the diff erence!!!!
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
Dear God, no.
Jonah, I think it highly uncool that you implied in one of your pieces that the late Sam Francis is in Hell. Bad taste indeed.
I don't want to offend you, Mr. Dreher, and I don't think I need to detail what I think is wrong with CCism in order to make the point (I don't think you need me to detail what's wrong with paleoconism). The point is that not everyone who disagrees with CCism disagrees with traditionalism per se and therefore you shouldn't take disagreements with the one as disagreements with the other. And your unholy glee at Larison's shabby attack is still shabby.
"Spinning, my head is spinning." "It's not who is speaking that matters. What matter is who is listening." Uh, is anyone foolish enough to think that anyone is actually listening to any of this?
You have a GREAT blog,I'm so glad I found it!!!! Hey, I found some GREAT buys on REPLICA WATCHES -- honestly, no one will know the diff erence!!!!
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.