Robert Hutchins talked on his tour of the fields about how much costlier it is to raise livestock the natural way, but how they wouldn't do anything else. On several occasions he mentioned the hidden costs, nutritionally and otherwise, that our society pays in its mania for efficiency. We want it fast and cheap, no matter what. But we pay in other ways.
In that light, consider this e-mail from a reader:
Excellent post on the immigration bill. I think you're absolutely right that the key is what Americans want to pay for things, and, more profoundly, what kind of society they want to live in. You can't have it both ways. I'm sure you remember cabs in NYC. They're expensive by US standards but by European standards, they're preposterously cheap. The reason's simple: the immigrant labor. The same is true of food, landscaping, you name it. But are people really willing---and that's where I think you're right to ask the question---to envisage an America without helots?
Personally, I doubt it. As far as I can see, the 'Brazilianization' of the US, a herrenvolk democracy of whites and Asians with a servant class of blacks and Hispanics (I'm simplifying wildly, of course: there is a black bourgeoisie and some Hispanic groups, notably Cubans have joined the 'masters' of our society) is already a fait accompli.
Americans hate immigration, yes. But they'd be lost without it.
I understand people who want illegal immigration stopped, no matter what the cost. And I understand people who are fine with high levels of immigration, and consider it to be on balance a benefit to the economy. What I don't understand are people who want prices and services to remain as they are now, but want the illegals to go home and the borders to be closed. Can't be done. One way or another, we're going to pay.
Everybody ought to read the original reporting series the Dallas Morning News did on the illegal worker culture at the (subsequently raided) Swift meatpacking plants in Cactus, Texas. Again, there's something there to disturb Americans of all political persuasions. We simply cannot keep living like this as a country. The costs -- financial, criminal, and above all moral -- are too great.
But you know how we contemporary Americans are: expecting something for nothing, never expecting the bill to come due.
UPDATE: Once again, a provocative reader comment on Andrew's site. Excerpt:
The proposed immigration "reform" bill does very little for the immigrant and nothing for the communities which are unable to absorb their masses, but is a boon for corporations and liberal grandstanders needing to show their tolerance for diversity.
For the record, it is Big Business and liberals - not racists, "Bible thumpers" and "raving Dobbsians" - and sweethearts like your reader who relates the discussion about the farmer and his 35 cent peach, who wish to institutionalize a type of serfdom, one where employers do not need to provide brown-skinned Mexican worker bees with a minimum wage or benefits of any kind. All perfectly legal as long as we keep getting our fruit at a discount and our tables bussed cheaply.
And it is liberals - champions of government services - who apparently want to ensure that cities like Los Angeles where I live, must forever bankrupt and shut down community hospitals and emergency medical services; endure public schools jammed to the rafters with children of immigrants illiterate in their native language let alone English; and paralyze public transportation and other infrastructure simply by being overwhelmed by the hundreds of thousands of immigrants pouring across the border every year.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
And to get perosnal back... Yeah, okay, just try to post something substantive as well.
Excessive immigration and the cheap labor dilemma go back to 1947, when Republicans in congress passed the Taft-Hartley Act over Truman's veto. It made the labor organizing tactics of the 1930s illegal and stacked the deck in other ways against unionized labor.
Employees run the place, and when they are free to bring in the cheapest workers they can find, you get the situation we have now. Strong unions, although they have their flaws, are the only thing that can shut down the cheap labor cycle. The pro-immigrant stance that you see from unions today makes no difference whatsoever, because labor unions are by the very nature anti-low-wage-immigration. Unionized immigrants will fight against the wave to come in. Nor does ethnicity matter. Cesar Chavez himself arranged to have illegal aliens departed when they were being used as strikebreakers.
And untill some CEOs and HR directors are in prison and the ocmpanies fined under RICO, immigration raids are just a cost of doing business. I understand our crap work is an opportunity for illegals and legals alike and I don't believe that capitalism can or should stop at the border but the executives are the ones seriously profiting and who surely know better about the law.
http://dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20070501.html God bless.
What happened to the FREE Market? It really needs to be a little UNFREE like some regulation.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.