Well, there goes half the conservative Evangelical sources in the average American journalist's Rolodex. When Pat Robertson goes to be with the Lord, what on earth will the news media do?
OK, sorry, that's not the way to get into a discussion of the Rev. Falwell's legacy. As my liberal Evangelical colleague Bill McKenzie said on the Dallas Morning News blog, love him or hate him, Falwell was the most politically consequential American religious figure since the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. I think that's a fair and accurate assessment.
Falwell helped energize conservative Evangelicals around political issues, and organized them into a potent force. His movement was the vanguard of the Reagan Revolution, and he (as well as Pat Robertson and others) forcibly won a place at the American political table for Evangelicals. These two were the great boogeymen of American politics (I once heard a ranking editor at a news meeting complain angrily about why "we always hear about what radical Muslims are doing, but we never focus on what Falwell and Robertson are doing" to threaten America). In truth, I didn't agree with a lot of their style, and some of their substance. But nobody can deny the significance of Falwell to US politics. Christian conservatives like me may not have liked Falwell's style much of the time, or some of the causes he championed. I once wrote something extremely uncharitable about him after he blamed 9/11 on gays, feminists and so forth; it was so nasty that I regretted it afterward, and I wish I had thought to send him a note of apology; but he ought not to have said what he said. For all that, there's no denying how important his work was to the cause of the unborn, and other issues that matter to folks like me.
The truth is, though, Falwell was really yesterday's news. His passing today is not only the passing of a man, but the passing of an era. The next generation of engaged Evangelical pastors aren't like him and his generation. I'm generalizing, of course, but they are conservative, but not so partisan, and not as eager to cast their lot with the GOP. And they care about bringing their Christian faith to bear on a wider range of issues than that which galvanized the Falwell generation. This makes crunchy-con me quite happy, but the truth is that no matter how politically engaged Christian conservatives regard Falwell's legacy, we all owe him a debt. I'm pleased that Falwellism existed in its day, and I'm pleased that it is fading from the scene. And I pray that Jerry Falwell rests in peace.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Well, Cleveland, if hysteria and whining is what you think you hear, then I fail to find anything to respect in your stated position. I find your use of the verb "demonize" laughable at best, in this context. My use of language is precise; your choice of comprehension is nothing short of a child with his fingers in his ears, singing "la! la!" to make sure my voice is drowned out. Go on, call me a spawn of Satan. You will feel better for letting it out.
My friend, why do you keep making this about paganism? Why do you insist on making me say you are "a spawn of Satan"? I don't know what that means.
You know that I pray for you and others like you. Get off the caffeine and stop talking to Jesuits, or I'll have to double my prayers for you :-).
I should have realized in our previous exchange that you are not going to approach things as I expect or wish. I do understand that you mean well, Cleveland. My ire is with your ability to twist a subject out of context, while wondering what the to-do is all about when I react to your twisting. If you can, if you are willing, have someone you know who regularly disagrees with you read our exchange. Ask that person if I have reason for my ire. If that person can't see it, then I'll look for a caffeine substitute. Be well.
Sigaliris, "How is it disrespectful to repeat his own words when reviewing his career?" Yes, you nailed it right there. That's what some people forget when they are complaining about sound bites, and media caricature is that he actual said these things. Many people watched them come right out of his mouth. So, how is this a caricature? And how, can one say he never said anything mean about anyone when we do have all these quotes. Why should the 9/11 comment be pushed aside as though it doesn't matter? Of course it matters.
Ah, Franklin, a former neighbor (Salisbury, MD), and fellow Pagan waves hello.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.